#AbortionSoBlack Because As Margaret Sanger Says: Blacks Are “Human Weeds”

So you’ve been tweeting #OscarsSoWhite to your hearts content and you love the great work Planned Parenthood have been illegally trading.

Whoa dude: paradoxical dilemma!

Perhaps it time you started tweeting #AbortionSoBlack because black babies seem to feature as heavily in abortion clinics as non-blacks do on Academy Award nomination lists.

Pro-abortion activists are again storming Washington D.C. as the Supreme Court hears arguments regarding a Texas law they consider too restrictive on abortion. It boggles my mind how desperately people will fight for the right to kill their own babies.

Most of the activists honestly think this is an argument about choice. They demand freedom in their reproductive lives. Hey, here’s a news flash. You already have it. But the choice is not to be made after the life is conceived, it is to be made before the reproductive act begins. But that is for another article.

To understand this crusade of death, simply look at the mother of the abortion movement, Margaret Sanger. Today’s liberal spin touts Sanger as a woman of strong convictions fighting for woman’s rights. She’s credited with educating the world on birth control and sex. I would like to continue that biography with actual facts, including her own words.

Sanger lived in Greenwich Village with her husband, William, where she rubbed elbows with New York elites like Socialist/Democrat Upton Sinclair and anarchist Emma Goldman. Sanger was a member of groups like the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party and the Liberal Club.

After finding herself in legal trouble, she fled to Europe where she had affairs with eugenics supporter Havelock Ellis and socialist H.G. Wells. While there, her progressive lovers and friends taught her how to use the compassion of family planning as a guise to persuade people to their cause. See, their objective wasn’t birth control to help the burdened family. It was to force their progressive ideology on society and wipe out those who were inferior, which was basically Blacks and other non-Whites, the physically and mentally inadequate, the physically and mentally handicap, and the poor.

Upon her return to the states, Sanger rolled up her sleeves and got right to work in pushing her doctrine of the perfect race. In a 1915 handbook targeting teenagers, she wrote, “Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence.” Does that sound like compassionate family planning or choice to you?  

In fact, she was so for a woman’s right to choose she wrote the following in “Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108):

-The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.

The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.

-Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense— defending the unborn against their own disabilities

In an article for American Weekly, Sanger provided the following insight in: “America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934. 

    Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

    Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

    Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

So who is the “unfit” in Article 1? According to Sanger, “Non-Aryan people [of the United States are] a great biological menace to the future of civilization.” Blacks she characterized as “human weeds”. In fact, this is so paramount to Sanger’s own brainchild, Planned Parenthood, that 79% of their abortion clinics target Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. If Planned Parenthood is about choice, why are they so focused on killing minorities?

In 2012, New York City aborted more Black babies than were actually born. In fact, abortions to Black mothers made up 42.4% of the babies killed while Hispanics comprised another 31%. Together 73% of New York City’s abortions were of these two minority groups alone. Congratulations Margaret Sanger and pro-choice advocates.

Articles 4 and 6 have nothing to do with choice. They are the antithesis of it. Proposing no woman has a “legal right to bear a child,” sounds more like enslavement than reproductive freedom. Demanding a “permit for parenthood” is anything but personal choice. It is a superiority dogma professed by progressive elitists who claim understanding and kindness to the very population they wish to terminate.

We all gasp at and repudiate the horrific actions of the Nazi’s against the Jews, but guess where they learned it from. Good old, Margaret Sanger and her eugenics friends right here in America. In fact, between 1907 and 1963, over 60,000 people were involuntarily sterilized in the United States under American law. Choice? I think not.

The movement of sterilization and segregation was not as popular as Sanger had hoped, especially after World War II. She had to find another way to rid the earth of the “unfit.” She had to convince the mothers to voluntarily terminate their own babies. Enter abortion.

Margaret SangerSanger was so invested in reducing, if not irradiating, the Black population, she found friends and allies in the KKK and other similar groups. She even enlisted Blacks themselves. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, an heir of Proctor and Gamble, Sanger wrote the following: 

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” 

So while you pro-choice people rally for your right to kill your offspring, know the woman who started it all did so because she thought you were stupid, unfit, diseased, inferior, and quite frankly, not good enough to reproduce. Sure, she did it under the guise of giving you the illusion of freedom in controlling how many children you have, but make no mistake, she did whatever she had to so you would proudly kill your own baby. It didn’t matter to her why you did it. She was only concerned about making sure you did do it.

There is nothing more diseased than a society that celebrates the execution of their own children. After seeing the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood selling aborted babies like a stolen car disassembled for parts, how can anyone still argue Planned Parenthood is a company worth supporting? It is morally equivalent to saying, “Nazis may have killed 6 million Jews, but they built the autobahn.” I, for one, think it is about time to abort, disassemble, and sell off Margaret Sanger’s most precious baby.  

But that’s just my 2 cents.



Investigators Who Exposed Planned Parenthood’s Illegal Baby Organ Trade Face 20 Years In Prison, Planned Parenthood Escapes Justice

Bill Muehlenberg exposes the hypocrisy of the New West:

When the rule of law and the criminal justice system is broken, and broken badly, then no country can last for long. That is exactly what we find occurring in the United States with the recent shock announcement that charges would be laid – not against the baby killing and baby parts selling Goliath but the David who caught them out. This is what has just happened:

The lead investigator behind the undercover Planned Parenthood videos faces up to 20 years in prison after a Houston grand jury decided on Monday not to charge Planned Parenthood with any wrongdoing – and instead indicted him for offering to purchase human organs from the abortion provider.

Center for Medical Progress lead investigator David Daleiden faces a second-degree felony charge of “tampering with a governmental record,” and a misdemeanor charge for violating the state’s “prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs.” That is, jurors in the state of Texas are accusing David Daleiden of trying to illegally traffic in aborted babies’ body parts.

I of course wrote plenty of articles on this when the explosive videos appeared last year, and highlighted the tremendous work of Daleiden and his team in showing the world the shocking truth about what Planned Parenthood really does for a living. My first article on this is found here: billmuehlenberg.com/2015/07/15/planned-parenthoods-deadly-baby-trade/

Daleiden 4For this amazing undercover work in exposing the diabolical activities of the world’s largest baby killing machine, Daleiden and Co deserve a medal and are worthy of the highest honours. Instead we find a corrupt and poisoned criminal justice system in the US which is actually making Daleiden the bad guy here. This is shocking beyond belief.

But any nation that can legally sanction and justify the murder of nearly one and a half million innocent babies a year has long ago ceased to be morally licit. So I guess we should not be surprised by this latest outrage and travesty of justice.

One commentator, Robert Gagnon, was quick to get off the mark in highlighting the utter madness of this decision:

Instead of indicting the very organization that was trafficking in human body parts the grand jury indicts the persons who were exposing such trafficking, on the alleged grounds that by posing as persons who wanted to sell fetal body parts they were violating the state’s “prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs.” Say what? So if the feds do an undercover sting operation with the Mafia they can be indicted under RICO racketeering law?

Exactly. It would be as if an international court found that the Nuremberg trials were illegal, letting off the hook the Nazis being tried there. It is that insane and that perverse. Those making massive profits from killing babies and selling their body parts go scot free while those who seek to expose and uncover this dastardly work are the ones being prosecuted!

And surprise, surprise: we now know that a Planned Parenthood board member actually works in the DA’s office which indicted Daleiden. As Jay Sekulow, head of the American Center for Law and Justice states:

What happened in Texas is very troubling. By giving Planned Parenthood a pass and indicting two pro-life journalists who merely revealed this horrific practice through their undercover work, the action of this local grand jury raises serious questions about the appropriate use of our legal system.

When you consider the fact that one of the prosecutors in the Harris County district attorney’s office is deeply involved with Planned Parenthood – serving as a board member for the local Planned Parenthood affiliate in Texas where the undercover investigation took place – along with the fact that she has served as an active fundraiser for Planned Parenthood for years – you have to ask the question – was this probe tainted? Was there a conflict of interest that produced a biased result?

There certainly is a conflict of interest here. Moreover, how many other eyewitnesses will be deterred from testifying about horrific crimes in the future, fearing they too will end up in jail? As Cheryl Sullenger of Operation Rescue said: “This has the effect of chilling the First Amendment freedom of the press and could scare crime witnesses away from coming forward for fear that they might suffer similar retaliatory prosecution.”

And Tennessee Congressman Diane Black put it this way: “It is a sad day in America when those who harvest the body parts of aborted babies escape consequences for their actions, while the courageous truth-tellers who expose their misdeeds are handed down a politically motivated indictment instead. Just days after tens of thousands of pro-life Americans participated in the March for Life to urge legal protection for the unborn, this senseless decision is a grim reminder of the work yet to be done.”

As horrific as all this is, we must look at the bigger picture here. As mentioned, a nation that can kill its own unborn children is already morally dead, and any perversion of justice is possible in such a climate of deadened consciences and ethical blindness.

Matt Walsh highlights these truths in his latest commentary. He begins by offering two very relevant Bible passages here:

-Proverbs 17:15: Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent – the LORD detests them both.

-Isaiah 5:20: Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.

He continues:

The first thing you must understand, if you don’t already, is that we live in a nation devoid of justice and hostile to truth. We live in a nation that acquits the guilty, condemns the innocent, calls evil good and good evil. That is America in 2016, and it’s been this way for quite some time.

Once you come to terms with this fact, you will no longer be surprised by anything that happens, no matter how outrageous, depraved, preposterous, or wicked. You will not be surprised that a billion dollar corporation called Planned Parenthood mutilates and murders over 300,000 children a year for profit, and you will not be surprised that our government gives these genocidal killers over half a billion dollars a year of free money, and you will not be surprised when an undercover investigation reveals Planned Parenthood officials selling the corpses of their victims, and you will not be surprised when the justice system clears the corpse-sellers of all wrong doing but indicts the undercover investigators for investigating them.

He highlights the double standards going on here:

If it’s illegal for investigative journalists to assume false identities, why isn’t Chris Hansen in prison? Hansen and his team pretended to be little girls in order to catch older men attempting to molest children. I suppose if the Harris County DA had a crack at them, all of the pedophiles would be cleared of wrongdoing, but Chris Hansen would be charged with fraud, harassment, and solicitation.

He concludes:

A few months ago, raw footage taped during an abortionist convention was leaked online. Many explosive conversations were captured, but perhaps none as devastating as the abortionist who stated very explicitly that abortion is “violence, it’s a person, it’s killing.”

She wasn’t caught in a crime. Even better: she was caught in a truth. In fact, that one statement, uttered by an abortionist who thought she was speaking only to a sympathetic audience, singlehandedly debunked and destroyed the primary pro-abortion argument. Many of the people who defended Planned Parenthood over the fetal trafficking allegations did so by insisting the babies aren’t people anyway. Well, guess what? The abortionists who kill the children disagree with you.

To me, that should be the headline.

But either way, Daleiden did prove for certain that Planned Parenthood sells baby parts, and that should be enough to take the entire organization down. What Daleiden didn’t account for, however, is that our government is corrupt to its core and many of our citizens are self-absorbed cowards. He didn’t account for the fact that justice is dead in America. In fact, it died long ago. It died the moment they legalized the mass murder of babies.

Yes, a nation that kills its own children is a nation that has killed its own conscience. And it has also killed the very notion of things like justice, decency and fairness. That is why we find this shocking case against Daleiden. In the Brave New World of baby killers and state sponsored murder, the only bad guys are those who dare to speak the truth.

As Orwell once put it, “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”

Please pray for Daleiden and his team. This is indeed a David vs Goliath battle, and it is ultimately a spiritual battle. At the very least, please sign and share this petition: http://www.lifesitenews.com/petitions/i-stand-with-david-daleiden/924785





There Are No “Christian” Terrorists

The mainstream media plays the double-fold game of looking around cluelessly when the almost-daily now (in the West that is, they average four per day worldwide) Islamic terrorist attack happens and fiercely pointing fingers and accusing the once every few years terrorists who don’t happen to be Muslims of being “Christians” or in the very least, “far-right wing”.

It’s funny. Childish and ironically funny.

Childish doesn’t need explaining but apparently ironic does, so allow me to.

There has never been a terrorist who acted in obedience to Christ.

In fact, the only way a “Christian” (which means “little Christ” and specifcially refers to someone who hears and obeys the words of Jesus) can become a terrorist is if they explicitly stop following Jesus.

Frankly, they would have to stop following Jesus for a little while before they would work their way up to murdering innocent people.

A quick lustful glance at that massive billboard of girl wearing almost nothing? Sure, what Christian man doesn’t have to resist that lustful double-take!

A casual and dismissive “it’s no problem” lie when in fact it is really inconvenient? Ceratinly, we’re fighting both our cultural conditioning and our flesh on that one!

Taking machine guns and pipe bombs to the end of year work party to gun down your co-workers? Not something I’ve personally struggled with…and when we follow Jesus, it’s pretty hard to find yourself even desiring to kill people let alone purchasing the chemicals and bullets to make it happen!

Don’t get me wrong – I follow Jesus and I am tempted to do many of the things I used to have no problem doing as an atheist (yep, lying, fornication, masturbation, stealing, violence, abusing, cursing, drugs, drunkeness – I loved, embraced, and justified it all once!). These days, I usually make better decisions to keep me away from activities that plant the seeds of these desires and, of course, the grace of God is active in my life, conforming to the image of the son of God, Jesus Messiah.

I am not saying Christians can’t be tempted to act according to the desires of the flesh (ie contrary to what Jesus commands) because I am and I have given in far more than I ought to.

But I know that if I start desiring revenge on someone (and I have), I have stopped pursuing Jesus and I need to get myself right with him.

That’s why I know that if someone is at the point of punching bullets through bodies, it means that following Jesus ended a long time ago. It would be fair to say that if a terrorist ever really was a Christian previously, they have long abandoned true faith in God by time they start murdering people.

The bible is full of both warnings against and examples of people wandering away from genuine faith in God. 

Doing what you want to do or feel like doing is actually one of the core tenants of anti-Christian faiths like Naturalism and Wicca, both atheistic religious creeds that exult and serve the self.

Christianity, contrarily, is all about denying the self and serving Christ.

Jesus is very clear about this when he makes this unmistakable statement:

“And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.” Matthew‬ ‭10:38-39‬ ‭ESV‬‬

This command is all about self-denial, about not getting what you want, but rather about choosing to obey God even when it means you don’t get what you want.

And Jesus does not order his followers to murder people, plain and simple.

So, there are no “Christian” terrorists. 

Here’s another good rundown of the logic:

Christian Terrorists Don’t Exist but Islamic Terrorists Do

“I’m sick of these white male NRA Republicans and their mass shootings beca … um, Sayed Farook? Hey, let’s not vilify an entire group.” — Jon Gabriel, editor-in-chief, Ricochet.com

Workplace violence strikes again. “Allahu Akbar!” evidently means, “I quit,” and pipe bombs are the new resignation letter. Southern Baptist redneck Syed Rizwan Farook and his Irish Catholic wife, Tashfeen Malik, are reported to have been inexplicably in touch with ambiguously international, not-at-all-Islam-related terrorists under investigation by the FBI prior to mowing down 35 white-privileged American citizens at a Christmas party in San Bernardino, California.

Investigators feverishly search for a motive.

Multiculturalism was unavailable for comment.

It’s said that not all Muslims are terrorists, but that most terrorists are Muslims. Bleeding heart “religion of peace” Jihad-deniers may explain away the global scourge of Islamic terrorism as “workplace violence,” the “result of climate change” or a “gun control issue” (California has the strictest gun laws in all 50 states, and Paris France has banned guns altogether), but the facts, common sense and our own observations reveal the truth. It’s world-class stupid to insist that, when demon-possessed Muslim terrorists mow down a room full of law-abiding citizens, the “progressive” panacea is to disarm the law-abiding citizens. “Enough is enough,” all right. Sit down, liberals. The adults are talking. We don’t need more gun control, we need more Islam control.

Brigitte Gabriel is a world-renown national security expert. Her concentration is on the – ahem – explosive rise in Islamic terrorism. She notes that there are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world. Of them, intelligence agencies estimate that 15-25 percent are orthodox Muslims, meaning they actually follow the teachings of the Quran.

“That leaves 75 percent of [Muslims being] peaceful people,” observes Gabriel. “But when you look at 15-25 percent of the world’s Muslim population, you’re looking at 180 million to 300 million people dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization. That is as big as the United States,” she concludes.

Indeed, with these harrowing numbers in mind it’s no surprise that there have been nearly 27,500 terrorist attacks worldwide committed by faithful Muslims since 9/11.

There have been zero committed by faithful Christians.

Here’s why.

Muslims, true Muslims, follow the teachings of their dead “prophet” Muhammad, a warring tyrant who, as even the Islamic Quran concedes, was a murderous misogynist and pedophile. Christians, true Christians, follow the very-much-alive Lord Jesus Christ, the God-man, whose teachings are found in the God-breathed Holy Bible.

Read related article: “‘Christian Atheist’ Denounces ‘Christian Terrorists.

Muhammad taught, and the Quran stresses, that a central tenet of Islam is to convert, enslave or kill the infidel. An infidel is anyone who is not Muslim or, depending on who’s doing the killing, belongs to a different sect of Islam. Those who fall into that elusive, perpetually mute category tagged “moderate Muslim” are also infidels or “idolaters.” They’re bad Muslims, and, so, according to the Quran, not Muslims at all. “When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them,” commands Surah 9:5. “Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” Faithful Muslims, true followers of Muhammad, “slay the idolaters wherever [they] find them” (see ISIS, Hamas, Syed Farook, et al.).

It’s what Muslims do.

On the other hand, Jesus taught His followers, who are called Christians, to “do to others what you would have them do to you” (Luke 6:31); that, “You shall not murder” (Matthew 19:18); and that we are to “love [our] enemies and pray for those who persecute [us]” (Matthew 5:44). It goes without saying that those who do not follow these teachings are not following Christ.

Indeed, while many may claim to be “Christian,” the word only applies to those who are justified in Christ, spiritually reborn and regenerated through the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit. The true Christian walks in Christ’s steps through faith and obedience.

Terrorism is in direct disobedience to Christ.

It’s in direct obedience to Muhammad.

Whereas “Muslim extremists,” that is, faithful Muslims, kill people extremely, “Christian extremists,” that is, faithful Christians, love people, including their enemies, extremely.

Islam is Christianity’s photo-negative. While Christianity brings eternal life to those choosing to surrender to Jesus, who alone is “the Way, the Truth and the Life,” Islam brings eternal death to those who surrender to Allah, who is “the best of deceivers” (“[A]nd Allah was deceptive, for Allah is the best of deceivers.” [see Surah 3:54]).

Which brings us to last week’s mass shooting near an abortion slaughterhouse in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Even as the secular left was gleefully screaming, “Christian terrorism!” Garrett Swasey, a pro-life, Christian pastor and police officer, was laying down his life for those inside the very Planned Parenthood he abhorred.

It’s what Christians do.

(For the record, this marks the first time in history that any liberal has been concerned for human life at a Planned Parenthood.)

Still, again, and so our liberal, anti-Christian friends fully understand, Officer Garrett Swasey was a pro-life Christian. Robert Dear, the evil, reclusive, deranged pothead who killed him, is not. Dear murdered three innocent people. He is, by definition, not “pro-life.” Neither is he Christian. He is, much like Planned Parenthood, “pro-death.”

Peas in a pod.

To be sure, pro-life Christians like Officer Swasey agree: Murdering babies is wrong. And murdering the murderers who murder babies is also wrong. Shooting innocent people is evil. Just like dismembering baby girls alive and selling their body parts is evil.

No, Robert Dear is no “Christian terrorist.” He may be a terrorist, but he’s not a Christian terrorist. He can’t be. He doesn’t follow Christ. If anything, Robert Dear’s actions are more like those of Planned Parenthood, orthodox Islam, and Syed Farook.

Bloody bosom buddies.

Yes, there have been terrorists who call themselves Christian.

But there has never been a Christian terrorist.


Obama Tries Hand At Irony, Succeeds (UPDATED: With More Organ Harvesting Hypocrisy)

This one speaks for itself:

President Barack Obama told a group of young African leaders on Monday that harvesting organs from humans that are killed as part of an African ritual was “craziness” and a “cruel” tradition that needed to stop. He warned of dehumanizing marginal groups of humans and of the problems that arise when “you are not able to see someone else as a human being.”

In a wide-ranging question and answer session with members of the Young African Leaders Initiative [YALI], a woman from Kenya said “Persons with albinism in Africa are being killed and their body parts harvested for ritual purposes,” a woman in the audience said. “My request to you is to raise this issue with heads of state of African countries to bring these atrocities to an end.”

Obama decried the practice and went on to encourage the young people to do everything in their power to fight on the behalf of vulnerable humans.

“Young people, you can lead the way and set a good example. But it requires some courage because the old thinking, people will push back at you and if you don’t have convictions and courage to be able stand up for what you think is right, than cruelty will perpetuate itself,” he said. He added, “If there’s one thing I want YALI leaders to come out with, it’s the notion of you are strong by taking care of the people who are vulnerable, by looking after the minority, looking after the disabled, looking after the vulnerable. You’re not strong by putting people down you’re strong by lifting them up. That’s the measure of a leader.”

Obama also tied the practice of harvesting organs from albinos with racism and discrimination against gay people and urged consistency in how they view the sanctity of human life if they want to complain about human rights abuses.

Obama’s comments come in the midst of a weeks-long scandal in his own country over the killing of unborn children via abortion followed by the harvesting and distribution of their organs. The Center for Medical Progress has released five videos of Planned Parenthood officials discussing the killing of human fetuses and the harvesting of their organs — or entire cadavers — to researchers willing to pay a pretty penny for them.

On the topic of human organ harvesting, President Obama’s spokesman Josh Earnest has said that President Obama has chosen not to watch the video footage of Planned Parenthood officials dissecting human fetuses for parts. Nevertheless, President Obama has vehemently defended the abortion group.

In 2012, Planned Parenthood said, while announcing a $1.4 million ad buy on his behalf, that they had “no greater champion” than President Obama.

During his time in the Illinois Senate, Obama’s devotion to abortion was so extreme that he argued a form of infanticide should remain legal out of fear that protecting infants born alive might somehow protect young humans in the womb.

To see the video referred to in the article, visit the link.

Thankfully, others have noticed the mind boggling double standards and gross hypocrisy on display from Obama here.

So here is one more perspective on the debacle:

Wow. Our President (and his team) really are clueless, aren’t they?

On Monday President Obama was speaking to a group of young African leaders who were attending the Young African Leaders Initiative in Washington, D.C. During his time with them someone asked about the killing of Albinos which has plagued Africa – Albinos are murdered and then have their body parts harvested to be sold for religious rites and in potions.

The questioner said it like this, “Persons with Albinism in Africa are being killed and their body parts harvested for ritual purposes. My request to you is to raise this issue with heads of state of African countries to bring these atrocities to an end.”

President Obama responded by condemning the barbaric activity.

“When I was in Africa, I said, there are important traditions and folkways that need to be respected that’s part of who each culture is — each country is — but there’s also foolish traditions and old ways of doing business.

The notion that any African would discriminate against somebody because of the color of their skin, after what black people around the world have gone through – is crazy.

It is infuriating and I have no patience for it.”

President Obama harshly condemned the grotesque and evil practice (as he should have), but obviously failed to grasp the greater truth. He has endorsed equally barbarous and much more expansive behavior here in the United States and around the world with his support of abortion. Moreover, he has thrown his full support behind exactly this practice of murdering and then selling body parts in his continued embrace of the practices undertaken by Planned Parenthood! In his response, Obama literally chastises himself for his “foolish” and “crazy” discriminatory beliefs that have led to the murders of more than 55 Million babies in America alone.

I won’t be holding my breath expecting him to see the irony in his response or the hypocrisy of his support of abortion.



America’s Use Of Atomic Bombs Is Evil But Ongoing Murder Of Millions of Children Through Abortion Is Righteous Freedom

We would have to be astounded at the logic of the left if it weren’t for the reality of sin and rebellion against God. It’s not about logic at all because it is all about defiance.

The ongoing re-education of society through school and the media has been pushing for the vilification of war for decades, especially the actions of the U.S. In using two atomic bombs on Japan in World War Two.

As the 70th anniversary of the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has recently passed, the mainstream media are reminding us again and again how the U.S. was really only making a statement to the USSR and that the dripping of the bombs actually had no impact upon the Japanese regarding surrender, seeing the nuclear annihilation of two cities as no different to normal bombing runs.

Consider the way the ABC presents the history:

The world changed forever when a US bomber dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima 70 years ago.

The Americans said they took the drastic step to put an early end to World War II and save the lives of hundreds of thousands of US soldiers, but this official narrative is now being overturned.

On an interesting side note, the ABC are seemingly engaged in an endless “overturning” of official narratives, whether in promoting homosexuality as healthy and normal, its attacks on natural and historical marriage, its blurring of biological sex that defines men and women in philosophical theories about fluid gender identity, or in its refusal to mention more than a passing word about the catastrophic but unsurprising revelations about Planned Parenthood’s baby organ trafficking.

Back to their report though:

On August 6, 1945 the world’s first atomic bomb exploded over Hiroshima, wiping out the city centre and killing about 140,000 people by the years’ end.

Keiko Ogura was eight-years-old at the time and only 2.4 kilometres from the hypocentre.

She remembers being engulfed in flames.

“A flash of light and the blast slammed me to the ground and I lost consciousness,” she said.

“I woke up, it was dark and everyone was crying.”

Bomb survivor’s message of peace

Tomiko Matsumoto was 14 when an atomic bomb fell on Hiroshima. Seventy years later, she tells her story.

Keiko said the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and another at Nagasaki three days later, which killed 70,000 more, were war crimes.

Many historians say the bombings did not lead to the Japanese surrender, and the Soviet declaration of war on Japan two days later was a bigger shock.

It put an end to any hope the Soviets would negotiate a favourable surrender for Japan.

The severely-weakened Japanese Imperial army had no capacity to fight the Soviets on a second front in China and Northern Japan.

Japanese historian Yuki Tanaka said the country had no choice because the Soviets would have killed Emperor Hirohito, seen as the heart and soul of imperial Japan.

“The Soviet Union would demolish the emperor system and they would execute the emperor as well as all members of the royal family,” he said.

New bomb not responsible for Japan’s surrender

America believed the shock and awe of the devastating power of the new bombs would force Japan into surrender, but experts say inside Japan it was viewed differently.

The Americans had already destroyed 66 Japanese cities with a massive fire bombing campaign.

In just one night, 100,000 civilians were killed in Tokyo.

Tokyo’s Temple University director of Asian Studies Jeffery Kingston said the new bombs would not have had the impact the Americans would have hoped.

“If you look at it from the perspective of the Japanese military, it doesn’t really make a big difference whether people are dying from fire bombing or atomic bombs … it is [just] two additional city centres that are destroyed,” he said.

The atomic bombings probably did play a part in averting a bloody ground invasion and saving thousands of US lives, but historians like Dr Kinston said the bombs were also about sending a message to the Soviets.

“We have this incredible new weapon, we have a monopoly on it and we are going to emerge as the strongest superpower. In a sense, this was the opening salvo of the Cold War,” he said.

Survivor’s call for future free of nuclear weapons
On the eve of 70th anniversary, the children of Hiroshima sing for a future free of nuclear weapons, but today more countries than ever have the bomb.

America’s atomic attacks on Japan started a nuclear arms race which bought the world to the brink of destruction.

Hiroshima survivor Keiko Ogura wants people to come and see for themselves.

“Some people in the world still do not understand the cruelty of nuclear weapons, and that they are absolute evil. This surprises me. I want them to come to Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” she said.
Most historians agree the official version from the US government — that the bombs were dropped to force an early surrender and saved up to a million American lives from a bloody invasion — is far too simplistic.

Mr Tanaka said it was a criminal act under international law.

“Also, morally it was wrong. So they have to find some non-legal arguments to self-justify the conduct, that they annihilated 210,000 civilians,” he said.

The debate in academic circles now is how much other factors came into play in America becoming the first and still the only nation to drop the atomic bomb in warfare.

The contradictions and denial going on here is impressive, even for a media organisation that specialises in this kind of thing.

On the one hand they would have us believe that the atomic bombs achieved nothing different to normal firebombing:

In just one night, 100,000 civilians were killed in Tokyo.

If you look at it from the perspective of the Japanese military, it doesn’t really make a big difference whether people are dying from fire bombing or atomic bombs.

But then why is the atomic bomb so evil and not firebombing and bombing in general because they make a clear distinction:

Mr Tanaka said it was a criminal act under international law.

“Also, morally it was wrong. So they have to find some non-legal arguments to self-justify the conduct, that they annihilated 210,000 civilians,” he said.

Either the atomic bombs are different from other weapons, which would suggest that the Japanese did respond to the use of the bombs in spite of this report’s claim, or they are no different to other weapons and therefore cannot be considered uniquely cruel or evil as the report would have us believe.

So they want us to see atomic weapons as evil to push their nuclear proliferation goals but they also want to insist that atomic bombs had no part in ending the war because their impact is no greater than conventional warfare.

Which is it?

The more important questions remain unanswered:

  • Is war necessary and what if it is not avoidable?
  • Did the Japanese do horrendous evil, more so that other nations during war?
  • Who gets to define morality?

The answers are that sometimes, war is the only option. The Japanese were not going to just lay down and there is good evidence that a single bomb capable of destroying an entire city was reason enough to cease fighting, unless you agree with the revisionism above that nukes didn’t faze the Japanese at all.

By their own miserable worldview, the left make morality a subjective choice so it comes as no surprise that they fixate on the hundreds of thousands killed in Japan by the U.S. During a war but refuse to mention the 57 million babies murdered by abortion there during peacetime.

The double standards are excruciating!

The left love to push their anti-war stance because they refuse to see the necessity of war against empires that are quenched by no other means. They sincerely believe that enough education (see: re-education) will lead all people into the harmonious unity in the leftist ideology.

That why the West is in such a predicament with Islam, which believes that its religious ideology is superior to every other and will die violently to establish it across the world.

It’s also why the West was in such a predicament with the Japanese empire, which was motivated by a similar Shinto zeal manifest in emperor worship that led to suicide bombing and all manner of cruelty against friend and enemy alike.

The very same delusional thinking is why the left have fought so hard against the death penalty in favour of rehabilitation for heinous criminals, no matter the extent of their crimes.

And it’s their own worship of the self-absorbed individual that ensures abortion is mentioned rarely and only ever in a positive light.

Sometimes, the hard way of war is the only way a people will learn and while war is an evil, it is a necessary one.

That goes for both Islam and the left because this war is inevitable.

One Dead Lion vs One Billion Murdered Children

Western mainstream media has become the equivalent of the Nazi and Communist propaganda machines, concealing truth and maligning their enemies as they indoctrinate generations into their own demonic ideology.

That’s why we are hearing a lot about some dentist who shot a lion and never about the billion plus children murdered using the cruel and inhuman abortive method.

How do you even reason with people who believe that murdering billions of human beings is the success of women’s rights? 

Bill Muelenberg’s recent article shows us just how far our culture has sunk and yes, the complicit murder of children at the rate the West does is far worse than anything we have done before, be it slavery or any other thing that we are legitimately guilty of:

Simply opening the day’s newspapers, or tuning into the electronic news media outlets, can often reveal rather jarring juxtapositions. Today some of the talking points are lions, the ongoing expose of Planned Parenthood, and various reactions to both.

The big one is the story about the lion shot illegally in Africa. Everyone seems to be talking about this one. For those not aware of the story, it goes like this:

Cecil the lion – the most famous creature in one of Zimbabwe’s national parks – was killed by an American hunter who has boasted about shooting a menagerie of animals with his bow and arrow, The Telegraph can reveal.

Walter James Palmer, a dentist from Minnesota, is believed to have paid £35,000 to shoot and kill the much-loved lion with a bow and arrow. The animal was shot on July 1 in Hwange National Park. Two independent sources have confirmed the hunter’s identity to the paper, which has also seen a copy of the relevant hunting permit.

And the most recent media reports about this now mention that he has made a public apology for his actions:

Walter Palmer, the US dentist and big game hunter who killed Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe, has written a letter to his patients apologising for the disruption to their treatment while the international furore continues….

In the letter, addressed to his “valued patients”, Palmer once again stated that he thought the hunt was legal and that the proper hunting permits had been obtained.

Plenty of people are very concerned about all this. And I certainly am not begrudging the fact that they feel outraged, but I am questioning why it is that once again an animal death generates so much concern and public attention, while the slaughter of innocent babies does not even raise an eyebrow.

As my good friend Kathleen Linger has put it, “People are upset because the lion was supposed to be protected in a safe haven, but what about the unborn babies who are also supposed to be protected in the safe haven of their mothers’ wombs? Just as this lion was lured out of its safe haven, so the abortionists rip the babies out of their safe havens.”

Moreover, folks like Ernest Hemingway and Theodore Roosevelt were famous for hunting lions and other big game in Africa and adorning the walls or floors of their homes with their trophies. And of course how many millions of carnivores depend upon others to do the killing for them every day of the year?

Already zillions of hours of media time have been devoted to this story, yet the mainstream media is barely even talking about something far worse: the gruesome killing of babies and the harvesting and selling of their body parts. Why no media coverage about this? Why no international outrage about this?

While a few brave and responsible media outlets like Fox News have covered the PP story, most are not. This story is surely of far greater moral weight, and cuts deep into the very basic values of any civilised society. Yet it is mostly met with silence.

That tells me a lot about the moral meltdown that is so characteristic of the West. Any society that can remain silent about the wholesale destruction of millions of babies, and not even bat an eyelash over a menu of body parts for sale is a society that no longer can claim to be part of the civilised world.

Another news item which is utterly shocking concerns a recent judicial decision. A judged has weighed into the PP mess and said it has to stop. The killing of babies and selling of parts? Um no, the video exposes of this. Yes you heard me right. As one report states:

The California Superior Court has issued a narrow temporary restraining order preventing the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), a pro-life group, from releasing further undercover video footage taken of three top-level staff of StemExpress.

CMP is the organization behind the series of three videos released over the past three weeks exposing the alleged harvesting and sale of body parts from aborted babies by Planned Parenthood – body parts that are then purchased by StemExpress.

CMP has alleged that the fees paid by StemExpress to Planned Parenthood violate federal law prohibiting the sale and trafficking of human tissue.

While Planned Parenthood has claimed that the fees paid to them by StemExpress merely cover their costs, and fall within the bounds of the law, the video footage released so far has appeared to show Planned Parenthood employees seeking profit as part of the transaction.

In the most recent video, released Tuesday, a Planned Parenthood affiliate vice president was caught on video describing how the abortion organization can maximize profit. “I think a per-item thing works a little better, just because we can see how much we can get out of it,” Dr. Savita Sinde said of the aborted baby.

The Associated Press, which broke the news about the court order, reports that the undercover videos of the Stem Express staff were filmed at a restaurant in May.

It is unclear just how significant an impact the court order will have on the release of subsequent videos in the series. David Daleiden, the lead researcher with CMP, has said that at least nine more videos are slated for release.

The restraining order reportedly only pertains to the footage of the Stem Express employees, meaning that any other footage, including that featuring Planned Parenthood employees, can still be released as planned.

In an exclusive comment to LifeSiteNews after the release of the court order, Daleiden said that, at the end of the day, what happened in the courtroom may actually be a victory for the pro-life group.

“The ruling is very narrow, concerning only one specific meeting, and it is temporary and contingent pending further litigation,” he said. “The judge actually threw out completely the part of StemExpress’ case where they were asking to suppress the documents on their baby parts sales.”

“It was a much better day for us than it was for them and Planned Parenthood.”

As Kathleen also pointed out, why does this sound familiar? Surely courts in Germany in the 30s and 40s would also have blocked any attempts by concerned citizens to expose the nasty secrets of the Nazi killing machine. Hitler and his colleagues literally got away with murder in part by covering up what they were doing and silencing the critics.

So on it goes. We have fighting in the courts as to which is worse: the evil trade of PP, or the exposure of their dastardly deeds by concerned organisations. Incredible. But most of the media is utterly fixated on some poor lion. Again, don’t get me wrong: I am no fan of any unnecessary animal cruelty or killing.

But some folks are calling for the dentist to be hanged! Really. Sorry, but when these same folks start calling for the money-making mass murderers at PP to be suitably dealt with, then I might start to take them more seriously. Otherwise their selective moral outrage does not impress me one lousy bit.




Thankfully, the end of abortion need not come with human reason, which is frankly the reason it occurs in the first place. Human wisdom apart from God did, after all, get us into sin and a cursed creation but God’s plan is already well on its way to completion in Christ Jesus.

The Death Knell Of Planned Parenthood? Sure Hope So!

Planned Parenthood was always a disgusting and despicable organisation.

Now, a few more people know about it. Naturally, the pro-murder mainstream media are squirming as they try to avoid covering this horrific news and it’s nice to know, especially since they devote most of their resources to cultural subversion and general lies.

Apparently the story is just gaining momentum though and Bill Muehlenberg’s recent article The Ongoing Implosion of Planned Parenthood makes some powerful commentary on this matter:

Call it what you will, Planned Barrenhood or Banned Parenthood, the last few weeks have been a bit rough for the world’s largest baby killing organisation. Indeed, this is a story that keeps on giving. The group that videoed the diabolical dealings of PP, the Center for Medical Progress, have now released a second – and equally damning – video.
It keeps getting worse and worse. The new video shows a senior PP official haggling over the prices of fetal body parts. Toward the end of the 8-minute video, she even jokes about how she “wants a Lamborghini.” Well, those baby body parts do add up I guess. See it all here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjCs_gvImyw

There is no question that PP is right up there with the Nazis. This is a group that has a long history of demonic activities. Just recently they have been caught out on a number of gruesome deeds:

-covering up sexual abuse of minors

-aiding and abetting sex traffickers

-double-billing taxpayers

-and of course the cold-hearted murder of millions of innocent babies

Well, given that PP was founded by the arch-eugenicist Margaret Sanger, what do we expect? You remember her, with such memorable quotes as:

“The handicapped, including the blind, deaf, dumb, mute and epileptics, are the dead weight of human waste.”

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.”

“The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order,”

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Nice, real nice. Her callous, heartless and diabolical views were the very basis of PP, and they continue in the same exact mindset today. So why are we surprised at these new revelations? This is simply PP at work. This is what it does for a living. This is its very purpose and function.

But all these new revelations are catching them out big time. If what they deal with (around 350,000 a year in the US alone) are merely clumps of cells one minute, how can they be human body parts (brains, livers, arms, legs, etc) the next minute? When it comes to making money, the misuse and abuse of the English language will do nicely thanks.

Yet in the US they also receive over a half billion dollars a year in taxpayer funding. And on top of that there is plenty of corporate sponsorship as well for these killers. In the US there are 41 corporations and organisations that directly contribute to PP.

This is not only a very well-oiled and efficient killing machine, it is a very lucrative one as well. Indeed, the average salary for a PP regional CEO is just a tad short of $200,000 per year. Killing babies is obviously a lot more profitable than teaching in a school or flipping burgers.

While PP is doing all the sorts of stuff that would make the Nazis proud (and they did learn a lot from Sanger and Co.), one of the more incredible things (but not unexpected) is how the mainstream media has been doing its best to ignore this story.

This is clearly one of the most important stories of the year, yet the lamestream media is doing all it can to avoid it. It is only because the alternative media has made so much of it that they have reluctantly been getting into the act. Mollie Hemingway has just done a piece documenting this despicable dereliction of duty. Compare the beat-up about the Confederate Flag to the PP story:

-The New York Times has run stories and essays on the Confederate flag 149 times since June 17 (and only 39 of those mention Roof), 41 of those in the first six days. That compares to three stories on Planned Parenthood during the same window, just 7 percent of what you’d expect if the New York Times considered those stories merely of equal importance.

-CNN has had 493 mentions of the Confederate flag since June 17 (only 188 of these even mention alleged church shooter Dylann Roof), and managed 167 in the first six days. In the first six days of the Planned Parenthood scandal, they managed 7 mentions, less than 5 percent what you’d expect if you considered those stories only of equal importance.

She mentions other major news outlets, then offers “a few stories that I might have reporters look into” if the MSM is having troubles trying to unearth a story. Here are just some of them:

-We’ve heard about serial murderer/abortionist Kermit Gosnell keeping trophies of his victims, abortion clinics dumping babies in the trash, and now Deborah Nucatola working to do “a little better than break even” in the sales of intact baby organs. What’s the standard procedure for disposal of the unborn children killed in abortion? Are there abortion clinic standards for this? Does it vary state by state? Do states even have regulations? Does Planned Parenthood have uniform regulations? If not, why not? If so, how are they enforced?

-How much money does Planned Parenthood receive via sales of baby organs? Do they keep records? Are those records trustworthy? How do we know? How significant are these funds to the abortion portion of Planned Parenthood’s operation? How does compensation for the children’s lungs, livers, hearts and brains vary by state, if they do vary?

-How far along in a pregnancy must a woman be for her child’s organs to be considered worthwhile for procurement, sale and transfer? How much does the value of a child’s liver, heart, lungs, etc., increase with time? Do the sales of baby organs form a significant enough part of Planned Parenthood’s business model to result in, say, filibustering of protections for late-term unborn children?

-What are the laws on trafficking in human body parts? Who wrote those laws? Was the abortion industry involved in writing those laws?

-How much money is made throughout the organ sale process? How do corporations make their way around laws prohibiting the express sale of human organs? What do ethicists say about these loopholes and workarounds?

-Could expert observers take us through Planned Parenthood’s various responses to the charges levied in the video? They don’t deny the charges. How is that significant?

Good questions indeed. If the MSM were really objective, unbiased, and neutral, they would be all over this story like a rash. But they are not. The overwhelming majority of those in the MSM are secular lefties who fully support abortion on demand. So of course they don’t want to cover this story.

They only want to go after Christians and conservatives. They sure don’t want to go after their own. That is why it is so absolutely essential that the alternative media exists. It is doing the job the MSM refuses to do. And I will also keep hammering away at stories like these.

Pro-life activist Lila Rose had this to say about the new video:

This latest video further illustrates the barbaric reality of business at Planned Parenthood – that after selling an abortion, Planned Parenthood works to improve their bottom line by harvesting the body parts of the child they have just killed. What has our nation come to that we allow the brutality of abortion upon our children, and then sell their broken bodies for profit, all the while, funding the perpetrator? While millions of Americans, on both sides of the political aisle, are expressing their horror at Planned Parenthood’s trafficking of preborn children’s bodies — their tiny lungs, hearts and livers — our taxpayer dollars continue to flow into the organization at the rate of over $500 million per year. Human rights are bipartisan — where is the outcry from presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and others over sale of the parts of children? Silence in the face of such atrocity is complicity.

Exactly. Just as there was damnable silence from far too many Germans when the Nazis were freely doing their thing, and the concentration camps were filling up, so too we have way too much silence today. And it is not just the MSM who are abdicating their responsibilities here.

Most churches and Christian leaders are not saying a word about any of this. They don’t want to rock the boat, upset their congregations, and lose out on the weekly offering. They have blood on their hands. Their unwillingness to stand up for “the least of these” as Jesus put it will not go unnoticed come judgment day.

At the very least, all government funding of PP should stop immediately. We already have several Congressional investigations and at least seven US state investigations going on over this horrific activity. I hope many more such investigations take place, and I hope all the gory details get out far and wide.

And I hope that as a result of all this, PP closes its deadly doors, for good. If we all celebrated the closing of the doors of the death camps in Germany 70 years ago, we should be looking forward to the same here.

Indeed, it’s amazing that this company continues to exist at all but we can be sure that like the Third Reich, it’s days are numbered and that’s a wonderful thing.

“The house of the wicked will be destroyed, but the tent of the upright will flourish.” ‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭14:11‬ ‭ESV‬‬

Further Reflections On The Planned Parenthood Freak Show

Abortion is murder.

As Christians, we can show mercy to mothers who have aborted their children but our culture is not a wounded mother – it is the product of a merciless ideology.

Murder by abortion has killed well over one billion human beings in the last century and the ideology must be attacked with truth.

A woman’s choice to murder her child is a bad choice, no two ways about it. 

There are a lot of commentaries worth reading about the latest sickening revelations about Planned Parenthood. Here are some of them:

Sanctity of Trees, or Sanctity of Human Life? By Ken Ham.

Now let me say right from the start—this item is not about environmental issues. This article is not about clear-cutting! AiG has a number of articles dealing with how humans should view the environment such as this one called “Is Stewardship the Same as Going Green?”
Today’s post is about the gross hypocrisy and inconsistency I see in the world today.

This week I read a news article titled, “Artist Draws Attention to Illegal Land Development.” The article stated, “Trees are one of the Earth’s most precious resources, providing us with everything from healthy soil and oxygen to building materials constructed out of a renewable resource, and yet there are those who don’t appreciate the sanctity of trees . . . . Artist Yeka Haski decided to paint the stumps to look like shanks of meat, so the crooked developers would realize ‘murder without blood and cries is still a murder.’” You can see the artwork on the trees at this link.

So that article is about the “sanctity of trees”!

Then I read an article titled, “Shock Video Catches Planned Parenthood’s Top Doctor Selling Body Parts of Aborted Babies.” The article states, “New undercover footage shows Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s Senior Director of Medical Services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, describing how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted unborn children and admitting she uses partial-birth abortions to supply intact body parts.”

And just a reminder that in 2013, President Obama thanked Planned Parenthood. He stated (and remember when he says “health care” and “woman’s right” in this context—he means abortion, the murdering of children),

“As long as we’ve got to fight to make sure women have access to quality, affordable health care, and as long as we’ve got to fight to protect a woman’s right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know that you’ve also got a president who’s going to be right there with you, fighting every step of the way,” said Obama. “Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you.”

Also remember that President Obama is a supporter of partial-birth abortion (really, partial-birth murder).

So what happened to the sanctity of human life?

I wonder if the same artist who calls cutting down trees “murder” and if the same author that used the term “sanctity of trees” are also being just as vocal about the legalized murdering of millions of children—in fact, 55 million of them in America since Roe v. Wade in 1973!

And another sad observation I make is this. There are those in the church who support gay “marriage,” but there have been a lot of leaders and others from the church who are being very vocal against gay “marriage.” However, has the church been just as vocal each year when millions of children are being murdered in their mother’s wombs?

Think about it! The abortion holocaust far surpasses the terrible atrocities of Hitler. Could it be that one of the reasons God is withdrawing the restraining influence of the Holy Spirit in this culture and turning people over to debased things (read Romans 1) is because this nation has brutally murdered around 55 million children?

So where is the outcry?

By and large I find that many people are more concerned about an insect, a tree, a frog, a bat, a clover, and so on, than they are about the sanctity of human life! The government enacts legislation to protect plants and all sorts of animals, but then legalizes the murdering of millions of children. What hypocrisy! How much more inconsistent could this culture become?

The “murder of trees?” What about the murder of millions of children? “Sanctity of trees?” What about the sanctity of human lives?

These six things the Lord hates, Yes, seven are an abomination to Him: A proud look, A lying tongue, Hands that shed innocent blood (Proverbs 6:16–17)

I encourage you all to read this article titled, “When Does Life Begin?”

The Rhetorical Tear Gas Of Planned Parenthood By Jared Oliphint

The weary fight against our culture’s quickening pace toward redefining humanity seems to be without end. Issues at the core of personhood—sexual identity, a right to life for the small and defenseless, an aspirational family structure—seem to be collapsing both outside and even inside the church. No longer are these mere abstract scenarios, theoretical moral puzzles to be solved as a mental exercise.

Though these ethical scenarios have now been concretely applied throughout our culture, they are still puzzles, and puzzles have rules—for both sides. And if we know what some of the rules are, we can blow the whistle on cheating when we see it. 

Think of the rhetoric that systemically spewed through the culture after the recent Supreme Court decision—“Love Wins.” Love. Implied in “love wins” is that the minority opinion was against love. But love is not the central element of the marriage issue; no one is bound to love their potential spouse as a legally necessary condition for marriage. By taking the issue out of its specific focus on the definition of marriage, and hoisting it up into the bare, general, vague, and legally irrelevant concept of “love,” the discussion and conversation becomes cloudy, murky, and confused. We were thrown rhetorical tear gas, where words were scattered randomly, without purpose, and dialogue has lost its anchor and orientation.

Whose Choice?

In the latest exposure of Planned Parenthood’s public baby-genocide, this rhetorical strategy—keeping terms and concepts generic, avoiding specifics—has been used for decades. Words like “choice,” “right,” and “health” (which each side affirms depending on how those terms are defined and qualified) are trotted out and exclusively claimed for marketing strategies toward the cause. For example, one person tweeted: “I #standwithPP because I’m not grossed out by science and I still support choice!” The most obvious questions prompted from his choice of words are, “Who is grossed out by science in general, or who has even made such a claim?” and “What kind of choice are you talking about? Whose choice about what?” The rhetoric leaves the species for the genus; “selling aborted baby parts” is swapped for “science.” And using more rhetorical sleight of hand, “killing a baby inside a woman’s womb” is swapped for that most generic of words—“choice.” 

Whose Freedom?

Moreover, Matthew Kohut tweeted: “The latest attack on Planned Parenthood strengthened my support for women’s freedom.” Freedom joins the list of other general, non-specific words frequently tossed around at the expense of substance. The issue is not whether women should have freedom, but to what sort of freedom we are referring and how that freedom would apply in the context of another’s competing freedom—in this case a young child’s. If these tiny victims had the ability to speak on behalf of themselves, I’m sure they would ask how these freedom advocates defend a mother’s non-specific freedom against their own specific freedom to exist and survive, to not be destroyed against their will.

Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards seldom veers from this tactical game plan. Among a string of substantially useless, vapid truisms, she says: “Spreading false information is an age-old strategy of people hell-bent on denying women care and shaming them for exercising their rights.” If there is any age-old strategy at work, it is Planned Parenthood’s plan to hide away the specifics of the abortion discussion, since the details are grotesque and evil. Keep the language as general and non-applicatory as possible. “Care for women.” “Exercising rights.” Each catchphrase begs for an answer: “Care” for whom? Whose “rights”? Which “woman”?

Ready to Illumine

Even the name Planned “Parenthood” is sinister in its deception. An organization that puts an end to a woman’s role as a mother, and to a man’s role as a father, is not in the business of planning parenthood, but in planning its irreversible end. When the name of an organization sacrifices accuracy for marketing purposes, there should come a time when the market turns against its deceiver for its bait-and-switch methods. 

Part of a Christian ethic involves representing God’s world accurately, as the way he has made it (Exod. 20:16). Deceptive and confusing rhetoric should have no place in secular discourse, but it should be especially absent among Christians. When marketing goals and party-building tactics seep their way into the church, Christ’s name suffers. So believers should be particularly careful that we don’t fight rhetorical fire with fire. And with that Christian conviction comes a responsibility to call out deceptive language when appropriate. When efforts are made to couch ethical issues in vague, foggy terms, Christians should be alert to this tactic, ready to expose the specifics of issues out of their dark corners and into the light of God’s truth.

Jesus Loves The Little Children By Kevin DeYoung

Oddly enough, it’s sometimes progressives who are most eager to move the culture backward.

As we reflect in horror at the utter callousness with which some persons and organizations speak of (not to mention crush) the tiniest humans, it’s worth remembering that the ancient world was unabashedly open to the killing of children. For starters, they had almost none of the sentimentality we have towards kids. There was no Disney, no summer camps, no play dates. Family life–even if there was such a thing–certainly did not revolve around children. In general, children, were useful at best, burdens at worst, and almost never coddled.

If there was one dominant fact regarding children in the ancient world it was their high mortality rates, especially among infants. Many newborns were stillborn or died in labor. Those who made it safely out of the womb often went hungry. There were too many mouths to feed and too little food. As a result, children were often abandoned, exposed to the elements, literally left on trash heaps to die. From 230 B.C. onward, the most common family in Greece was a one-child family. Families of four or five were rare. Some families might want two sons, but rarely would they want two daughters.

Unwanted children were disposed of, often sold into slavery. Others were aborted in the womb. Many more were simply killed as infants. Newborns were not considered part of the family until the father officially acknowledged them and received them into the house by religious ceremony. Consequently, ancient Greeks and Romans thought little of little babies and did not hesitate to get rid of them.

In the ancient world, it was uniquely the Jewish people who prohibited abortion and infanticide, the latter of which was not outlawed until Christianity took on a privileged place in the empire. Christians have always opposed killing children, whether infants outside the womb or infants inside the womb. The two were one and the same crime. “You shall not abort a child or commit infanticide,” commanded the Didache, a late first century church constitution of sorts. Despite the muddled arguments of progressive Christian groups and demoninations (whose obfuscation with language is positively Orwellian), opposition to abortion and infanticide is not simply one position for Christians, it is the Christian position.

Jesus welcomed children when others wanted to push them away (Mark 10:13-16). He said the measure of our love for him would be measured by our love for children (Mark 9:36-37). He took the children in his arms as if to say, “Honor these little ones, and you honor me. Send them away because they are weak, socially insignificant, and bothersome, and you’ve demonstrated you don’t understand the values of the kingdom.”

As abortion is again in the public eye (though willfully ignored by major media outlets), let’s pray for our society to change its mind regarding the smallest and most helpless of its citizens. Let’s pray for the church to lead the way in protecting, honoring, and caring for children–not matter how unborn or unwanted. Let’s pray that every judge, politician, and doctor becomes convinced of the sanctity of unborn life and acts accordingly. Let’s pray for the flourishing of pregnancy centers and women’s clinics that provide an alternative to abortion. Let’s pray for the women contemplating such a tragic choice, and for the family members encouraging them in the wrong direction. Let’s pray for men to be men, to stop fooling around and to stop fleeing when they have. Let’s pray that hundreds of politicians, thousands of pastors, millions of would-be moms and dads, and 300 million hearts are gripped by a Jesus-inspired view of children.

Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world. Even the ones with an umbilical cord.

“A Lot of People Want Intact Hearts These Days” — Planned Parenthood, Abortion, and the Conscience of a Nation By Albert Mohler

Yesterday’s release of a video showing the senior medical director of Planned Parenthood casually discussing the sale of organs from aborted babies is a moral challenge thrown right in the face of all Americans.
The video reveals Dr. Deborah Nucatola, senior director of medical services for Planned Parenthood, discussing the intentional harvesting of organs and other tissues from babies aborted in Planned Parenthood clinics. While reaching with her fork for salad, Dr. Nucatola openly tells a group she believes to be medical researchers that there is a great demand for fetal livers, but “a lot of people want intact hearts these days.”

Dr. Nucatola went on to explain in chilling detail that abortionists often plan in advance how to harvest desired organs, even telling the group that a “huddle” is sometimes held with clinic staff early in the day, so that targeted organs can be harvested from unborn babies.

Her language is beyond chilling as she described how abortions are conducted specifically to harvest intact organs: “We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part. I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.” She also described using an abortion technique that appears to be partial-birth abortion.

The undercover video was released by the Center for Medical Progress, a group with ties to previous efforts to expose Planned Parenthood and the reality of its murderous work. As expected, Planned Parenthood struck back, claiming that the video misrepresented Dr. Nucatola, Planned Parenthood, and the procurement of fetal organs.

In the video, Dr. Nucatola suggests that a cost of $30 to $100 would be a likely range of charges for organs and tissues harvested from aborted babies. She also tells the group that Planned Parenthood does not want to be seen as profiting from the sale of such organs, but she makes clear that this concern is not hampering the harvesting and transfer of the organs.

The sale of human tissues is illegal in the United States, as is the timing or arranging of an abortion if the cause of the abortion is the procurement of organs or tissue. Within hours of the release of the video, Republican presidential candidates and at least two governors were calling for investigations into the involvement of Planned Parenthood in the business of selling fetal organs.

Likewise, the defenders of Planned Parenthood attacked the video and the organization behind it. But Planned Parenthood is clearly concerned about the effect of the video, and it should be. The sight of the senior medical director of Planned Parenthood reaching for salad as she explicitly discusses tearing apart babies in the womb is impossible to reduce to words.

Planned Parenthood called the video “heavily edited, secretly recorded,” and said that it “portrays Planned Parenthood’s participation in tissue donation programs that support lifesaving scientific research.”

The Center for Medical Progress also released over two hours of what it said was unedited video of the conversation. As in the case of previous revelations of wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood, the group goes after the accuser more than the accusations.

But Planned Parenthood is having a hard time keeping its story straight. Eric Ferrero, vice president of communications for the national organization, acknowledged the transfer of fetal organs and tissues, but said that it was all legal and insisted that “there is no financial benefit for tissue donation for either the patient or for Planned Parenthood.” And yet, a public relations firm supporting Planned Parenthood, also put out a release stating that “the transcript indicates that Deborah Nucatola was speculating on the range of reimbursement that patients can receive after stating that they wish to donate any tissues after a procedure.” Well, which is it?

Planned Parenthood stands at the epicenter of the Culture of Death and receives almost half a billion dollars a year in government support. They are not going to be able to explain this video away.

I have no reason to believe that the video is anything less than totally credible. But, even if Planned Parenthood somehow finds a way to evade justice in terms of criminal activity, the part of the video that Planned Parenthood does not –and cannot — deny reveals their senior medical director enjoying a conversation over a meal in which she describes tearing apart the bodies of unborn human beings in order to get the desired organ: “I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.”

When the Allied forces liberated the concentration camps of the Nazi regime, General Dwight D. Eisenhower ordered the ordinary German citizens of nearby towns and villages to walk through the camps and to see what they had allowed and facilitated. Eisenhower’s point was all too clear — you allowed this to happen, and you share the guilt.

So it is with all Americans. Planned Parenthood and the abortion industrial complex are funded with our tax dollars. Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, was a racist openly committed to eugenics. Millions of unborn babies have died in its facilities. The group thrives because Americans allow it to thrive.

When this video went viral yesterday, I waited to see how the mainstream media and abortion supporters would respond. That response has, for the most part, been exactly what I expected — defend Planned Parenthood at any cost.

But the video is out there, and it will stay out there. There is no way to un-see it once it is seen.

Writing at Cosmopolitan magazine, abortion supporter Robin Marty said that she had seen the video. Then she said, “Now, frankly, I’m just going to yawn.”

Maybe she will, but if so that will require a massive act of denial. Later in her own essay she stated: “I shuddered when listening to the discussion of how the fetus can be removed, and the idea of a ‘menu’ of fetal tissue and organs that could be procured depending on the gestational age of the pregnancies being terminated and the number of patients who consent to donating is one I hope I never have to encounter again.”

Once again, which is it?

We must pray that this video will mark an important turning point in our nation’s conscience. Images and words can become seared in our minds. The horrifying knowledge of harvested baby hearts must lead to our own broken hearts.

A nation that will allow this, will allow anything.

Are Pro-lifers Imposing Their Values On Others? By Bill Muehlenberg

In the abortion wars the number of silly and patently fallacious arguments used by those sanctioning baby killing are many. Every lousy excuse they can dream of is used as they attack those seeking to defend the unborn from being led to the slaughter.

I have dealt with plenty of their bogus claims over the years, and there are plenty more that can be covered. Let me here deal with another commonly-used myth peddled by the pro-death camp. Abortion supporters are quite keen to tell those who are pro-life that they have no right to impose their moral views on other people.

abortion 21They claim that because some people are concerned about abortion, they are somehow taking away the freedoms of others, they are being busybodies, and they are acting as some sort of moral Taliban. They insist that on the abortion issue we must simply sit down and shut up.

But there are all sorts of problems with this line of thinking. Firstly, in a democracy, all points of view are entitled to a hearing. That is exactly what makes for a democracy: allowing the free flow of ideas, and enabling countering views on contentious issues to be freely presented and discussed. And after all, does not the other side claim the banner of ‘choice’? Why then do they seek to deny the other side the right to be heard?

And this myth is based on the false idea of tolerance, which has become the greatest virtue in contemporary culture. Tolerance used to mean respecting the other person while disagreeing with his or her ideas. Today it means you must accept the other person’s views, or be seen as intolerant, judgmental and narrow-minded.

But, as Francis Beckwith argues in his important 1993 volume, Politically Correct Death, “to be tolerant of differing viewpoints involves just that – differing viewpoints, all of which cannot be equally correct at the same time”. And as American philosopher J. Budziszewski has pointed out:

If you really believe that the meaning of tolerance is tolerating, then you ought to tolerate even intolerance. If you really believe that the best foundation for toleration is to avoid having strong convictions about good and evil, then you should not try to harbour the strong conviction that intolerance is bad. . . . Consistency would require that if it is intolerant to prohibit the abortion of babies in the womb, then it must also be intolerant to prohibit their protection.

And values are being pushed all the time. The real question “is not whether values are going to be imposed or legislated, but whose values” as Carl Horn puts it. It just so happens that at the moment, the values of the pro-death camp are predominating, legally, socially and culturally.

They are certainly imposing their values on the rest of society, and they are very proud of it. That is why they do not want the other side to be heard. They enjoy the ideological hegemony they currently possess. They see it as a major threat when the other side is allowed a word in edgewise.

Moreover, on important moral issues we need to speak out. Should we tolerate polluters, racists and rapists? This is like saying ‘I am personally against environmental destruction, racism and rape, but who am I to push my personal beliefs onto others’. When the protection of innocent life is at stake, we not only have the right but a duty to speak out.

And such moral concerns need to be reflected in the law. Issues as important as killing human beings need to fall under the domain of civil law. As Stephen Schwarz has rightly stated, “All civil rights should be protected by law”. The truth is, basically all law is imposed morality.

Let me conclude with some wise words from F. Lagard Smith on these matters of tolerance and imposing one’s views. They come from his excellent 1990 volume, When Choice Becomes God. He rightly notes that “few of us really want to be in the business of deciding what is acceptable behaviour for everybody else.” But, he continues,

neither have we abandoned altogether being our brother’s keeper. Just let the Ku Klux Klan resurrect lynching, or have some group of neo-Nazis talk about exterminating Jews again, and we will all throw down our pro-choice banners and become the most intolerant people you ever saw – and rightly so. They could talk all day long about their “right to decide,” but we wouldn’t tolerate it.
Under those circumstances not one of us is going to say, “I’m personally against lynching and genocide, but I don’t want to impose my values on others.” When innocent life is at stake, we realise that we can no longer be pro-choice. At that point, pro-choice is a license to kill.

In the battle over abortion, the question simply cannot be framed as one of tolerance. If an unborn baby is not a human life worthy of protection, then let the woman decide whether to have an abortion. On the other hand, if an unborn baby is in fact a human life worthy of protection, then a woman can have no choice. When innocent life is at stake, we have no choice but to protect it. To do otherwise would be to invoke the tyranny of tolerance.

Saying no to pro-choice on the issue of abortion is not for the purpose of imposing our values on others. It is to keep others from imposing their values upon those who, because they are powerless to defend themselves, will never have a chance to choose their own values.

Yes exactly right. When it comes to defending the innocent against their destruction, it is high time indeed that we impose a bit of morality.


Deborah Nucatola, Adolf Eichmann, And The Banality Of Murder

Planned Parenthood makes the Third Reich’s journey in eugenics look like child’s play and after this recent bout of PP being caught selling cut up children, the obvious parallels are becoming clear even for people who maintain that murdering children is totally okay.

You can catch Deborah Nucatola’s sales pitch below:

The following article Planned Parenthood, Adolf Eichmann and the Banality of Evil by Wallace Henley gives us a disturbing look into the mind of the kinds of people who murder people and how an entire society can simply wander along with them on that genocidal journey:

Deborah Nucatola, the Planned Parenthood doctor caught on video chatting about the harvesting and sale of infant body parts over a bulbous glass of wine, brings to mind Adolf Eichmann’s manner as he was on trial in Jerusalem in 1963 for being a major henchman in Hitler’s Holocaust.
Hannah Arendt, a Jewish philosopher and writer who was able to get out of Germany before the worst of Hitler and the Nazis fell upon her people, covered the trial for The New Yorker. Later she wrote a book, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.

Arendt was struck by Eichmann’s nonchalance on the stand and in court. She thought of the word, “banal,” meaning hum-drum, ordinary, as one would feel about performing trivial activities, like filing papers, sweeping a floor, counting sheep, or nailing nails.

Eichmann helped lead the killing of at least 11 million people in the concentration camps. Yet he was simply doing his job, he protested, much as he did before the war as a traveling salesman, or during his post-war period in Argentina when he became manager of a rabbit farm, and later a welder in a Mercedes-Benz plant.

It was in the midst of the most banal of activities — going through the routine of catching a bus — that Israeli Mossad agents caught him and brought him to Jerusalem.

Nucatola was captured on video in a Los Angeles restaurant. “A lot of people” want livers of unborn babies, she said as she sipped and munched. She could only say “Wow!” when she had discovered how great is the demand for pre-born infants’ hearts. Nucatola was as casual in her description of the most efficient removal of heads and other organs from the human in the womb as Eichmann might have been tallying up the number of cattle cars to transport Jews and other non-Aryans to Auschwitz.

Critics protest when people in the pro-life movement call abortion on the scale performed by Planned Parenthood a new “holocaust” — that of the unborn human beings. But, try as it may — and Planned Parenthood spokespersons have done their best — this time, through one of its own, the huge, well-funded, abortion provider cannot hide.

Any more than Eichmann could hide in South America.

Jesus said that “all that is secret will eventually be brought into the open” (Luke 8:17). “God will bring our darkest secrets to light, and will reveal our private motives,” says the Bible, in 1 Corinthians 4:5 (NLT).

That goes for all of us, not just a doctor in an abortion organization.

Arendt was struck by Eichmann’s “stock phrases and self-invented clichés” that were part of the in-house technical parlance that disguised the reality of the Nazis’ deeds. So the people Nucatola presided over as they performed the slicing of babies are “providers,” and the material extracted “tissues.” In making sure the product is intact, “one must be cognizant of where you put your graspers.”

The remnant of civilized people left in the propagandized culture of our day have to wonder how a person can sit in a chic restaurant and talk in a banal fashion of the hacking of a human infant yet in the “sanctuary” of the womb.

In Eichmann’s case, Israeli court psychiatrists had examined him and found him a “completely normal man,” Arendt reported. The implication, she said, was that “the coexistence of normality and bottomless cruelty explodes our ordinary conceptions.”

Nucatola’s hackneyed chitter-chatter was such an explosion. The aura of the normality of removing a complete body part from a living human being blasts at the foundations of sanity.

Arendt reflected on what could produce an Eichmann and masses of people who thought and behaved as he did.

“The aim of totalitarian education has never been to instill convictions but to destroy the capacity to form any,” she said.

Nucatola is a product of schools that helped students clarify values until they have no values, education systems that have excluded study of the transcendent truth to which all are accountable, and academies that level and teach the equivalency of all phenomena.

This is the scholastic world that has given us, for example, Princeton ethics (!) professor Peter Singer who advances the idea that “the life of a newborn (human) is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee.”

Oh, the banality of it all.

“The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him,” wrote Hannah Arendt. They “were neither perverted nor sadistic,” just “terribly and terrifyingly normal.”

That, perhaps, is what is so frightening about Deborah Nucatola. She is the poster child for the new normal of the culture the elites have foisted on America. “Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda.”

So Hollywood, the progressive academy, the mainstream media, the corrupted pulpit and other propaganda machines will continue to crank out the banalities that will influence that portion of the mass demographic that still elects to office leaders of any and all parties who will contrive the policies that certify the abnormal as normal and the criminal as legal.

Another Bible passage comes to mind: “The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron” (1 Timothy 4:1-2 NIV).

The only way one can banally banter over lunch about mutilating a human being is through a seared conscience. A society that continues not to be appalled at such activity suffers from a collective seared conscience.

Deborah Nucatola shows these are indeed “later times.”

It’s a terrifying read in many ways and one that is very necessary for all Christians.

We truly are at the latter end of this age and still we will see even worse happen before Jesus returns. We need to be ready and firmly grounded in his love so that the shocking evil to come does not steal away our hope.

“Therefore, having this ministry by the mercy of God, we do not lose heart. But we have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways. We refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God’s word, but by the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God. And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. But we have this treasure in jars of clay, to show that the surpassing power belongs to God and not to us. We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed; always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be manifested in our bodies. For we who live are always being given over to death for Jesus’ sake, so that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh. So death is at work in us, but life in you. Since we have the same spirit of faith according to what has been written, “I believed, and so I spoke,” we also believe, and so we also speak, knowing that he who raised the Lord Jesus will raise us also with Jesus and bring us with you into his presence. For it is all for your sake, so that as grace extends to more and more people it may increase thanksgiving, to the glory of God. So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison, as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.” ‭‭2 Corinthians‬ ‭4:1-18‬ ‭ESV‬‬