Western Leaders And The Mainstream Media Facilitate And Are Complicit In Islamic Terror

Bill Muehlenberg tells it how it is:

I am angry – really angry. Angry at the Islamic terror attacks in Paris? Yes, of course. But I am also absolutely outraged at the lamestream media and its despicable coverage of this tragic affair. I spent most of Sunday having the great misfortune of listening to the Australian MSM on the attacks.

One fool journalist after another, one clueless media person after another, and one useless “expert” after another spouted off so much utter PC baloney and dhimmi idiocy that it made my blood boil. No one wanted to mention the “I” word. No one wanted to mention that there is an enemy which has vowed to destroy us.

No one wanted to mention that a particular political ideology, masquerading as a religion, has been doing this sort of stuff for 1400 years now. No one wanted to mention that it was not the West’s fault, but the fault of devout Muslims, taking their faith seriously.

Even 8-10 hours after the attacks there were still mindless wonders assuring us we cannot be sure who did this. Obama also said that he would ‘not speculate on who was responsible’. And how often did I hear nonsense like ‘We must not stigmatise Muslims’.

How many pointed the finger at the West? How many of these ‘experts’ managed to say that France and the West had brought this upon themselves. And right on cue, the dhimmi commentariat were mentioning the Crusades! Yep, 400 casualties in Paris are all OUR fault! Of course.

And the chattering classes were especially loathe to see any Islamic conspiracy here. Amazing how eight lone wolves could coincidentally do so much damage at the same time, and without any ideological basis for it. Likely disgruntled Sunday school teachers. And it is probably all Tony Abbott’s fault anyway.

After a while the lamestream media could no longer deny that this was terrorism. But not one commentator had the guts to tell us the truth: this is ISLAMIC terrorism. Not Baptist terrorism. Not Confucian terrorism. There is a political ideology behind all this. Until we identify who and what we are up against, we will keep losing, and more innocent men, women and children will horrifically die.

I actually saw one loon claim that the attacks were caused by capitalism! Cluelessness abounds. Just two days ago the American Dhimmi-in-Chief assured the American people that “ISIS has been contained” and that “ISIS is not gaining strength”. Yeah right, try telling that to the French.

And clueless critics are already saying I and other realists are fear mongering. Umm, stampeding Muslims massacring infidels do a pretty good job of instilling fear I would have thought. No need to shoot the messenger. Telling truth is always crucial, especially when you are under attack.

However a few brave souls here in Australia did get it right. Miranda Devine spoke some much needed truth here:

Beautiful Paris has been attacked by Islamist terrorists again. There’s no point pretending there’s any doubt about who the perpetrators are. Not a “lone wolf” gunman, not “disaffected youth” or “un-Islamic” madmen.

Less than a year after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the land of “liberte, egalite and fraternite” has been attacked at its heart, yet again, by Islamist fundamentalists driven by a murderous totalitarian ideology that cannot be appeased.

Co-ordinated, militaristic attacks by suicide bombers and gunmen on soft targets at six locations across Paris are designed to cause maximum casualties and maximum terror.

Survivors say terrorists wielding Kalashnikovs yelled “Allahu Akbar”, as they opened fire on young people watching a rock concert at the Le Bataclan theatre, scene of a dramatic police operation to rescue hostages from the carnage where 100 people were reported dead

And Andrew Bolt wasted no words on this:

Spare me the empty talk of politicians talking of their “shock” and “resolve” over the Paris massacre. Spare me the weasel words of our new Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, who yesterday could not bring himself to even whisper the word “Islam”.

But, no, here we go again with the same evasions, this time after more than 120 Parisians were slaughtered by Islamists for not being Muslim enough. “This is an attack … on all humanity,” declared Turnbull from Berlin. Er, no, it wasn’t. This was an utterly inevitable attack by Islamists on the French — indeed the West — for not submitting to their brand of faith

Or as Brendan O’Neil from the UK put it:

Less than 24 hours after the barbarism in Paris, the bodies of more than 120 concertgoers, Friday-night revellers and children barely cold, and the apologism has already begun. They couldn’t even wait a whole day, these cultural appeasers, whose kneejerk response to every act of terrorism is to ask what we the wicked West did to deserve it, or to argue that we the wicked West will make things worse with our response to it. The simple fact of our existence makes us ripe for murderous assault, apparently; and the folly of responding to such assaults with either police activity at home or military activity abroad makes us riper still for attack. We’re damned if we stay still, damned if we take action. Our citizens must die because our nations are nasty.

Indeed, former Prime Minister Tony Abbott had been warning Europeans just days ago about not allowing porous borders and open slather immigration policy. He was of course one hundred percent right, yet our current PM Malcolm Turnbull actually attacked Abbott for his sensible and proper remarks.

Many have warned that IS terrorists are quite happy to implant themselves in with the masses of migrating refugees in Europe, and that seems to be a successful strategy indeed. Some news reports already have mentioned that some of the dead jihadists had Syrian passports. Said one news item

One of the terrorists responsible for the slaughter of 129 people in the Paris attacks held a passport used to enter Europe from Syria, officials have claimed. The shocking development suggests the killer may have been posing as a refugee before travelling across the continent to carry out the atrocity.

Officials have also revealed a second man who carried out the mass murder was likely to have passed through to the continent in a similar way. A Greek government official revealed the first terrorist, who died in the series of attacks on the French capital, held the document of a man who had passed into the southern European country, probably by refugee boat, last month.

Much more sensible commentary is starting to emerge on these horrific attacks, so let me quote from a few of them. David French offers some advice on the way forward:

Francois Hollande is pledging to wage “pitiless” war. Good. Now let’s see if France backs up its words with actions. While France is often the butt of jokes about its military prowess, it not only has a centuries-old tradition of military valor, it breeds warriors still. May they be unleashed.

Fourth, if European leaders (and the Obama administration) retain a shred of sanity, they’ll rethink their approach to the migrant crisis and start to close their borders, quickly. There are almost certainly more terrorists who have recently arrived in European capitals, awaiting only weapons, organization, and an opportunity to launch the next attack.

And as usual some of the best commentary on this comes from Mark Steyn. His article “The Barbarians Are Inside, And There Are No Gates” is spot on. let me offer some of his insight and wisdom here:
As I write, Paris is under curfew for the first time since the German occupation, and the death toll from the multiple attacks stands at 158, the vast majority of them slaughtered during a concert at the Bataclan theatre, a delightful bit of 19th century Chinoiserie on the boulevard Voltaire. The last time I was there, if memory serves, was to see Julie Pietri. I’m so bloody sick of these savages shooting and bombing and killing and blowing up everything I like – whether it’s the town where my little girl’s favorite fondue restaurant is or my favorite hotel in Amman or the brave freespeecher who hosted me in Copenhagen …or a music hall where I liked to go to hear a little jazz and pop and get away from the cares of the world for a couple of hours. But look at the photographs from Paris: there’s nowhere to get away from it; the barbarians who yell “Allahu Akbar!” are there waiting for you …when you go to a soccer match, you go to a concert, you go for a drink on a Friday night. They’re there on the train… at the magazine office… in the Kosher supermarket… at the museum in Brussels… outside the barracks in Woolwich…

When the Allahu Akbar boys opened fire, Paris was talking about the climate-change conference due to start later this month, when the world’s leaders will fly in to “solve” a “problem” that doesn’t exist rather than to address the one that does. But don’t worry: we already have a hashtag (#PrayForParis) and doubtless there’ll be another candlelight vigil of weepy tilty-headed wankers. Because as long as we all advertise how sad and sorrowful we are, who needs to do anything?…

Visiting the Bataclan, M Hollande declared that “nous allons mener le combat, il sera impitoyable”: We are going to wage a war that will be pitiless. Does he mean it? Or is he just killing time until Obama and Cameron and Merkel and Justin Trudeau and Malcolm Turnbull fly in and they can all get back to talking about sea levels in the Maldives in the 22nd century? By which time France and Germany and Belgium and Austria and the Netherlands will have been long washed away….

I’m Islamed out. I’m tired of Islam 24/7, at Colorado colleges, Marseilles synagogues, Sydney coffee shops, day after day after day. The west cannot win this thing with a schizophrenic strategy of targeting things and people but not targeting the ideology, of intervening ineffectually overseas and not intervening at all when it comes to the remorseless Islamization and self-segregation of large segments of their own countries.
Yeah, I’m getting pretty sick and tired of all this as well. But as long as we have dhimmi dunces for our leaders, and the media filled with clueless wonders, we can expect a whole lot more of this.








The Greens Don’t Like The Idea Of A “Radicalisation Awareness Kit” Because They Are Radical, Ideological Terrorists Who Are Afraid Of Being Exposed

Whenever the Greens get angry about something, it usually is a strong indicator that someone is doing something moral, just, righteous, true, or indeed Christ-like.

When they start accusing that conservatives and even faux-conservatives of being responsible for “social division” and “fear and intollerance” – the very things these modern Marxists have perfected and practise wholeheartedly themselves – you know that a nerve has been sliced and diced.

The latest example of their venting – brought to us by the far-left ABC -certainly seems in line with the aforementioned:

Environmentalists and teachers are up in arms over a new Federal Government anti-radicalisation kit that links green activism and “alternative music” to terrorism.

The Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Terrorism Michael Keenan launched the Radicalisation Awareness Kit in the form of a 32-page booklet on Monday.

Through a series of examples and fictitious case studies, the booklet aims to illustrate the circumstances which can lead young people to become radicalised.

But one surprising example cites the power of the alternative music scene and environmental activism in the radicalisation process.

The case study in the ‘Violent Extremism’ section tells the story of a girl called ‘Karen’ who becomes involved in the “alternative music scene, student politics and left-wing activism” when she leaves home.

‘Karen’ ends up sabotaging logging machinery and being arrested “on numerous occasions” while becoming “totally cut off from her family”.

What do you think of the Government’s new Radicalisation Awareness Kit? Have your say below.

Jonathan La Nauze from the Australian Conservation Foundation said the booklet was misleading and potentially dangerous.

“This is very disappointing,” he said.

“It sounds like something that’s been dreamt up in the cigar room of the Institute of Public Affairs. There’s no resemblance to the way that people in Australia feel about their environment and the need to stand up to protect it.

“To link standing up for the places that we love, standing up for the future of our children, to violence and extremism and terrorism, does nothing to combat a real threat to the safety of people or to respect the very peaceful and very meaningful protests that people engage in from all walks of life to ensure that we have a safe future in this country.”

Despite the environmental case study, Mr Keenan said the main targets of the booklet were young people at risk of being radicalised by Islamist groups such as Islamic State.

“Of course radicalisation can take different forms but certainly their radicalisation that comes from contact with ISIL (Islamic State) – who make an enormous effort to groom people, particularly young people to commit violent acts here in Australia – is of primary concern to the government at the moment.”

He said the kit was designed to help teachers understand how the radicalisation process worked, and how to respond if they felt there was somebody in their community who is susceptible to it.

“We wanted to explain to teachers who are really on the frontline of this – because we know that school children are being radicalised – to look out for certain signs that would lead them to be concerned about somebody, and if they are concerned about somebody moving down the dark path of radicalisation, moving down the path of violence, then they’ll know what they can do about it,” Mr Keenan said

Radicalisation Awareness Kit ‘designed to engender fear and intolerance’

Maurie Mulheron, the president of the New South Wales Teachers’ Federation, has also slammed the launch of the kit, describing it as a cynical exercise designed to generate fear in the community.

“I think it’s a fairly cynical move by the Federal Government not to make anyone feel safer but to engender fear and intolerance,” he said.

“I’m very doubtful that the Federal Government has pure motives in this area.

“They’ve got a track record now of trying to engender division within the community on these issues and I don’t think that what they’re proposing will make one iota of difference.”

Mr Mulheron believes that teachers are already well trained to know when students are at risk of being radicalised, and that the Radicalisation Awareness Kit has been a massive waste of time and money.

“Schools are already happy, safe and tolerant places that bring children together, particularly public schools that bring children from all the different walks of life, different religions, different backgrounds, different socio-economic groups.

“We as teachers are very good at bringing a diverse group of young people into our schools and turning them into a community so they can take up their roles as citizens within the broader community.”

Mr Keenan said groups seeking to radicalise young people started by separating them from their communities.

“ISIL go and they try to groom young people in in the same way that a paedophile might try and groom a young person. We want to make sure that the people who are on the frontline, teachers and other service workers, members of the community, are able to identify if this is happening and then know what they can do to arrest it from happening.”

Few people have actually held a copy of the booklet in their hands. It was released on the first day of the school holidays, but it is available for download on the minister’s website.

Assessment of the kit will continue in earnest when schools go back in two weeks’ time.

I suppose that it does sound pretty dangerous to link alternative music to terrorism…apart from the fact that is exactly what alternative music has achieved in the West over the past seventy years.

Music has been used to radically and extremely reshape our entire culture, creating subgroups and dividing society, just as Mr Keenana mentions in the article above.

Just think about the rejection of authority that accompanied the music and drug fuelled rebellion of the 1960’s.

We literally had the youth of that generation caught up in a movement that transformed the culture known for Millenia as “Christendom” into the “progressive” Marxist-styled cesspool of the contemporary West.

So where teenagers were once taught to accept authority and responsibility, the alternative music of the 60’s served to propagate ideologies of antiauthoritarianism that have led us to a culture where families are broken by divorce, generations of elderly rot alone in “nursing homes”, and sexual depravity and murdering children by the billions is taught to every successive generation as the cornerstone “rights” and “freedoms” of our civilisation.

So it sounds clever to say that listening to a song never drove anyone to terrorism but let’s look a bit further than rhetoric.

It’s funny how just as the West was warring against the oppressive revolutionary Marxism in the East which led to the murder of tens of millions of people, a movement of Western youth rose up against our own governments with an anti-war message born from cultural Marxism.

It would almost be righteous if they werent drug-fuelled, sexual deviants whose cultural impact led to not only a passive US foreign policy in the face of the worst terrorist threat up to that point in history, one that overtook South East Asia murdering millions, but also toward a significant contribution to the very worst mass-execution of human beings in history: abortion.

And the impact of music in driving this movement can be overlooked only by those who partake in this evil Marxist ideology.

Anyone with open eyes has to give at least one solitary though to how we went from Nat King Cole and Doris Day to the likes of Slipknot, Chris Brown and Lady Gaga.

The underlying question is really how a society goes from valuing things like Christianity, family, morality and objectivity to things like hedonism, subjective emotions, and people with penises claiming to be girls, using the ladies changerooms, and being championed across every form of mainstream media as heroes (an oppressive, white, rigidly traditional, patriarchal society sometimes refers to these people as “boys”).

This insane deviation from pretty much every cultural trajectory in all history wouldn’t have anything to do with the dominating art form of music, one that bypasses rational thought and successfully targets the emotions with catchy tunes and memorable lyrics, legions of which promote casual sex, the rejection of parental authority, sticking it to authority in general, living recklessly, doings drugs, being born homosexual, objectifying women as sexual objects, and everything antichrist, etc.

Back to terrorism. 

What greater terrorists are there than those who war against objectivity and truth?

What greater terrorists are there than those who target the weakness of human flesh to encourage every perverse act as the embodiment of “freedom”?

What greater terrorists are there than those who celebrate the “dignity” of murdering children in the womb by the hindered of millions?

What greater terrorists are there than lead a culture away from God towards the worship of self?

Satan, the original terrorist and father to terrorists everywhere, is behind all these things and his children delight to do his will.

So my guess is these Radicalisation Awareness Kits have hit the leftist nail on the head.

Cursing, Lying And Intollerance: When The Left Doesn’t Get Their Way

The homosexual lobbyists know that they are close to forcing their agenda on everyone but a few small thin are holding them back.

That’s why they are getting really angry and cursing and lying about how marriage should be redefined.

They know that a national vote stands a good chance of denying them for a long time and that’s why the ABC is putting their curses in the headlines, tantrum-style.

Apparently not everyone is bent on destroying the institution of marriage after all, despite the left’s attempts to lie to us otherwise.

So at least we can see the internal bitterness, resentment, Intollerance, and outright deceit pouring out of them as they fail to get exactly what they want – much like small, aggressive  and undisciplined children. 

These are, in my experience, constant qualities of the left and perfectly compatible with their values of murdering children, promoting sexual immorality, and destroying things of beauty in the West and even the world.

Here’s the story:

Labor senator Sam Dastyari has described the Government’s moves to hold a public vote on same-sex marriage after the next election as “bullshit”.

After a prolonged debate in the Coalition party room this week, a clear majority of Government MPs and senators voted to maintain the party’s position against legalising same-sex marriage.

The Prime Minister has suggested a public vote in the next term of parliament, but has not specified whether he favours a referendum or plebiscite.

If successful, the referendum option, which is backed by cabinet minister Scott Morrison, would lead to constitutional change.

“The type of issue that could be canvassed under Section 51 of the constitution — simply at the moment, in Clause 21, it just says ‘marriage’,” Mr Morrison said.

“You could equally put in there ‘opposite- and ‘same-sex marriage’ and clarify very clearly what the meaning of the constitution is on this question, and to reflect [what] some would argue has been a societal change since the constitution was first written.”

But Labor argues that given the difficulty of getting the double majority of state and national support required for constitutional change, the proposal is designed to fail.

Some conservatives and Christian groups that are opposed to gay marriage believe a failed referendum could push the issue off the national agenda for many years.

A plebiscite needs to reach a lower bar, only requiring national support, but the Government would not be not compelled to act on the result.

Speaking to reporters outside Parliament House this morning, Senator Dastyari said the Government’s push for a public vote is designed to stop gay marriage being legalised.

“What we’ve seen happen on the issue of marriage equality in the past couple of days is disgraceful,” Senator Dastyari said.

“It’s a rort, it’s a joke, it’s a false premise and frankly we need to call it for what it is and that is bullshit.

“The Australian public have had their say, they want these laws passed, we can pass them now, frankly we should be passing them now.”

Government MP Warren Entsch has been given approval for a private members bill to legalise gay marriage, but he has acknowledged the outcome of the party room vote this week suggests there would not be enough support in the Lower House even if Coalition MPs had a conscience vote.

Two Coalition backbenchers, WA senator Dean Smith and Queensland MP Wyatt Roy have confirmed they are prepared to cross the floor on the issue.

So Christians, vote Labor back in at our own peril.

Pray for our government because priorities are way out of whack.

Muslims: The Perpetual Faux-Victims Of Westerners?

While scouring the ABC News website for any mention of Planned Parenthood’s horrific crimes is like finding a needle in the ocean, they have managed to throw a forum concerning anti-Muslim “racism” and “hate crimes” into their top ten list of important news items concerning Australia:

Nasrin Amin did not know Martin Place gunman Man Haron Monis but during December’s deadly siege the Melbourne IT worker said she felt his actions personally.

Racism hurts”, she told a 200-strong crowd at a forum on Islamophobia in the Melbourne suburb of Coburg on Sunday.

Ms Amin wears a black veil that covers half of her face. She organised the awareness forum in part because of her personal experience, and because of the stories she heard of other Muslim women who have been attacked.

Incidents included having their scarves pulled off them, and in one case, a woman had coffee thrown on her.

“From a victim’s point of view, Islamophobia is racism,” Ms Amin said.

“People can say Islam is not a race … but from a victim’s point of view this kind of abuse … affects our lives, how we go on with our daily lives.”

Melbourne’s Muslim community is increasingly concerned about anti-Islamic sentiment.

Now, I do not in any way support any kind of violence or intimidation against anyone and that includes Muslims. I do not believe the term “racism” is even worth using because we have been scientifically proven to be fully and equally human (despite the long-held teachings of Darwinian evolution that persist to this day) and since we are all made equally in God’s image, the only thing that differentiates us is what we believe and consequently, how we behave.

Nonetheless, I will use the term simply for the sake of engaging in the ongoing bombardment of white, Western nations with this vile and often false ad hominem.

With that clear, let’s dig into why this “news report” is typical leftist collectivising, race-baiting rubbish.
The claim is a “200-strong crowd” but the image attached to the article suggests an interestingly empty hall. The ABC, along with other mainstream media outlets, seem to have a habit of overestimating events like this and significantly underestimating numbers at pro-life and pro-marriage events.

It’s worth noting that typical blinding bias when it comes to these kind of things, especially since this is in the ABC’s top ten news item list, a place you will never find the aforementioned.

From the point of view of using words and definitions correctly, Islam is not a race or an ethnicity so why does Amin and others insist on implying that it is, almost as though they are seeking to capitalise on the silencing power of accusing white people of being “racists”?

If it is true that Amin has been physically and verbally abused, then of course this is wrong. However, when it comes to both the ABC and Muslim reports of “racist attacks” against Muslims, I remain in a constant state of doubt and suspicion and for good reason, especially given how leftist-types with plenty of free time head out there to feign racial abuse and hate crimes on the street.

Even if this particular case is real, it does not justify adding to the leftist doublespeak that confuses the blatantly clear divide between biological appearance and personal religious belief, especially when the religious belief in question has killed 240 million people in the last fourteen centuries and often through unimaginably cruelty and brutality which continues even today.
There is no clearer way to say it: race is unchangeable and does not impact the way you behave while religion is a personal belief that determines values and behaviours. Race cannot be morally evil while many religions clearly are.

Forums on “anti-Islamic sentiment” somehow ring hollow in light of the reality that very few, if any, Muslims seem to actually come to any harm at the hands of Westerners – if they did, the media would never let us hear the end of it!

Furthermore, the countless Islamic terrorist attacks that occur every day in nations across the world where both Westerners and Muslims are murdered drives my point home – Muslims are almost always the perpetrators of racism, terror acts, and crime against Westerners (and others!) and not the other way around.

Therefore, “Islamophobia” actually seems to be a rational fear as opposed to an irrational one implied by “phobia” specifically because Islam is responsible for an incalculable number of deaths, most of which are designed to terrorise people.

There is certainly a great opportunity for the church to build relationships with Muslims and show them the loving kindness that Christ Jesus shows us.

However, we do not have to accept the constant accusations of racism, Islamophobia, sexism, homophobia, etc that the leftist media and some Muslim communities label us with just because we are white Westerners.

That is the only confirmed racism occurring here.

Once again, the ABC elevates a news story that has almost zero interest to the general population of Australia all for the sake of continuing to label white Australians as racists, this time at the hands of supposed Muslim victims.

Leftist thrive on social division, pitting black against white, men against women, everybody against Christians, all because they can only sow disorder and chaos. The left cannot build anything for itself, only tear down and deface.

It’s why they hate marriage and promote anything that safeguards it, whether divorce or adultery, homosexuality or polygamy, pornography and anything else that breaks up families, destroys their financial independence, and makes them dependant upon the state.

It’s why the art they esteem is vile and vulgar and often made of feces, urine, and other bodily fluids in the face of the genuine creative complexity and beauty of almost every historic generation.

That’s why they love pandering to Islam, a religion that in mere decades demolished the scientific, cultural, educative, linguistic and architectural achievements that Classical antiquity built over Millenia, today maintaining the Middle East as a violent cesspool from which refugees and asylum seeks pour in the millions each year.

That’s “your ABC”.


When Homosexuality Met Feminism

I can understand why people just give and support the homosexual lobby and their demands.

They are playing the long game and and its wearisome. The Marxists refer to it as “the long march through the institutions of power” and it’s really beginning to pay off and homosexuality is legally deemed the equivalent of marriage and feelings about “gender” become the same thing as biological sex.

The long march through the education system has led to radical social change instituted through government and the legal system.

Now, the Judeo-Christian foundations of our nations are being increasingly substituted with moral relativism and we are at the point where there are enough people in academia to back any claim, no matter how ridiculous or contradictory.

Organisations like Australia’s tax-payer funded news and media organisation, The ABC, are filled with individuals and groups who wholeheartedly agree with this radical Marxist doctrine of social upheaval.

At every opportunity, they post stories and commentary that gives a voice to minority groups like the LGBT community as though they were in fact a significant majority of the population.

They are so blatantly onesided and bold in their distortion of truth than reading their ongoing propaganda can be draining and intimidating, especially when presented through disturbingly biased and manipulative formats such as their “Fact Check” articles.

Their most recent claim is that after a rigorously honest look at the facts, there can be no doubt that homosexual parents are equally as effective as parents in comparison with the biological mother and father of a child.

They tell us these are the facts so this must be the last word on the matter, right?

Should we even bother to try and rebut this anymore? Certainly we should and I will continue to but not here. Many others do a splendid job of that elsewhere.

This stems to the fight between worldviews so it’s better to go straight to the root.

Simply, humanism’s antichrist foundation hates the creator but like the creation and it consequently crosses itself in paradox as it tries to keep its cake and eat it too.

Humanism’s worship of science as the only means to know anything crashes headlong into its postmodern deconstruction of known reality into a buffet of relativity, producing an affirmation and celebration of homosexuality over and against the biological impotence of homosexuality.

And that’s just where the rabbit hole begins…

Consider humanism’s massive contradiction of homosexual marriage and parenting in light of feminism.

The claim that two men can parent a child as well as the biological mother and father leaves a dent in the central tenant of the feminist ideology, which claims women are not only equal to men but must necessarily participate in every level of society to achieve equality.

Apparently that does not extend to marriage and child-rearing where women aren’t actually required at all because, as the religiously humanist ABC attests, two men can do the same job.

So which is it? 

If you are willing to deny the sacred bond between mother and child and say that dad and his male partner offer exactly the same thing, then the logical implication is that men could do the same job in something so trivial as a company or in government and so women aren’t needed there after all…especially after all that complaining about women’s rights and equality.

It all becomes very confusing when you add in “gender”, which means that if you feel like a woman and “identify” as one, then you are one even if you have a penis and testicles.

Would feminists be happy with a company full of people who identify as “women” who all happen to have penises? Or if the government was full of these same penis-equipped “women”?

Feminism seems to rely pretty heavily on a fixed conception of women being women, even though it deconstructs the role of women. Gender, on the other hand, goes super-postmodern and deconstructs the idea of “women” into a feeling and a choice. 

Even if we stick to simple, clearly defined identities based on the archaic idea of different yet compatible biological sexes, can a mother ever teach a son how to be a man and fulfil the desire of a son to have relationship with his father? Can a father do this for his daughter?

If a woman identifies as a man and is in a lesbian relationship, can she teach her son how to love and respect women and how to stand against the natural tendency of men towards either passivity, aggression, and often both?

Is it fair to say that there are actually concrete differences between men and women and that men can’t identify with some things women experience and vice versa?

Or do I, as a man, have the right to talk to women about their periods, their pregnancies, their emotions, their longings, and their weaknesses as though I am a woman because I identify as a woman?

Back to the topic of marriage and raising children, what if there were people out there who refused to identify dangerous lifestyles as dangerous? What if instead, they identified the proven standard of history – a husband and wife for life – as just one inconsequential option among many choices and combinations? 

What if, because of this crazy deconstruction of society through relativism, the vast majority became subject to the insignificant minority, even against the best interests of society as a whole?

And what if, no matter how you identify things, you will one day be accountable for what actually is, not what you feel or want or wish?

This post didn’t end up where I thought it would – just writing about this stuff seems to do that so imagine, if you can, where a society that practises all this will end?


Promoting Ramadan In The West: The Islamic Month Of More Violence Than Usual

Promoting Ramadan is becoming “a thing” in Australia.

Woolworths do it to sell stuff to Muslims and get more money.

The ABC, Australia’s tax-payer funded public broadcaster does it because of their underlying devotion to the failed ideology and social experiment that is multiculturalism. That and because they want to obfuscate the Christian heritage and foundations of Australian society by overemphasizing other religions and cultures so that Christianity becomes just another face in the crowd, relegated to a small slice of the pie or, if possible, none of it.

Multiculturalism helps achieve this end because it asserts that all cultures are equal and that cultural expressions, whether clothing and foods or traditions and values, can exist side by side and be interwoven together, if only people can be forced educated into tolerance and submit to embrace diversity.

Historically, this has rarely been the case. Ultimately, one culture will always prevail over another. In reality, this means the domination of ideas expressed in values and traditions. Food and clothing aren’t so important but ideas define cultures and nations in the most important ways – live or die kind of ways.

So promoting Ramadan is really about promoting a culture and Ramadan is an Islamic expression of worship to the false god of Islam, a culture and value system that radically contradicts that of both Christianity and the secular humanist West.

This ideological war against Christianity makes for strange but not unexpected bedfellows: Islam and atheistic humanism.

But at 2% of Australia’s population, Muslims represent a very small group (consider that 2.5% practise Buddhism)  so for Ramadan to get a mention is somewhat akin to wool knitters getting airtime. Yet you won’t see wool knitters in the media and for good reason – most people don’t care and it doesn’t impact them in any way.

Frankly, Ramadan is no different.

It’s not just media coverage though – it’s messages from the Prime Minister and state Premiers.

If I was a wool knitter, I wouldn’t be holding my breath waiting to hear from Tony Abbott.

Take a read of some of the laughable propaganda regarding Ramadan from the ABC:

 Australian Muslims are gathering at local mosques across the country to celebrate Eid Al-Fitr, the feast that marks the end of Ramadan.

The festival is one of the most joyous days on the Islamic calendar and signals the end of the holy month of Ramadan, a period of 30 days during which all Muslims are obligated to abstain from eating and drinking between dawn and sunset.

Ramadan is observed worldwide and is a period of prayer, fasting and charity for Muslims and its observance is regarded as one of the Five Pillars of Islam.

Maha Abdo, chief executive officer of the Australian Muslim Women’s Association, said Eid was a joyous celebration after a month of prayer and discipline.

“Hopefully with a lot of prayers this morning we’ll be able to seek the acceptance of all our worships for the last 29 days,” she said.

“And also wish and pray for the betterment of all humanity for the month and year to come.”

One of the “most joyous days” huh? I can’t recall that kind of language ever been used in reference to Christianity.

The very fact that they need to explain all these details about Ramadan begs the question of why it’s headline news in the first place.

People don’t know because it has no impact on them. So why report it?

The report continues:

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has sent his best wishes to Muslims across Australia as they come together for Eid.

“The breaking of the fast is a time of joy to be shared with family and friends,” he said.

“By fasting, and through acts of charity, Ramadan encourages Muslims to remember those less fortunate than themselves.

“Australia has long been an exemplar of how people of different faiths and cultures can live harmoniously together and find unity in diversity.

“I send my best wishes to everyone celebrating Eid Al-Fitr.”

About 30,000 people packed the Lakemba mosque and spilled out into the street in Sydney’s south-west, at one of the country’s largest Eid celebrations.

Premier Mike Baird addressed the congregation at the mosque and said Ramadan was an important festival that was “a part of us”.

“A big part of it is the concept of it is that by denying self, there’s an opportunity to reflect on those that are in need and those that are vulnerable and the opportunity to give and support,” Mr Baird said.

“The incredibly important messages that come through this festival are important are important across the city and across the world.”

The Premier said the Muslim community was “part of the NSW family” and the day’s events gave an opportunity to join in with the celebrations.

“The important message is that there are challenges that we’re facing, not just here but across the world, and the way we can deal with them is by coming together,” Mr Baird said.

“That cohesion is the important point – we saw it in events here in Sydney after the Martin Place siege and my hope is that we continue to see that because we’re much stronger when we come together.

“We’re unified in peace and love rather than hate and anger.”

While I would certainly respect a national or state leader speaking to the people they represent, especially the insignificant ones, I’m convinced that this is not why the Muslim community gets special addresses from the Prime Minster.

Like the homosexual community, Muslim minorities in no not-Muslim nations frequently plead victimhood and demand to be heard and treated as a majority rather than the tiny minority that they actually represent. The penalty in the West is the politically correct ad hominems “bigot” or “islamophobe.” Not the kind of labels anyone in politics wants to be hit with, Prime Ministers included.

It’s interesting to note that last point about “unified in peace and love”. It reminds me of those self-help mantras that if spoken enough will come true.

But is peace and love actually a reality or is it self-induced delusion?

Back on the topic of Ramadan though, there is plenty that the ABC News report conveniently overlooks, including the history of Ramadan and what it looks like in nations dominated by Islam.

Consider the below question and response, which explores both of the aforementioned issues:

Question: Why does violence by Muslims increase during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan? It was during Ramadan 2006 that hundreds of Iraqi police were poisoned, obviously by Muslims.

Response: The increased violence was exactly as expected. We are engaged in a war to the death—not against terrorists and extremists who, as President Bush insists, have “hijacked a peaceful religion,” but with Islam itself—a fact that the West refuses to acknowledge. The “politically correct” lies, so popular in the West, must be abandoned. We are losing this war and will continue to do so until the West faces the truth that our enemy is not terrorism perpetrated by Muslim “extremists” but the violent religion of Islam itself!

Ramadan is not, in fact, an Islamic holy month. Not only is it not “holy,” but it did not originate with Muhammad and Islam. Pagan Arabs had observed it for centuries before Muhammad was born. Arab tribes had traditionally refrained from fighting one another at that time. So, why do Muslims fight and kill during Ramadan?

Muhammad began his violent career in Medina, then called Yathrib, a city founded by Jews, in which he killed all of the males and enslaved the women and children. He established himself as the Prophet of Islam with more than 20 murders of those who opposed him, especially poets, whom the Qur’an says are inspired by Satan (Surah 26: 221-26 – a special “revelation” from Allah to justify Muhammad’s murders).

Muhammad’s first three attacks upon rich caravans passing near Yathrib on their way to Mecca were a failure. Then he received another timely “revelation” from Allah, added to the Qur’an, that Muslims could fight during Ramadan (Surah 2:217). His first military success followed. The caravan he attacked was caught by surprise during the agreed-upon “time of peace.” That great success caused Arabs to flock to Muhammad to get in on the booty by joining this new religion of “peace” that allowed fighting during Ramadan!

Muslims still seem to think that Ramadan is a good time for surprise attacks, as we have just seen demonstrated in Iraq and other Muslim countries. Shiites blow themselves up in Sunni mosques as their sure way to paradise, while Sunnis blow themselves up in Shiite mosques as their quick way to paradise. Of course, Sunnis say the attacking Shiites went to hell, while Shiites say the same of Sunni suicide bombers who attack them.

Nor is the concept of Muslims killing Muslims anything new. Three of Muhammad’s first four successors were killed by fellow Muslims. And as this “religion of peace” spread, it only got worse. Through the centuries, hundreds of thousands of Muslims have been killed by fellow Muslims—exactly as they are doing to one another today not only in Iraq but in Afghanistan, Algeria, Pakistan, and wherever Islam exists.

From 1948 to 1973, there were 80 revolutions in the Islamic world, 30 successful, including the murder of 22 heads of state. The Muslim Brotherhood threatened to kill Egypt’s Nasser and succeeded in assassinating Anwar Sadat, a deed that Arafat applauded. In 1971, East Pakistan rebelled against West Pakistan (both Muslim states) and became Bangladesh. In the eight-year war between Iran and Iraq, Muslims used 1,000 tons of poison gas against one another and killed as many as died in World War I. Literally thousands of young school boys died walking through mine fields to clear them for troops with the promise of paradise for becoming “martyrs.” In 1990, we “pagans” had to rescue Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and other Muslim nations from Iraqi Muslims demonstrating Islam’s peacefulness.

Islamic violence during Ramadan began with Muhammad and is supported in the Qur’an. There is not one example in the entire world of Islam ever having brought peace to anyone anywhere except by killing or enslaving the opposition!

The above information begins to make a lot of sense when you hear Muslims threaten to use Ramadan as an opportunity to act out worse than usual and see violence increase during the Eid festival marking the end of Ramadan.

The history of Islam and the significance of Ramadan is there for anyone who isn’t afraid of being labelled an Islamophobe.

And for anyone who isn’t afraid of being labelled a Christian, we have a hope in Jesus Christ that transcends contemporary Australian culture and any poor judgment s our nations makes with regard to Islam and other antichrist ideas.