Syrian Refugee In Germany Burns Down His Hotel Accomodation, Spray Paints Swastikas On Walls To Implicate People Who Warn About The Dangers Of Muslim Refugees

This story is hardly uncommon these days.

It’s all part of Islam in its new home: The West.

A SYRIAN refugee has admitted smearing swastikas and starting a fire at the asylum centre where he was staying because he wanted to be moved to a better location.

The blaze badly damaged the hotel in the town of Bingen am Rhein in Rhineland-Palatina last week

The blaze badly damaged the hotel in the town of Bingen am Rhein in Rhineland-Palatinat, Germany, last week, where a number of refugees and seasonal workers were living.

The apparent racist attack caused outrage in Germany, and was widely reported in local media with demands that those responsible be tracked down and punished. 

The 26-year-old Syrian told police he was fed up with the cramped living conditions in the hotel. 

He had been living there for six months when he started the fire which left four residents and two firefighters needing treatment for smoke inhalation, police revealed.

The refugee sprayed the swastikas on the building in a bid to put responsibility for the blaze on right-wing extremists.

Detectives arrested the man after other residents identified him as the arsonist.

He is currently being held in custody.

His arrest came a secret plan devised by Brussels was revealed, which could see countries in the European Union take on 250,000 migrants from Turkey every single year.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/659981/Syrian-refugee-smeared-swastikas-started-fire-asylum-centre

Daniel Greenfield: “Either There’s Something Wrong Within The [Black] Community. Or America Is Racist.”

Humanity were for most history divided according to geographical location. In those many and varied geographical locations, many and varied appearances, cultures, and religions developed. 

We distinguish this as “ethnicity”.

Within each ethnicity, a general uniformity developed. People generally looked the same, dressed the same, ate the same, valued the same things and acted the same. Most importantly, there was nothing wrong with this whole being seperate and distinct thing.

You like French food? Well, you can get it because of that unique French ethnicity. How about Anime? Thank the Japanese. Do you like oppression and subjugation? Hands together for Islam.

What about the idea that all men are created equal? America, man!

Interestingly, God himself divided the nations and he did so to prevent humanity working together to inevitably evil ends.

Today, humanity has come up with two brilliant ways to reverse God’s division: multiculturalism and the United Nations. Both are equally inane in theory and practise and will inevitably cause ruination to everyone involved in either.

Why?

Because respectively, some ethnicities suck and some can never work together, no matter what.

Now don’t get me wrong – all ethnicities have a suck factor. It’s just that some have more than others while a few have maxed it out.

And here is the one point you need to take away, even if you forget all others: ethnicities never suck (or don’t suck) because of their skin colour. Their suck always, always, always comes from other, non-superficial factors such as their values, beliefs, and practises (and, of course, their food!).

NEVER BECAUSE OF SKIN COLOUR!!!

With that clearly in our mind, we can begin to critically examine the reasons ethnicities suck (frequently due to Marxist-atheisic or Islamic belief) and not get bogged down in the Marxist-inspired politically correct slander of “Racist!”

Let’s target the black community in the United States of America. 

(Now, the only reason skin colour comes into the conversation is because people of one ethnicity frequently gravitate towards people of their own ethnicity, and that’s okay! That’s not racist either.)

There was a time in the US where the black community was largely very respectable. 

Sadly, ethnicities change and in this case, it changed under the duress of cultural Marxism encouraging the ingenious smack down combo of perpetual victimhood status and moral relativity (ie unrestrained immorality).

Remember, this is about belief and practise, not skin colour. 

White society is not in much better shape, being equally impacted and distorted by cultural Marxism and its moral relativity (ie lawlessness) but without the added bonus of shifting all blame for their collective circumstances to another ethnicity.

That’s right – if anything, the burden of being the perpetual perpetrator of all black (or just ALL) social ills has probably worked to keep white society on its toes and a little more humble than other ethnicities. Of course, Marxism would never deliberately instill humility – it just couldn’t be avoided in the blame shifting process.

Anyway, here’s Daniel Greenfield with another outstanding dissection of reality:

There are two ways to look at the problems of the black community. Either there’s something wrong within the community. Or America is racist.

The sensible liberals who used to be able to split the difference are dead or purged. The Moynihan Report is inconceivable in a Democratic Party which has gone all in on freeing drug dealers and bulking up the welfare state. Obama mentioned fatherlessness briefly in his Brother’s Keeper speech before pivoting to a call to dismantle the criminal justice system and school discipline policies.

Obama admitted that, “We won’t be living up to our ideals when their parents are struggling with substance abuse, or are in prison, or unemployed, and when fathers are absent.” But his solution is freeing drug dealers “who could be good fathers and good neighbors and good fellow citizens” if only they weren’t “languishing in prison over minor, nonviolent drug offenses.”

Some recent examples of such potential “good fathers” whom he freed include Vander Keith Gore, the son of a Democratic councilman who ran a drug ring which threatened to murder a cooperating witness’ baby. He freed Isadore Gennings, whose “minor nonviolent drug offenses” involved helping move $2.5 million in cocaine, Carmel Bretous, who helped smuggle in 110 pounds of cocaine, and Tommie Sand Tyree, who was described as having “a lot of blood on his hands.”

Freeing drug dealers also means that that there will be more parents “struggling with substance abuse” and that “drugs are plentiful.” But making matters in the black community worse was always the plan.

Last year, Obama called for going easy on violent criminals just like in Europe where 10 years for murder is considered a severe sentence. The length of prison sentences for rape would also have to be cut by at least 20 percent to comply with European standards. And when these “good fellow citizens” get out, they have a right to be your “good murderer neighbor” or “good rapist neighbor.”

Obama’s HUD has warned landlords that criminals are protected under the Fair Housing Act since due to “widespread racial and ethnic disparities in the U.S. criminal justice system, criminal history-based restrictions on access to housing are likely disproportionately to burden African-Americans and Hispanics”. Freeing black drug dealers also disproportionately burdens the African-American communities where they do business and shoot each other, and denying safe homes to black families living in the areas where criminals are most likely to set up shop is equally terrible.

But there is no moral logic at work here. Only the remorseless political logic of progressive power.

Disparate impact is the monster lurking in the cellar of civil rights. Once you reject the idea that black communities and individuals bear any responsibility for their actions, any disparate impact can only be due to racism. Poverty, broken families, higher crime rates and school discipline rates are purely the products of racial bias. And their existence justifies unlimited government intervention.

Inflicting misery on black people empowers government. This is the twisted liberal version of slavery.

Many black reformers understood that civil rights was less about helping them than about endowing white liberals with unlimited power in a world where the nationwide economic disaster that allowed FDR to impose the New Deal’s drastic economic authority no longer seemed likely to recur. Sensible reformers like Senator Moynihan who actually wanted to holistically tackle the problems of the black community would always be outnumbered by fake outraged reformers who wanted to worsen them. 

If everything is racist, then everything must be controlled. We can see that on campuses where political correctness has outlawed everything from Halloween costumes to raising your hand in safe spaces. But disparate impact is the perfect weapon for imposing unlimited control over everything nationwide.

Disparate impact is the perfect Swiss Army Knife of the totalitarian left because it can be applied to anything. Disparate effect can be used to argue that crime rates are the product of racism and that the entire criminal justice system must be overhauled until arrest, trial and conviction rates are equal across racial lines. And until this impossible outcome can be achieved, it also means that anything that disproportionately impacts criminals is also racist.

That means background checks for jobs and apartment rentals. And of course it doesn’t stop there.

School graduation rates must also be made equivalent. And until that somehow happens, hiring only high school or college graduates is a policy that also has a disproportionate racial impact. If you think this is farfetched, the Supreme Court in 1971 ruled that a high school diploma requirement is racist. A few years ago the EEOC claimed that requiring a high school diploma might also violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. A year earlier, the EEOC insisted that a trucking company was in violation of the ADA for suspending an alcoholic truck driver and referring him to substance abuse counseling.

Define a persecuted class, whether it’s drug dealers or alcoholics, then reverse cause and effect, and even the most common sense courses of action become forms of discrimination to be controlled.

And then we end up with a right for rapists to rent your ground floor and drivers with a drinking problem to drive eighteen-wheelers next to your compact car.

As long as a problem exists, it will have a disparate impact. And the worse the disparate impact, the more power can be amassed in addressing it. But the disparate impact is the effect, not the cause. Reversing cause and effect allows the government to go into business fighting the various outcomes of problems, whether it’s alcoholism or fatherlessness, without ever addressing the actual causes.

And to worsen those causes to increase misery and inflate their own power whenever they can.

An Urban Institute report a few years ago found that, “The percentage of black children born to unmarried mothers… tripled between the early 1960s and 2009.” The findings in the Moynihan Report have only grown worse and the fundamental causes have not changed. Without healthy families, there can be no healthy communities. And without healthy families and communities, there will be far fewer healthy individuals. Crime and unemployment rates will continue to be “disproportionately” high.

And that’s a free gift to a political movement built on destroying the black community for fun and profit, expanding the scope of its own power and organizations by creating and feeding off human misery.

The road ahead is simple. Worsen the problems in the black community. Promise to treat them by expanding the scope of disparate impact to address any interaction between the negative social outcomes and the rest of the country until everything is racist and everything is controlled.

That’s the way to deprive everyone of their rights and their futures under the guise of civil rights.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262413/everything-racist-everything-must-be-controlled-daniel-greenfield

Humanity were for most history divided according to geographical location. In those many and varied geographical locations, many and varied appearances, cultures, and religions developed. 

We distinguish this as “ethnicity”.

Within each ethnicity, a general uniformity developed. People generally looked the same, dressed the same, ate the same, valued the same things and acted the same. Most importantly, there was nothing wrong with this whole being seperate and distinct thing.

You like French food? Well, you can get it because of that unique French ethnicity. How about Anime? Thank the Japanese. Do you like oppression and subjugation? Hands together for Islam.

What about the idea that all men are created equal? America, man!

Interestingly, God himself divided the nations and he did so to prevent humanity working together to inevitably evil ends.

Today, humanity has come up with two brilliant ways to reverse God’s division: multiculturalism and the United Nations. Both are equally inane in theory and practise and will inevitably cause ruination to everyone involved in either.

Why?

Because respectively, some ethnicities suck and some can never work together, no matter what.

Now, don’t get me wrong – all ethnicities have a suck factor. It’s just that some have more than others while a few have maxed it out.

And here is the one point you need to take away, even if you forget all others: ethnicities never suck (or don’t suck) because of their skin colour. Their suck always, always, always comes from other, non-superficial factors such as their values, beliefs, and practises (and, of course, their food!).

NEVER BECAUSE OF SKIN COLOUR!!!

With that clearly in our mind, we can begin to critically examine the reasons ethnicities suck and not get bogged down in the Marxist-inspired politically correct slander of “Racist!”

Let’s target the black community in the United States of America. 

(Now, the only reason skin colour comes into the conversation is because people of one ethnicity frequently gravitate towards people of their own ethnicity, and that’s okay! That’s not racist either.)

There was a time in the US where the black community was largely very respectable. 

Sadly, ethnicities change and in this case, it changed under the duress of cultural Marxism encouraging the ingenious smack down combo of perpetual victimhood status and moral relativity (ie unrestrained immorality).

Remember, this is about belief and practise, not skin colour. 

White society is not in much better shape, being equally impacted and distorted by cultural Marxism and its moral relativity (ie lawlessness) but without the added bonus of shifting all blame for their collective circumstances to another ethnicity.

That’s right – if anything, the burden of being the perpetual perpetrator of all black (or just ALL) social ills has probably worked to keep white society on its toes and a little more humble than other ethnicities. Of course, Marxism would never deliberately instill humility – it just couldn’t be avoided in the blame shifting process.

Anyway, here’s Daniel Greenfield with another outstanding dissection of reality:

There are two ways to look at the problems of the black community. Either there’s something wrong within the community. Or America is racist.

The sensible liberals who used to be able to split the difference are dead or purged. The Moynihan Report is inconceivable in a Democratic Party which has gone all in on freeing drug dealers and bulking up the welfare state. Obama mentioned fatherlessness briefly in his Brother’s Keeper speech before pivoting to a call to dismantle the criminal justice system and school discipline policies.

Obama admitted that, “We won’t be living up to our ideals when their parents are struggling with substance abuse, or are in prison, or unemployed, and when fathers are absent.” But his solution is freeing drug dealers “who could be good fathers and good neighbors and good fellow citizens” if only they weren’t “languishing in prison over minor, nonviolent drug offenses.”

Some recent examples of such potential “good fathers” whom he freed include Vander Keith Gore, the son of a Democratic councilman who ran a drug ring which threatened to murder a cooperating witness’ baby. He freed Isadore Gennings, whose “minor nonviolent drug offenses” involved helping move $2.5 million in cocaine, Carmel Bretous, who helped smuggle in 110 pounds of cocaine, and Tommie Sand Tyree, who was described as having “a lot of blood on his hands.”

Freeing drug dealers also means that that there will be more parents “struggling with substance abuse” and that “drugs are plentiful.” But making matters in the black community worse was always the plan.

Last year, Obama called for going easy on violent criminals just like in Europe where 10 years for murder is considered a severe sentence. The length of prison sentences for rape would also have to be cut by at least 20 percent to comply with European standards. And when these “good fellow citizens” get out, they have a right to be your “good murderer neighbor” or “good rapist neighbor.”

Obama’s HUD has warned landlords that criminals are protected under the Fair Housing Act since due to “widespread racial and ethnic disparities in the U.S. criminal justice system, criminal history-based restrictions on access to housing are likely disproportionately to burden African-Americans and Hispanics”. Freeing black drug dealers also disproportionately burdens the African-American communities where they do business and shoot each other, and denying safe homes to black families living in the areas where criminals are most likely to set up shop is equally terrible.

But there is no moral logic at work here. Only the remorseless political logic of progressive power.

Disparate impact is the monster lurking in the cellar of civil rights. Once you reject the idea that black communities and individuals bear any responsibility for their actions, any disparate impact can only be due to racism. Poverty, broken families, higher crime rates and school discipline rates are purely the products of racial bias. And their existence justifies unlimited government intervention.

Inflicting misery on black people empowers government. This is the twisted liberal version of slavery.

Many black reformers understood that civil rights was less about helping them than about endowing white liberals with unlimited power in a world where the nationwide economic disaster that allowed FDR to impose the New Deal’s drastic economic authority no longer seemed likely to recur. Sensible reformers like Senator Moynihan who actually wanted to holistically tackle the problems of the black community would always be outnumbered by fake outraged reformers who wanted to worsen them. 

If everything is racist, then everything must be controlled. We can see that on campuses where political correctness has outlawed everything from Halloween costumes to raising your hand in safe spaces. But disparate impact is the perfect weapon for imposing unlimited control over everything nationwide.

Disparate impact is the perfect Swiss Army Knife of the totalitarian left because it can be applied to anything. Disparate effect can be used to argue that crime rates are the product of racism and that the entire criminal justice system must be overhauled until arrest, trial and conviction rates are equal across racial lines. And until this impossible outcome can be achieved, it also means that anything that disproportionately impacts criminals is also racist.

That means background checks for jobs and apartment rentals. And of course it doesn’t stop there.

School graduation rates must also be made equivalent. And until that somehow happens, hiring only high school or college graduates is a policy that also has a disproportionate racial impact. If you think this is farfetched, the Supreme Court in 1971 ruled that a high school diploma requirement is racist. A few years ago the EEOC claimed that requiring a high school diploma might also violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. A year earlier, the EEOC insisted that a trucking company was in violation of the ADA for suspending an alcoholic truck driver and referring him to substance abuse counseling.

Define a persecuted class, whether it’s drug dealers or alcoholics, then reverse cause and effect, and even the most common sense courses of action become forms of discrimination to be controlled.

And then we end up with a right for rapists to rent your ground floor and drivers with a drinking problem to drive eighteen-wheelers next to your compact car.

As long as a problem exists, it will have a disparate impact. And the worse the disparate impact, the more power can be amassed in addressing it. But the disparate impact is the effect, not the cause. Reversing cause and effect allows the government to go into business fighting the various outcomes of problems, whether it’s alcoholism or fatherlessness, without ever addressing the actual causes.

And to worsen those causes to increase misery and inflate their own power whenever they can.

An Urban Institute report a few years ago found that, “The percentage of black children born to unmarried mothers… tripled between the early 1960s and 2009.” The findings in the Moynihan Report have only grown worse and the fundamental causes have not changed. Without healthy families, there can be no healthy communities. And without healthy families and communities, there will be far fewer healthy individuals. Crime and unemployment rates will continue to be “disproportionately” high.

And that’s a free gift to a political movement built on destroying the black community for fun and profit, expanding the scope of its own power and organizations by creating and feeding off human misery.

The road ahead is simple. Worsen the problems in the black community. Promise to treat them by expanding the scope of disparate impact to address any interaction between the negative social outcomes and the rest of the country until everything is racist and everything is controlled.

That’s the way to deprive everyone of their rights and their futures under the guise of civil rights.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262413/everything-racist-everything-must-be-controlled-daniel-greenfield

#AbortionSoBlack Because As Margaret Sanger Says: Blacks Are “Human Weeds”

So you’ve been tweeting #OscarsSoWhite to your hearts content and you love the great work Planned Parenthood have been illegally trading.

Whoa dude: paradoxical dilemma!

Perhaps it time you started tweeting #AbortionSoBlack because black babies seem to feature as heavily in abortion clinics as non-blacks do on Academy Award nomination lists.

Pro-abortion activists are again storming Washington D.C. as the Supreme Court hears arguments regarding a Texas law they consider too restrictive on abortion. It boggles my mind how desperately people will fight for the right to kill their own babies.

Most of the activists honestly think this is an argument about choice. They demand freedom in their reproductive lives. Hey, here’s a news flash. You already have it. But the choice is not to be made after the life is conceived, it is to be made before the reproductive act begins. But that is for another article.

To understand this crusade of death, simply look at the mother of the abortion movement, Margaret Sanger. Today’s liberal spin touts Sanger as a woman of strong convictions fighting for woman’s rights. She’s credited with educating the world on birth control and sex. I would like to continue that biography with actual facts, including her own words.

Sanger lived in Greenwich Village with her husband, William, where she rubbed elbows with New York elites like Socialist/Democrat Upton Sinclair and anarchist Emma Goldman. Sanger was a member of groups like the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party and the Liberal Club.

After finding herself in legal trouble, she fled to Europe where she had affairs with eugenics supporter Havelock Ellis and socialist H.G. Wells. While there, her progressive lovers and friends taught her how to use the compassion of family planning as a guise to persuade people to their cause. See, their objective wasn’t birth control to help the burdened family. It was to force their progressive ideology on society and wipe out those who were inferior, which was basically Blacks and other non-Whites, the physically and mentally inadequate, the physically and mentally handicap, and the poor.

Upon her return to the states, Sanger rolled up her sleeves and got right to work in pushing her doctrine of the perfect race. In a 1915 handbook targeting teenagers, she wrote, “Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence.” Does that sound like compassionate family planning or choice to you?  

In fact, she was so for a woman’s right to choose she wrote the following in “Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108):

-The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.

The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.

-Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense— defending the unborn against their own disabilities

In an article for American Weekly, Sanger provided the following insight in: “America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934. 

    Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

    Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

    Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

So who is the “unfit” in Article 1? According to Sanger, “Non-Aryan people [of the United States are] a great biological menace to the future of civilization.” Blacks she characterized as “human weeds”. In fact, this is so paramount to Sanger’s own brainchild, Planned Parenthood, that 79% of their abortion clinics target Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. If Planned Parenthood is about choice, why are they so focused on killing minorities?

In 2012, New York City aborted more Black babies than were actually born. In fact, abortions to Black mothers made up 42.4% of the babies killed while Hispanics comprised another 31%. Together 73% of New York City’s abortions were of these two minority groups alone. Congratulations Margaret Sanger and pro-choice advocates.

Articles 4 and 6 have nothing to do with choice. They are the antithesis of it. Proposing no woman has a “legal right to bear a child,” sounds more like enslavement than reproductive freedom. Demanding a “permit for parenthood” is anything but personal choice. It is a superiority dogma professed by progressive elitists who claim understanding and kindness to the very population they wish to terminate.

We all gasp at and repudiate the horrific actions of the Nazi’s against the Jews, but guess where they learned it from. Good old, Margaret Sanger and her eugenics friends right here in America. In fact, between 1907 and 1963, over 60,000 people were involuntarily sterilized in the United States under American law. Choice? I think not.

The movement of sterilization and segregation was not as popular as Sanger had hoped, especially after World War II. She had to find another way to rid the earth of the “unfit.” She had to convince the mothers to voluntarily terminate their own babies. Enter abortion.

Margaret SangerSanger was so invested in reducing, if not irradiating, the Black population, she found friends and allies in the KKK and other similar groups. She even enlisted Blacks themselves. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, an heir of Proctor and Gamble, Sanger wrote the following: 

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” 

So while you pro-choice people rally for your right to kill your offspring, know the woman who started it all did so because she thought you were stupid, unfit, diseased, inferior, and quite frankly, not good enough to reproduce. Sure, she did it under the guise of giving you the illusion of freedom in controlling how many children you have, but make no mistake, she did whatever she had to so you would proudly kill your own baby. It didn’t matter to her why you did it. She was only concerned about making sure you did do it.

There is nothing more diseased than a society that celebrates the execution of their own children. After seeing the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood selling aborted babies like a stolen car disassembled for parts, how can anyone still argue Planned Parenthood is a company worth supporting? It is morally equivalent to saying, “Nazis may have killed 6 million Jews, but they built the autobahn.” I, for one, think it is about time to abort, disassemble, and sell off Margaret Sanger’s most precious baby.  

But that’s just my 2 cents.

http://constitution.com/shocking-quotes-from-planned-parenthood-founder/

#NBASoBlack: Time To Boycott The NBA?

The double standards applied by Leftists (Marxists) is hilarious and there are plenty of articles coming out exposing the blatant hypocrisy of Hollywoodites calling for a snub of the Oscars over the absence of black nominees.

Here is a great one:

Jada Pinka and Spike Lee are calling on their fellow-black friends to boycott the Academy Awards because there were no black nominees. It’s not that blacks have not not been nominated in the past. Here’s a list from Wikipedia. Most people would be surprised at the number of black actors and actresses nominated and blacks who have won an Academy Award.

“Denzel Washington has the most nominations for an African-American Actor: Best Actor (4 nominations) and Best Supporting Actor (2 nominations).”

Will Smith was nominated in 2001 for Ali and 2006 for Pursuit of Happyness.

Jamie Foxx was the First African-American actor to receive two acting nominations in the same year. He won Best Actor for Ray and for Best Supporting Actor for Collateral, a film that Jada Pinkett Smith, wife of Will Smith, starred in.

Were there some worthy Oscar performances in 2015? I thought Chiwetel Ejiofor did a fantastic job in The Martian. I did not see Will Smith’s performance in Concussion.

In 2002, the best actress was Halle Berry and best actor Denzel Washington.

Actually, I haven’t watched the Academy Awards for decades. It’s been that long since I’ve become disenchanted with the rubbish that comes out of Hollywood and the hypocrisy of so many leftist Hollywood actors and actresses. I’m upset that two nominations were given to the transgender flick Carol. So much of Hollywood is agenda-driven.

Liberals talk about how bad it is to objectify women, and yet films are filled with objectified women. Liberal Hollywood types support more gun control but have their own armed security and perform in films with hordes of gun violence scenes.

Demographics might have something to do with the interest level among black movie goers: “According to a 2014 study (PDF), 25% of frequent moviegoers were Hispanic, 10% were African-American.” (H/T: CNN) If any group should be ticked off it’s the Hispanics.

The Academy itself is mostly white males. I don’t know what the Academy makeup was when Berry and Washington won. Will there now be Affirmative Action nominees? Will the Academy be pressured to nominate blacks because of fear of boycotts?

This fight is a Hollywood problem, but it’s typical of how things are done in the United States: Identity first, public pressure second, talent third, and character fourth or at all.

Life’s not fair. We live in a right-handed world. When is the last time you saw a left-handed catcher in baseball? (I’ve only seen one.) Try to find a left-handed catcher’s mitt.

Scissors are made for righties. Left-handed baseball players rarely if ever play third or second base or shortstop. And yet left-handed pitchers are sought after.

The world is also made for tall people. A child’s first trip to an amusement park is often met with sadness because he or she is not tall enough to ride some of the more exhilarating attractions.

Growing up in the suburbs of Pittsburgh, there was a large swimming pool facility. The lifeguards were always telling short kids to stay out of the deep end. The only way you could get in was prove you could swim the length of the pool. Tall kids didn’t have to do it. Rank discrimination!

When I was in school, we always had to line up shortest to tallest. I think about how my life would be different if I had been 5’ 6” like my father rather than 6’ 1”. Being short is a plus for gymnasts and jockeys.

Try playing basketball today if you’re 6 feet tall. You might make the high school team, but the pros are likely not to take you unless you’re as good as Tyrone “Muggsy” Bogues (5’ 3”) or Anthony “Spud” Webb – 5’7″.

Blacks dominate the sprints and jumping events in track and field. Big guys, black and white, dominate the throwing events. The high school record holder in the shot put is black and very big. His record may never be broken.

The NBA is dominated by tall black men. “According to racial equality activist Richard Lapchick, the NBA in 2011 was composed of 83 percent non-white players, including 78 percent black, four percent Latino, and one percent Asian; 17 percent of the players were white. The league had the highest percentage of black players of any major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada.” It’s about the same for the NFL.

Try being a model if you don’t have “the look.”

You’re probably not going to make it in the music business if you don’t look good. There are exceptions, however. In the end, talent is the key, but it’s not always enough for some markets. Remember this from Simon Cowell and ‘Britain’s Got Talent’?

“Simon Cowell sneered and the huge audience at the ‘Britain’s Got Talent’ show made the sort of faces associated with a bad smell. The object of their disaffection was contestant No. 43212, a plain, middle-aged woman from Scotland with bushy eyebrows and a dress and hairdo that might have been stylish when Dwight Eisenhower was president.

“The woman, who seemed somewhat unnerved by the bright lights and the big crowd in the concert hall where the show was recorded, said she was Susan Boyle. She said she was 47 years old, unemployed, and lived alone with her cat, Pebbles. She had never gone on a date and had never been kissed, she added in a thick brogue.”

It was her abilities that wowed the judges and the audience. If you haven’t seen and heard this, then you’re in for a treat.

https://youtu.be/RxPZh4AnWyk

http://godfatherpolitics.com/27999/stop-watching-the-nba-not-enough-white-players/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_black_Academy_Award_winners_and_nominees

…Because “Racism” Is Why We Don’t Like Islam

You gotta love the doublespeak of the mainstream media, especially the tax-payer funded ABC, which makes a living out of lying about social issues to push its extreme left agenda. 

In all cases, “extreme left” is synonymous with the power to silence anyone who disagrees with supporting everything anti-Christian, anti-Western, and anti-truth, like homosexuality being healthy and safe, socialism being a fair and just system that brings joy to all the comrades, or that gender is the same as biological sex and perfectly fluid according to your feelings.

In this particular case, it means falsely accusing Australians who don’t want a mosque built in their suburbs as “racist”…because Islam, a worldview and system encompassing the political, religious, and social is a race?

Here’s their report:

Community groups have rallied in support of tolerance and against racism in the central Victorian city of Bendigo after the approval of a controversial mosque.

Three anti-racism groups held rallies in opposition to a protest by the anti-Islam group United Patriots Front (UPF), which opposes the mosque.

Large numbers of police officers were on the scene to keep the two sides apart.

A small scuffle broke out at the Shamrock Hotel as protesters walked through town but police stepped in quickly, reporters at the scene said.

The anti-racism demonstrators chanted: “Muslims are welcome, racists are not.”

Members of the UPF vowed they would go “wherever they wanted because this land belongs to us” in a posting on Facebook before the protest.

Victoria’s planning tribunal approved a permit for the city’s first mosque earlier this month despite stiff opposition to the project from local residents.

The Victorian and Civil Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) found there was “no evidence of any significant social or other effects to the community” as a result of the mosque.

But VCAT imposed a series of conditions on the development, including caps on the number of people allowed on site at specific times, a height limit of 21.4 metres for the mosque’s minaret, and restrictions on the opening hours.

Now pretending Islam is a race is not a mere mistake or misunderstanding on behalf of the ABC – they know Islam is not a race.

This is all part of getting you and me to SHUT UP!

And the way they do it is perpetuate the narrative that white people are responsible for all problems in the world, especially the catastrophically and ongoingly troubled Middle East.

Now, some white people are racists and some of them, past tense – as in no white people currently alive today – did contribute to the African slave trade but there’s two important points that we must take into account:

  1. “White people” are not some homogenous collective who all agree on everything, like being racist, as the left perpetually claim.
  2. Muslims created the African slave trade in line with the slavery practised by Muhammad and are now protected used by the left.

The left is an ideology focussed on obtaining power to control every sphere of society from a governmental level and the effective way they have discovered is through abusing and falsely accusing people into silence.

Nobody wants to be know as a “racist” and most people don’t like to be put on public display in a negative way and so screaming abuse with the amplification of the powerful and ever-present mainstream media means that you will be publicly shamed and condemned, whether you are really “racist” or not.

Small Muslim communities won’t cause much trouble but with the Middle East as our prime example, large communities of them are the worst disaster civilisation has encountered.

Don’t take my word for it – the sheer volume of terrorist attacks since 9/11, again primarily in the Middle East, speak for themselves:


Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-29/bendigo-protests-over-mosque/6734702
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com

Curt Schilling Is Right About Islam

There is a hard-to-imagine time centuries ago when the West was comprised of nations filled with warriors who had stemmed the bloody cascade of Islamic conquest.
How things change.

The 20th century West was one that became ignorant to Islam and familiar with excessive prosperity. When Muslims performed the brutal wake-up call of 9/11, we suddenly became aware of Islam again – only this time we were the fattest, most bloated culture that ever existed. 

Instead of taking to the ideological gym after our glimpse in the mirror, we sought any way to placate a violent religion that has declared its intent to mince our collective nations into balls. After all, getting off the couch of comfort would take work and that’s sounds unpleasant.

So now, a mere decade and a half since Islam knocked on our door with fire and blood, the West is bowing the knee in submission to Islam which, in no twist of irony, means “submission”.

Part of that knee bowing includes screaming “RACIST” at anyone who even thinks about criticism Islam.

Robert Spencer reports yet another example:

CURT SCHILLING AND THE DEATH OF FREE SPEECH

He told the truth. He apologized. It still wasn’t enough.

“Curt Schilling’s tweet comparing Muslims to Nazis is even worse than it sounds,” howled Max Fisher in Vox – one of the many voices this week screaming for Schilling’s head for transgressing against America’s new and unwritten, but nonetheless frightfully draconian, speech codes.

Fisher professes ignorance of the perp’s illustrious career, semaphoring that he is a good Leftist elitist, ignorant of Schilling’s brutish, bourgeois athletic achievements: “Curt Schilling, whom Wikipedia informs me is a former baseball star and current ESPN commentator, sent a tweet on Tuesday that seems to have emerged straight from the internet nether-void of racist email forwards.”

“Racist”? Schilling tweeted a graphic that read, “It’s said only 5-10% of Muslims are extremists. In 1940, only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How’d that go?” So where is the “racism”? What race are “extremist Muslims”? What race are Muslims in the aggregate? What race is Islam? Or did Fisher mean that Schilling’s tweet was racist against Germans? 

Fisher compounds this muddled thinking by doubling down on the false claim in his headline, that Schilling likened Muslims to Nazis: “The argument here is pretty clear, even if the numbers are pure nonsense, but just so it’s not lost: Schilling is saying that the religion of Islam is akin to Nazi Germany, and that the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims are responsible for the actions of a tiny minority of extremists in the same way that Nazi-era Germans were complicit in Nazi crimes.”

Actually, Schilling’s tweet does neither of those things. It likens not the religion of Islam, but “extremist Muslims,” to Nazis, and it doesn’t say a think about all Muslims being responsible for the crimes of Islamic jihadists. And Fisher’s woolly logic is typical of the firestorm that has engulfed Schilling, as he has been removed from ESPN’s coverage of the Little League World Series and is being pilloried everywhere. Schilling himself is repentant and apologetic, but it may do no good: he may be facing more punishment, and is taking a beating in the mainstream media for being “insensitive.”

But what exactly is so offensive about his tweet? Is it that he compared “extremist Muslims” to Nazis? Surely that can’t be it. The Islamic State hasn’t murdered six million Jews, but surely would if it could, and meanwhile its gleeful bloodlust, sex slavery, terrorizing of non-Muslims and all the rest of it make the comparison reasonable.

Or was Schilling “insensitive” for daring to suggest that peaceful Muslims aren’t doing much to rein in their violent coreligionists? Well, let’s see. Last month, Muslims in Ireland held a demonstration against the Islamic State. How many Muslims showed up? Fewer than fifty. And in October 2014 in Houston, a rally against the Islamic State organized by the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) drew the grand total of ten people. In August 2013 in Boston, about 25 Muslims rallied against “misperceptions” that Islam was violent. About the same number showed up in June 2013 at a progressive Muslim rally in Toronto to claim that their religion had been “hijacked.”

And back in 2005, a group called the Free Muslims Coalition held what it dubbed a “Free Muslims March Against Terror,” intending to “send a message to the terrorists and extremists that their days are numbered … and to send a message to the people of the Middle East, the Muslim world and all people who seek freedom, democracy and peaceful coexistence that we support them.” In the run-up to the event it got enthusiastic national and international publicity, but it ended up drawing about twenty-five people.

Contrast those paltry showings to the thousands of Muslims who have turned out for rallies against cartoons of Muhammad or against Israel. Here are some headlines from the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo jihad massacre of Muhammad cartoonists in January 2015:

Chechnya: 800,000 Muslims protest Muhammad cartoons; protests also in Iran, Pakistan, Ingushetia, elsewhere

Pakistan: 10,000 Muslims protest against Charlie Hebdo’s Muhammad cartoons

Australia: 1,000 Muslims rally against Charlie Hebdo and the freedom of speech

Kyrgyztsan: 1,000 Muslims rally: “I am not Charlie, I love my Prophet.”

But given a chance to show how Muslims overwhelmingly reject “extremism,” only a handful show up.

So Fisher and the other Leftists gleefully stomping on Schilling’s professional corpse today should explain how exactly he was offensive or insensitive (aside from having been a member of the 2001 Arizona Diamondbacks and 2004 Boston Red Sox). ESPN should restore him to active duty immediately, but it is much more likely that they will force him to issue a groveling apology first, or just fire him outright.

The savaging of Curt Schilling is disquieting proof of what I’ve pointed out many times over the years: that anyone and everyone who dares to speak a word against jihad terror will inevitably be mauled in the public square, and charged with “racism,” “bigotry” and “Islamophobia” – despite the fact that everyone, including the leading Muslim groups in the U.S., are supposed to be against jihad terror. Schilling, unprepared for the onslaught, backed down immediately, thereby reinforcing the usefulness of this firestorm as a tactic. 

The ultimate goal is to inhibit all criticism of jihad terror, so that the jihad imperative can advance unimpeded. We’re well on the way there.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/259927/curt-schilling-and-death-free-speech-robert-spencer

Muslims: The Perpetual Faux-Victims Of Westerners?

While scouring the ABC News website for any mention of Planned Parenthood’s horrific crimes is like finding a needle in the ocean, they have managed to throw a forum concerning anti-Muslim “racism” and “hate crimes” into their top ten list of important news items concerning Australia:

Nasrin Amin did not know Martin Place gunman Man Haron Monis but during December’s deadly siege the Melbourne IT worker said she felt his actions personally.

Racism hurts”, she told a 200-strong crowd at a forum on Islamophobia in the Melbourne suburb of Coburg on Sunday.

Ms Amin wears a black veil that covers half of her face. She organised the awareness forum in part because of her personal experience, and because of the stories she heard of other Muslim women who have been attacked.

Incidents included having their scarves pulled off them, and in one case, a woman had coffee thrown on her.

“From a victim’s point of view, Islamophobia is racism,” Ms Amin said.

“People can say Islam is not a race … but from a victim’s point of view this kind of abuse … affects our lives, how we go on with our daily lives.”

Melbourne’s Muslim community is increasingly concerned about anti-Islamic sentiment.

Now, I do not in any way support any kind of violence or intimidation against anyone and that includes Muslims. I do not believe the term “racism” is even worth using because we have been scientifically proven to be fully and equally human (despite the long-held teachings of Darwinian evolution that persist to this day) and since we are all made equally in God’s image, the only thing that differentiates us is what we believe and consequently, how we behave.

Nonetheless, I will use the term simply for the sake of engaging in the ongoing bombardment of white, Western nations with this vile and often false ad hominem.

With that clear, let’s dig into why this “news report” is typical leftist collectivising, race-baiting rubbish.
The claim is a “200-strong crowd” but the image attached to the article suggests an interestingly empty hall. The ABC, along with other mainstream media outlets, seem to have a habit of overestimating events like this and significantly underestimating numbers at pro-life and pro-marriage events.

It’s worth noting that typical blinding bias when it comes to these kind of things, especially since this is in the ABC’s top ten news item list, a place you will never find the aforementioned.

From the point of view of using words and definitions correctly, Islam is not a race or an ethnicity so why does Amin and others insist on implying that it is, almost as though they are seeking to capitalise on the silencing power of accusing white people of being “racists”?

If it is true that Amin has been physically and verbally abused, then of course this is wrong. However, when it comes to both the ABC and Muslim reports of “racist attacks” against Muslims, I remain in a constant state of doubt and suspicion and for good reason, especially given how leftist-types with plenty of free time head out there to feign racial abuse and hate crimes on the street.

Even if this particular case is real, it does not justify adding to the leftist doublespeak that confuses the blatantly clear divide between biological appearance and personal religious belief, especially when the religious belief in question has killed 240 million people in the last fourteen centuries and often through unimaginably cruelty and brutality which continues even today.
There is no clearer way to say it: race is unchangeable and does not impact the way you behave while religion is a personal belief that determines values and behaviours. Race cannot be morally evil while many religions clearly are.

Forums on “anti-Islamic sentiment” somehow ring hollow in light of the reality that very few, if any, Muslims seem to actually come to any harm at the hands of Westerners – if they did, the media would never let us hear the end of it!

Furthermore, the countless Islamic terrorist attacks that occur every day in nations across the world where both Westerners and Muslims are murdered drives my point home – Muslims are almost always the perpetrators of racism, terror acts, and crime against Westerners (and others!) and not the other way around.

Therefore, “Islamophobia” actually seems to be a rational fear as opposed to an irrational one implied by “phobia” specifically because Islam is responsible for an incalculable number of deaths, most of which are designed to terrorise people.

There is certainly a great opportunity for the church to build relationships with Muslims and show them the loving kindness that Christ Jesus shows us.

However, we do not have to accept the constant accusations of racism, Islamophobia, sexism, homophobia, etc that the leftist media and some Muslim communities label us with just because we are white Westerners.

That is the only confirmed racism occurring here.

Once again, the ABC elevates a news story that has almost zero interest to the general population of Australia all for the sake of continuing to label white Australians as racists, this time at the hands of supposed Muslim victims.

Leftist thrive on social division, pitting black against white, men against women, everybody against Christians, all because they can only sow disorder and chaos. The left cannot build anything for itself, only tear down and deface.

It’s why they hate marriage and promote anything that safeguards it, whether divorce or adultery, homosexuality or polygamy, pornography and anything else that breaks up families, destroys their financial independence, and makes them dependant upon the state.

It’s why the art they esteem is vile and vulgar and often made of feces, urine, and other bodily fluids in the face of the genuine creative complexity and beauty of almost every historic generation.

That’s why they love pandering to Islam, a religion that in mere decades demolished the scientific, cultural, educative, linguistic and architectural achievements that Classical antiquity built over Millenia, today maintaining the Middle East as a violent cesspool from which refugees and asylum seeks pour in the millions each year.

That’s “your ABC”.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-09/islamophobia/6684144
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Fake_Anti-Muslim_Hate_Crimes_and_Other_Lies

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/man-pretends-racist-part-social-4536571
http://www.bookwormroom.com/2013/12/12/the-paradox-of-leftist-utopianism-and-its-dystopian-art/

Obama Promised “Change”: Half A Decade Of Inciting Racial Hatred And Violence

Black lives matter in so much as they can lead the left into positions of power but we would be fools to think they actually cared about groups that are collectivized according to superficial skin colour.

Like the proletariat to the almost exclusively bourgeoise Marxist leaders of old, ‘black lives” represents a group of people who can be exploited to position themselves into the government, media, and other stations of power in our society. Sadly, it’s been working for them for a good century and that has culminated in Barack Obama as POTUS.

The following video from Rocking Mr E summarizes and highlights the damage Barack Obama, along with his loyal media cronies, have inflicted upon race relations in the past six and half years:

http://www.rockingphilosophy.com/2015/07/obamas-race-baiting-america.html

An Insightful Perspective On The Adam Goodes Booing Saga

Australian blogger Dallas Scott calls the bluff of those screaming “racist” in this never ending Adam Goodes episode:

The jeering was loud. Almost deafening in its unison – as hundreds of voices simultaneously uttered a long, slow “Boooooo” at the defiant man who stood before them from his position of power and privilege. The crowd refused to be silenced, their eyes fixed on him in an angry glare that reinforced the hatred coming from their mouths, the mocking tone of their cries reaching a crescendo that seemed to confuse their target, before his trusted advisor could intervene.

“They’re not saying ‘Boo’, they’re saying “Boo-urns”.

Just as Wayland Smithers protected Montgomery Burns in The Simpsons, sections of our media, together with the hierarchy of the unnecessary at the AFL, are now lying to protect Adam Goodes in much the same way. “They’re not booing you Adam, they’re just displaying their deep seated racism the only way they can”, or in Smithers-speak, “They’re not saying Boo, they’re saying “Boo-oong!”

Of course, we have the regular roster of apologists come out, shaming the country and our society for cutting down a sports star who happens to have Aboriginal blood as part of his racial make-up. The caring, informed and sensitive city dwellers who, despite their alabaster skin tone and lack of racial diversity, can not only see, smell and hear racism, but tragically, are so deeply affected by it that they feel they must differentiate themselves from the white person next to them by pointing at them and screaming racist long enough and loud enough that somehow, somewhere in the midst of all their righteous shouting, their own skin tone will be forgotten or ignored. 

One thing I’ve come to understand about our society is that often, those who see themselves as the most tolerant, educated and enlightened are usually most racist, close-minded of all. These types were the first to pick up their keyboard or a microphone and declare that speaking negatively about the so-called ‘war dance’ effort from Adam Goodes over the weekend means that we are culturally ignorant, yet in making such a claim, have themselves ignored an entire segment of the Aboriginal community, who are appalled at the ‘performance’. In wanting us to be a homogenous community capable of only thinking and feeling one way, therefore enabling them to have the correct information and be ‘right’, they are guilty of the same crime they are continually accusing an entire nation of – RACISM.  

The fact is, some Aboriginal people, myself included, saw that embarrassing display and did not feel pride. Instead, we felt shame, and a sense of sadness and loss. Some of this stems from seeing yet more of our traditions mocked and traded upon, invented and earning overnight acclaim, for little more than cheap thrills while the long standing traditions are ignored, left to die quietly and uncelebrated until they are forgotten and lost forever. Some of this comes from the fact we’re tired of the theatrics, and how his need for attention will play out for the rest of us, and creep a little into our own lives. For an urban blackfella like me, I hate the fact that all of a sudden my opinion is relevant. I haven’t written a blog post in almost a year, or bothered to watch free to air television in even longer, yet received two messages on my phone today – one from SBS and the other from 2GB, wanting to know what I think about the whole Goodes drama and depending on what I think, whether they want to hear from me. They aren’t the only ones. Friends, acquaintances and even the random guy standing next to me in line at the supermarket suddenly wants to hear what I have to say, but only on this one topic, just for now. The easiest way to get rid of them is to gauge their personal feelings, then just agree with them. If someone is genuinely looking for a discussion, they are easy to tell, but most people just want me to be the token black who validates their own feelings on the matter.

Views like mine, that are contrary to the representations being made by the rabid, name-calling media, are ignored or rejected by all those who simply want to brand every incident or comment with an ‘ism’, because the object of their outrage is never to stimulate an educated debate or a discussion, but rather they wish to simply stand on their given podium and recite their narcissistic lecture, a pointless exercise for them to reinforce their followers that they alone are a bastion of cultural relevance, understanding and compassion. Sadly, theses ‘enlightened’ folks also tend to take their cues on history from the most removed people of a culture, merely because they tend to occupy the cubicle or apartment next to them, or speak with the most authoritarian voice or sense of victimhood – a sure sign that they must know what they are on about, according to our current high standards of journalism in this country – instead of seeking the truth and looking for those with knowledge that comes from a life of lived tradition, rather than being well removed from it.

I used to dance as a kid. Most of the kids who grew up in our house did it, but I have no intention of my own children doing the same. My reluctance has nothing to do with them being of mixed heritage though, and everything to do with cultural appropriation. I said I used to ‘dance’ as a kid, because that is really all it was. I was dressed in a lap-lap and painted up, was taught the moves the rest of the kids were doing, but it was all just a show. The dances were not ones passed on to us from our Elders, performed for a specific reason or during a time of unique and special celebration that led me to understand my culture in a meaningful way, but rather a collection of dance moves put together by a choreographer who may or may not have had a distant Aboriginal ancestor she found out about in her mid-thirties. A few documentaries and books from the library later, she had all the cultural awareness she felt she needed, and as a bunch of children not yet trusted with much knowledge, we didn’t know any better. We danced for smiling crowds of educated, enlightened people who clapped politely while murmuring “Oh, how cultural”, as they watched us enraptured. I would smile back at them and dance harder, oblivious to what I was doing and simply happy to receive positive praise and attention from a crowd of people I didn’t even know. But I was no better than a performing monkey to them, and for all their education and compassion, those crowds were the most racist people of all. Their wisdom and understanding of Aboriginal people and culture was a passing fetish, and in an effort to appease them, I was walking all over my own culture for their amusement, all of us completely ignorant to this heartbreaking fact.

After becoming a man, I learned better. I learned that our chants, and our dances are sacred. They are powerful and special secrets, not entertainment for the masses or political statements designed to make sure you get yet another mention in the nightly news. I also took it to heart that the title of ‘Warrior’ is like respect. It is always earned, not merely given because of the colour of your skin or your heritage. I am proud to say that some of my own ancestors include great Warriors – men who fought and died to protect their families and their way of life, and faced enormous battles that I could never fully comprehend from where I sit today, in a relative position of privilege by comparison, however you look at the statistics and facts. It would make a mockery of the suffering and heroism of my ancestors to assign a title of great reverence and historical significance, such as ‘Warrior’, to a person whose fame and heroism is derived from little more than the ability to show up a few weekends a year and kick a leather ball around an overly groomed piece of paddock. 

As Adam walks out for his next game, before making his way onto that perfectly manicured stadium lawn, I suggest he take a deep, slow breath and reflect upon the reality of his life. Rather than having to emerge from the sheds for the ‘coloured people’, kept separate from the white folks playing beside him, he will run out after being supported by his entire team, not kept to the back. When he is thirsty, he doesn’t have to take a drink at the appropriately labelled drinking fountain, set aside for only folks with his racial identity, but rather will be served like a prince, with a special servant whose only job is to provide refreshments for the thirsty players, regardless of their skin colour or heritage. As he drives his brand new sports car to training, where he looks around at the other players arriving in their equally expensive vehicles and stops to realise he is paid just as much as them, if not more, he should perhaps pause a moment and wonder about whether he is fighting a war that has already been won, and instead of complaining from his position at the top, realise how those on the bottom rungs might be sick of hearing him whinging and would much rather he just got on with life. 

I didn’t mention Scott was of Aboriginal descent because skin colour only matters to shallow people with hidden social agendas, as Scott has identified and articulated above.
http://theblacksteamtrain.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/the-wayland-smithers-school-of.html