Syrian Refugee In Germany Burns Down His Hotel Accomodation, Spray Paints Swastikas On Walls To Implicate People Who Warn About The Dangers Of Muslim Refugees

This story is hardly uncommon these days.

It’s all part of Islam in its new home: The West.

A SYRIAN refugee has admitted smearing swastikas and starting a fire at the asylum centre where he was staying because he wanted to be moved to a better location.

The blaze badly damaged the hotel in the town of Bingen am Rhein in Rhineland-Palatina last week

The blaze badly damaged the hotel in the town of Bingen am Rhein in Rhineland-Palatinat, Germany, last week, where a number of refugees and seasonal workers were living.

The apparent racist attack caused outrage in Germany, and was widely reported in local media with demands that those responsible be tracked down and punished. 

The 26-year-old Syrian told police he was fed up with the cramped living conditions in the hotel. 

He had been living there for six months when he started the fire which left four residents and two firefighters needing treatment for smoke inhalation, police revealed.

The refugee sprayed the swastikas on the building in a bid to put responsibility for the blaze on right-wing extremists.

Detectives arrested the man after other residents identified him as the arsonist.

He is currently being held in custody.

His arrest came a secret plan devised by Brussels was revealed, which could see countries in the European Union take on 250,000 migrants from Turkey every single year.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/659981/Syrian-refugee-smeared-swastikas-started-fire-asylum-centre

The Problem Of The West: Socialist Policy, Low Birth Rates And Growing Muslim Immigration

Daniel Greenfield sums up a lot of the problems in the West right here:

Daniel Greenfield: There’s an old Hemingway quote about going bankrupt. How did you go bankrupt? Two ways, gradually and then suddenly. Here in the United States, we’ve had a front row seat to gradual bankruptcy. What does that mean? Under Obama, good policies have been replaced by bad policies. Good money has been replaced by bad money. Debt has been piled up in every state of the union. We have the same speech. The state of the union is strong. We’re investing trillions of dollars in Muslim, green energy self-esteem. Of course, that’s not an investment because an investment is when you get money back. It’s just spending, but that’s how you go bankrupt. And at the end of the day, the bill comes due and suddenly it’s, “Where did all the money go?” “How did we suddenly go bankrupt?”

Now demographic bankruptcy is also a very real thing. Economic bankruptcy is when you have no more money. You wake up one morning. There’s no more money. Demographic bankruptcy is when you wake up one morning. There are no kids, and this is a very real problem. You’ve heard China is abandoning its one-child policy. It’s now going to be a two-child policy. Germany though has a one-child policy of its own. The German birthrate is 1.3. That’s a one-child policy. That’s a 1.3-child policy. There’s a slight problem here because if you’ve got a birthrate of 1.3, and you’ve got socialism, who is going to pay for all of this? The entire system is based on the idea that the next generation is going to pay in, and the next generation is going to pay in, and this whole thing can keep running along indefinitely, but the Europeans aren’t having kids. I grew up in Europe myself for sometime, and it wasn’t unusual. I was one of the few kids running around. There are a lot of elderly people. There were some middle aged people. There were not that many young people, and it’s actually getting worse these days.

So if you look at Germany, Germany is a very bad case scenario, but there are even countries that have lower birth rates. Now this is a problem because in the normal birth rate, you’re supposed to have a pyramid. The younger workers at the bottom. Then it gets narrower. There are the middle age, and then there are the elderly. In Europe, the pyramid is upside down. You have the elderly at the very top. You have a small wedge of people who are middle aged, and you have a shrinking wedge of people who are young, which means they are going demographically bankrupt. Now Europe has been going demographically bankrupt for awhile now because of its falling birth rates, so the socialists who run it have come up with an absolutely amazing plan, which socialist plans can’t possibly fail. They’re going to solve this demographic bankruptcy and this resulting economic bankruptcy when there’s nobody to do the work or pay the bills or even write the welfare checks by bringing in millions and millions of Muslims to fill in the gap. So you’re going to have people from high birth rate countries come in, and they’re going to be at the very bottom of the pyramid.

They’re going to do the work, so Hans and Fritz will retire. They can retire at 55 or whatever. He’ll get his pension, and that’ll be fine, and Mohammed will come in, and he’ll work hard, and he will have a lot of kids, and the whole socialist system will keep working great. There’s just one, tiny, little, minor problem with it, and I’m not talking about the terrorism, the Sharia, the no-go zones, the attacks on Jews, or all the other fun stuff. There’s just one other minor problem, which is that the people coming in don’t actually work. Muslim unemployment rates, yeah. I mean you can count on socialists to bring in more people who don’t work to a country where the problem is that too many people already aren’t working.

But Muslim unemployment rates in Europe, it’s not unusual to see unemployment rates in the 20 and 30 percentile range. Among youth, you see unemployment rates in the 50 and 60 percent range, and that’s not because, as the excuses go, they’re disaffected. They’re not given work. They’re not given opportunities. They don’t want to work, and why should they want to work? Because there’s a basic cultural difference between Europe, between the West, and Islam, the Muslim world. Europe, the West, we’re a work ethic culture. We believe in working. We believe in coming home and saying okay, honey, what did you do? I worked 8 hours a day. That’s great. The Muslim world, it does not work like that because the Muslim world is a slave culture. We’re in the south now. We’re in Charleston. We’re supposed to feel very bad about slavery, which is a 19th century thing in America. In the Muslim world, it’s a 20th century thing.

Saudi Arabia abolished slavery, I believe, in 1962. 1962. The JFK administration came to the Saudis, and they said maybe you should give human rights to women, and let people vote and get rid of the slaves. Back then we had a little more leverage with the Saudis than we do now, so the Saudis grumbled and said all right. All right. Fine. We’ll get rid of the slaves. That was 1962. That was a great moment in Muslim human rights. The Muslim world has never really abolished slavery especially in the Middle East except because of European pressure. The English forced the Egyptians, for example, to get rid of slavery. The Saudis still have slavery, by the way. They just made it an even worse form of slavery. The original form of slavery, the slave owners would at least take care of the kids. They would take care of the old people. It was still evil, but it was slightly less evil. The Saudis and the Kuwaitis and the Qataris moved on to this kind of concentration camp slavery where you take workers at the peak of their lives. You take young workers. You burn everything out of them. In some cases, you downright kill them. Then you dump them back to the country where they come from with some pocket change. This is concentration camp slavery.

It’s what the Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf, that’s what they’re built on. They have huge work forces. All these nice skyscrapers, you see all these paradises for the rich, they are built by slave labor. They are built by thousands of people just dying in the heat building this thing. They are built by this, and it’s like Sparta except we supply the military, and we supply the wealth, and they just sit around on their asses all day and own the slaves. That’s the Saudi — that’s all these societies. These are societies where the idea at the top is not to work. You do not work. You see all these leaders who are fat, who are ridiculously fat. They look like they have trouble walking across the room. The Saudi royals, Qatar, that’s because they don’t walk across the room. They sit on their asses all day, and they have these servants from Africa usually fanning them with palm leaves or whatever, and they’re not going to fan themselves with palm leaves because that’s what slaves are for. That’s how a slave culture works. Even the people who aren’t at the top believe that work is something you’re punished with. It’s not something you want to do, and socialists, by the way, believe the same thing. Work isn’t a good thing. It’s something you have to be forced to do.

This is a slave culture, and in the slave culture when people come into a country where it has generous socialism, that has generous welfare policies, they’re coming there not to work. In fact, you have the whole idea that these people are refugees. They are not refugees. They are not coming across the border from Syria, making it across the border into Germany, and saying, “Thank God, we’re in Germany now. We can be safe from the civil war.” That’s not how it is. They’re crossing into Jordan. They’re crossing into Turkey. In Turkey, there’s no war. There’s no war in Jordan. They stop being refugees the moment they leave Jordan or Turkey, and when they head to Europe, they’re no longer refugees. They are economic migrants. It is very important to remember that. There is no war in Turkey. There is no war in Jordan. They are not refugees once they leave Jordan or Turkey.

Now why are they going to Germany, for example? Why? What’s so great about Germany? Now I interviewed some of these guys, and they say you know what’s great about Germany? Hitler. We like Hitler. Germany is bringing in people to accord with tolerance and European values, and what these people admire most about Germany is Hitler. They may not have heard that he died awhile back, so they may be a little unclear about the details, but what’s so great about Germany? What’s so great about Sweden? Why are they all headed there? Welfare. It’s a great welfare state. You have a German teacher asking her students in class what they wanted to be when they grew up. Susie, what do you want to do when you grow up? I want to be an ecological engineer. Hans, what do you want to be when you grow up? I want to fly hot air balloons. Mohammed, what do want to be when you grow up? I want to be on Hartz IV. Hartz IV is Germany’s welfare. “Hartz” means “heart.” It’s because it’s very caring to give people free stuff, so they want to be on Hartz IV.

Germany has very generous welfare policies. So does Sweden. They don’t want to go to a lot of these countries. You have interviews with these refugees who are in Slovenia. They’ve never heard of Slovenia before. They’re not interested in Slovenia. They don’t want to live in Slovenia. Slovenia doesn’t have great, free stuff. They want to go to Germany for all the free stuff they can get, so Europe is dealing with its demographic bankruptcy by bringing in more people who don’t want to work, by bringing in more people who are going to take more out of the government than they’re going to pay into it. So the socialists have actually managed to take a crisis that they are responsible for and made it even worse. Now how did demographic bankruptcy happen in the first place? How did you get to a 1.3 child rate? That’s a ridiculous number. It’s not China. Nobody was forcing women to have abortions. Nobody was marching in at gunpoint forcing them to have abortions.

This was Germany. They voluntary did this to themselves, and it’s not just Germany. It’s across Europe. Why did this happen? This happened because they decided that their future wasn’t their children. There are two reasons that people have children. One’s slightly cynical. Children take care of you in your old age. The second one is that you care about children. Children are the future. Europe, of course, has no future because it doesn’t have children right now, so the first part, Muslims have high birth rates. They have very high birth rates, so when you have Muslims coming in to Sweden, you have Somalis, for example, coming into Sweden, they have a birth rate that’s three or four times higher than the Swedish population. Syrians are coming to Germany. Germany, as I said, has a birth rate of 1.3. Syrians have a birth rate twice that. Afghans, who are the second biggest group, forget about the Syrians. The Afghan refugee boom is now becoming very huge. It’s a country of 30 million. A quarter of them polled have said that they want to leave Afghanistan.

One hundred thousand are expected to try to get into Europe this year.

But their birth rate is much higher because this is an investment program. This is a retirement program. Their kids take care of them in their old age. In Europe, your kids don’t take care of you in your old age. The government takes care of you in your old age. Under socialism, you have a cradle to grave state. The problem is that Europe now has a lot more graves than it has cradles. It has a whole lot of people, who are elderly. It doesn’t have a lot of cradles. It doesn’t have a lot of kids. The Muslims are supposed to solve this problem, but, of course, their retirement plan is have a lot of kids, charge them for the government. It’s not a great plan because, again, you’re not producing any more workers.

Now the second idea was that in Europe the things you would care about were not your children. They would be progressive policies. People weren’t living to see — I want to see my kids get married. I want to live to see my grandkids get married. Hell, it’s I want to live to see the European Union. I want to live to see diversity, and they’re living to see it now. I want to see light rail. In the UK, they’re talking about it’s important to have no more than one child because of global warming. You can’t have too many children because of global warming. So global warming, leftist policies matter to them more than their kids. That’s why they have no kids. They have faced demographic bankruptcy because they faced economic bankruptcy, because they face ideological bankruptcy.

Now we’re not immune to this stuff. We’re going slower than Europe, but we’re also going gradually, politically bankrupt. We’re going economically bankrupt, and we’re going demographically bankrupt. The Muslim population in the United States has increased 67 percent since September 11. It’s a great way to commemorate September 11. Sixty-seven percent increase. The Muslim population in the United States is younger. Their birth rate is higher just like in Europe. In the UK, you can look at the sea at the bottom level. When you hear that Mohammed is the most popular name in the UK for children or the most popular name for children in Oslo — so Oslo is 10 percent Muslim, but it’s Muslim at the bottom where it matters, where the children are. And England and Wales it’s 4 percent Muslim, but if you look at the children under 4, 9 percent are Muslim, and that is the future.

We think economic bankruptcy, the numbers sometimes sneak up on you because we don’t pay attention to the numbers that matter. When it comes to demographic bankruptcy, the numbers that matter are under 30, under 20, under 10, under 4. The median age in Germany is 46. The median Muslim age in Germany is 34. They are a much younger population. They’re having more kids which means they define the future. Now this is important for us to realize because this immigration thing is not just a problem of borders. It’s a problem of values. It’s important for us to have the children. It’s important for us to raise the children that are going to be the future because if we fail to do that, if we do what the Europeans do then we turn it over. At some point we’re going to be facing an economic crisis, and we’re going to do what the Germans did, which is say we can bail ourselves out with 5,000, 10,000 Muslims. Germany expects 1.5 million Muslims, according to a leaked government document, but with family reunification that can be up to 7.3 million people, and that’s just one country.

They’re promising that this is going to solve our demographic problems. This is going to be the future, but what they’ve really done is said that our future, socialism, matters more to us than our country. It matters more to us than our people. It matters more to us than our children. We can’t allow our United States to go that route. We can’t allow refugee resettlement to fill our cities, to fill our towns with people who are supposed to be our future, who we are told are going to do the work that we don’t want to do. Socialism is the underlying problem here. The migration we’re seeing is caused by socialism. It’s caused by left-wing policies, and now the left wing as it always does manages to make a crisis that they caused even worse. The United States is now going to be facing the same crisis. We saw that again with Obama recently. We’re going to be seeing more and more of it as time goes by. If we don’t recover the birth rate, if we don’t fundamentally change the demographics, we’re going to go the way of Europe.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261007/muslim-migration-europe-eurabia-come-true-frontpagemagcom

Austria, Germany: One In Two Refugees Facing Criminal Charges, Refugees Commit Minimum 50% Of All Crimes

This is no surprise to anyone.

Last week we reported that based on newly released statistics from the German government, 45% of all crimes come from Merkel’s new “refugees.” Well, Germany’s southern neighbor, Austria, has confirmed Germany’s conclusions through its own statistics. According to their numbers, a minimum of 50% of all crimes are committed by these new “refugees.” Not only that, but Austria has proved these numbers are consistent going back as far as 2003.

The mathematical statistics bear out what everybody else knows from lived experience: the refugees are the source of the problems.

From the Kroner:

Statistics from the Federal Criminal Agency show that in the period 2003 to 2014 one of of every two asylum seekers had criminal charges filed against them. In this it is striking that most of the crimes were committed by people from Algeria (155 per 100 asylum applicants), Georgia (151) and Nigeria (129). According to a “Presse” report, among Syrians the number is around 8 – however the year 2015, in which the major flow of refugees from Syria set in, is not included. 80% of the crimes were committed by men.

From 2003 to 2014 the annual clear-up rate for crimes in Austria was between 40 and 45 per cent. In three to five per cent of cases, asylum seekers were determined to be the perpetrators. That is relatively high as the share of asylum seekers in the entire population – depending on year – was only around 0.1 to 0.3%. The statistics only include migrants who also receive basic provision pay-outs from the Austrian state.

http://shoebat.com/2016/03/14/first-german-now-austrian-government-admits-that-minimum-50-of-all-crimes-come-from-the-new-refugees/

Lone Leftist Commentator On Islam-Inspired Mass Sexual Assualt Of Women Across Europe Uses Opportunity To Criticize All Of Us Who Warned This Has Been Happening For Years

It’s all our fault.

It’s our racist, bigoted, xenophobia that caused Muslim immigrants to sexually assault women all over Europe, both on New Year’s and for the past couple of decades.

But the good news is we are wrong!

Multiculturalism actually works fine. Islam really is the “religion of peace”. Women do need to learn how not to provoke Muslim men to grope them.

I loathe to promote this drivel but a few select quotes with some commentary is required just to drive home the point that genuine Leftists are so deluded, no undermining of their Marxist agenda will make them question. They are hopelessly lost in their own idiocy and they are bent on dragging us all down with them. 

It really is Communism all over again with these people.

Shall we?

Commentators have a responsibility to discuss the shocking events that took place in Cologne, because those who want to exploit this story for their preferred agendas won’t be so reluctant, writes Michael Bradley.

One sentence in and already the blame is not with the thousands of Muslim men who sexually assaulted hundreds of women but rather with people like me and many others who have warned about the inherent dangers of both Islam and the Leftist idol of multiculturalism.

Nice euphemism with “shocking events” Michael – how about actually mentioning the rape and sexual assaults perpetrated by Muslim men before you start attacking conservatives, Christians, or anyone who has ever experienced the rotten fruit of Islam and Marxist multiculturalism.

I am speaking of the mass incidents of sexual assault on women in Cologne and other cities in Germany on New Year’s Eve, and the fascinating near-silence with which the media has responded.

Nice try Michael. 

While you got the “silence” part right, it’s neither fascinating nor surprising and most importantly, it’s only silence from the Leftist mainstream media who don’t want to reveal the catastrophic disaster that is their favourite idol: multiculturalism. 

It’s not surprising because Leftists will happily silence any opposition to their ideas. They historically did it using violence but in the West these days, they control significant parts of the education system, the legal system, and the media and so “silencing” can be a legal threat or through marginalisation or omission.

Just think about how often we hear about homosexuality and transgender in the the mainstream media when there really aren’t that many of them (2-3% of the population), or how little we saw reports about the horrors of Planned Parenthood’s organ trade.

When was the last time you saw coverage of Christian persecution by Muslims all across the Middle East and Africa? Personally, I saw it once in the past decade. Once!

It’s hard to disagree with the German justice minister’s conclusion that the attacks in Cologne must have been planned and coordinated.

It is hard, Michael. Really hard. Thousands of Muslim men coordinating thefts and sexual assaults. 

It’s hard to continue to believe multiculturalism works too.

Focusing on the act rather than the cause should also trigger a more mature debate than we’ve been able to have so far about the correct balance between the surveillance capabilities of the state and the civil liberties of the people.

Ah, all we need is a bit more statism to solve our problems. 

Obviously, what then is that the forces of the far right, the anti-immigration lobby, ultra-nationalists, racists and xenophobes will say “We told you so.” While that will be as unhelpfully meaningless as everything else they say, their myopic cause-and-effect worldview now has some handy supporting evidence.

Who wants to add fuel to that fire? We’re already awash with bigotry, and 2016 is shaping up to be a banner year for destructive hatred targeted by race, religion, gender and every other point of difference we can find. Cologne is a flaming match nobody wants to throw onto the pyre.

Straight to ad hominem, mud slinging and name calling. Typical Leftist. When you don’t have an argument, as Michael ruefully admitted, he makes it clear who the real enemy is: anyone who puts the blame for these sexual assaults where it belongs: Muslim refugees.

If you don’t like Islam, you’re a bigot. Period.

It’s not like Islam has caused the murder of 240,000,000 plus people…

Oh.

How exactly are we awash with bigotry?

Oh, that’s right, because Leftists say so. In fact, Marxists have always made a living of dividing society into groups by superficial differences and accusing one group to promote conflict. “Divide and conquer” is a saying for a reason, y’know. Marxists divide so they can conquer society and they have given it a good go.

What started as a conflict between the proletariat and the bourgeois to bring about a social utopia end up killing a heck of a lot of people while a select few Marxist leaders reaped the benefits of “social equality”.

Any “point of difference” can be used by Marxists like Michael, who always present themselves as the kind, accepting saviours (if only you vote them into government money and power). Just consider how Leftists bash white people to gain the support of blacks, how they bash men to gain the support of women, or how they bash Western Christian values to promote any value that is abnormal and immoral, be it homosexuality, gender theory, murdering children through abortion, multiculturalism.

The total upheaval of Western culture over the past 70 years or so is unprecedented but certainly no accident.

Our culture was indoctrinated into Marxism, primarily through the education system and mainstream media.

On the far right, this easily translates to “all Muslims don’t respect women”, and worse. On the left, it leaves confusion. The benighted hordes of tragic humanity are not entirely what we’d like them to be. The truth is much messier than either polarity would prefer.

Let’s finish with this misleading red herring.

Nobody says ALL Muslims anything – we are clearly warning against the raping, murdering terrorist types (unsurprisingly common).

Islam maketh the Muslim. Muslims do not maketh the Islam.

Plenty of Muslims know very little about Islam and so they are pretty nice people. 

No one is stupid enough to believe that every single Nazi was like Adolf Hitler. Plenty were useful idiots caught up in the movement without realising the catastrophic end goal while others were cowards who chose to save themselves.

The only point is that Nazis came in different shapes and sizes but Nazism is what it is.

Likewise, a Muslim can change how he or she behaves but Islam is an unchangeable ideology according to its own texts and doctrine. Even more importantly, the life of Mohammed is to Islam what the life of Jesus is to Christianity: the perfect example of the faith.

Islam is where the problem lies and the closer a Muslim follows Islam, the more dangerous they become.

And Leftists who want to defend Islam are doing it to the death of our entire culture.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-14/bradley-silence-about-cologne-only-adds-to-the-harm/7086702

Muslim Refugee In Germany Throws Children, Aged Seven, Five, And One, Out Of Two Story Window

Wonder why this one didn’t make the news, given that one time when everyone on earth repeatedly heard all about Michael Jackson dangling his kid over the balcony for a moment?

Or that one time anyone hurt their children?

I guess we’ll never know.

I couldn’t find any English-language news reports on this incident. However, an article at FOCUS.de is fairly clear in machine translation.

The asylum center is in Lohmar in Rhein-Sieg-Kreis. The 35-year-old Syrian father was arrested after his children were thrown from the windows of the center. Police suspect that he may have deliberately attempted to kill them.

Many thanks to Nash Montana for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for subtitling this news report from RT:

Transcript:

1:00 At the scene we found three injured children ages five, seven and one year.

1:04 The five- and the seven-year-old children are apparently severely injured

1:10 and have been transported to the trauma center. The one-year-old child

1:13 was injured only lightly and it was brought to the children’s clinic.

1:22 According to witnesses the two heavily-injured children fell

1:26 from two different windows. What happened with the third lightly-injured child

1:30 is at this point not clear yet.   

http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/02/syrian-refugee-allegedly-defenestrates-his-three-children-at-german-asylum-center/#more-38692

Women Need To Change Their Behaviour So Men Don’t Rape Them

That is the message we are getting from “Progressive” Leftist Germany in the wake of one hundred women being sexually assaulted and raped by Muslim immigrants to Cologne.

I sure hope you don’t agree with it and are beginning to question, if you never have, what the Left really are trying to achieve with their insane protectionism of everything Islam, even at the expense of sexually assaulted women!

Jamie Glazov’s article gives us a disturbing picture of the new Europe:

Introduction: As the disturbing reports pour in about the New Year’s Eve Muslim sex assaults in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Finland and other European countries, it has become clear that the new Utopian Multicultural Europe that the Left has worked so hard to build is now here. Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker’s response to the assaults under her watch has been to reprimand the victims, suggesting that they had asked for it. She has vowed to make sure that women will change their behavior, so that they don’t provoke Muslims to sexually assault them again. There will now be published “online guidelines” for women to read so they can prepare themselves. One wonders if it will be the burqa or the niqab that will be the solution of choice.

These eerie developments are, of course, completely in line with why Naomi Wolf finds the hijab “sexy” and why Oslo Professor of Anthropology Dr. Unni Wikan’s solution for the high incidence of Muslims raping Norwegian women is not for the rapists to be punished, but for Norwegian women to “take their share of responsibility” for the rapes because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. Norwegian women, she has counseled, “must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

We are also now aware that German police fired water cannons at German protesters in Cologne who gathered to protest the rapes and sexual assaults committed by the Muslim refugees. Right, it is not the Muslim migrants who committed sex assaults that are being shot at with water cannons, but those who feel that what they did violates women’s rights and western values.

In response to this new horrifying European reality, in which if you are a kuffar female who is raped it means you asked for it, we are running below Jamie Glazov’s article “How Vittorio Arrigoni Went to Gaza Hoping to Die” from PJMedia’s April 18, 2011 issue. The article unveils the death wish in the heart of the Left and in the impulses of its fellow travelers. In so doing, it crystallizes the pathological mindset of the progressive elites running Western Europe today and why they have created the toxic and suicidal circumstances in which their own women are now victims of mass sexual assaults by followers of a totalitarian and misogynist ideology — and why they, the elites, are shaming the victims and taking the side of the perpetrators.

When one grasps that the yearnings of Western Europe’s rulers today are the same yearnings that Vittorio Arrigoni indulged, the whole picture becomes transparently clear.

*

How Vittorio Arrigoni Went to Gaza Hoping to Die.

By Jamie Glazov.

Bit by bit, decorate it, arrange the details, find the ingredients, imagine it, choose it, get advice on it, shape it into a work without spectators, one which exists only for oneself, just for the shortest little moment of life.

—Michel Foucault, describing the pleasure of preparing oneself for suicide.

The Italian cheerleader for Hamas, Vittorio Arrigoni, has died at the hands of the Islamic terrorism that he venerated throughout his life. The fellow traveler journeyed to the Gaza Strip to prostrate himself before his secular deity, Hamas, and to assist its venture of perpetrating genocide against Israelis. Islamic terrorists, who call themselves “Salafists,” showed their gratitude to Arrigoni by kidnapping, mercilessly beating, and executing him.

This episode was, of course, all part of an expected script: even though the media and our higher literary culture never discuss the reasons, the historical record reveals one undeniable fact: like thousands of political pilgrims before him, Vittorio Arrigoni went to Gaza to die. Indeed, consciously or unconsciously, in their unquenchable quest for sacrificing human life on the altar of their utopian ideals, fellow travelers always lust for death, and if not the death of others, then of their own.

It is no coincidence that a short while before “Salafists” killed Arrigoni, Juliano Mer-Khamis, a cheerleader of terrorism in Israel who, like Arrigoni, dedicated his life to praising the Palestinian death cult and working for the annihilation of Israel, was murdered by Islamic terrorists in Jenin. It is no coincidence that Rachel Corrie, the infamous enabler of the International Solidarity Movement, a group that disrupts anti-terrorism activities of the Israel Defense Forces, committed suicide in protecting Hamas terrorists by throwing herself in front of an Israeli bulldozer. And it is no coincidence that female leftist “peace” activists are routinely raped, brutalized, and enslaved by the Arabs of Judea and Samaria that they come to aid and glorify in their Jew-hating odyssey against Israel. And don’t hold your breath, by the way, waiting for leftist feminists to protest this phenomenon; they are faithfully following in the footsteps of American fellow traveler Anna Louise Strong and the Stalinist German writer Bertolt Brecht, two typical leftist believers who were completely undisturbed by the arrests and deaths of their friends in the Stalinist purges — having never even inquired about them after their disappearance.

Beneath the leftist believer’s veneration of the despotic enemy lies one of his most powerful yearnings: to submit his whole being to a totalist entity. This psychological dynamic involves negative identification, whereby a person who has failed to identify positively with his own environment subjugates his individuality to a powerful, authoritarian entity, through which he vicariously experiences a feeling of power and purpose. The historian David Potter has succinctly crystallized this phenomenon:

. . . most of us, if not all of us, fulfill ourselves and realize our own identities as persons through our relations with others; we are, in a sense, what our community, or as some sociologists would say, more precisely, what our reference group, recognizes us as being. If it does not recognize us, or if we do not feel that it does, or if we are confused as to what the recognition is, then we become not only lonely, but even lost, and profoundly unsure of our identity. We are driven by this uncertainty into a somewhat obsessive effort to discover our identity and to make certain of it. If this quest proves too long or too difficult, the need for identity becomes psychically very burdensome and the individual may be driven to escape this need by renouncing his own identity and surrendering himself to some seemingly greater cause outside himself. 

This surrender to the totality involves the believer’s craving not only to relinquish his individuality to a greater whole but also, ideally, to sacrifice his life for it. Lusting for his own self-extinction, the believer craves martyrdom for the idea. As Eric Hoffer points out in his classic The True Believer, the opportunity to die for the cause gives meaning to the believer’s desire to shed his inner self: “a substitute embraced in moderation cannot supplant and efface the self we want to forget. We cannot be sure that we have something worth living for unless we are ready to die for it.”

Thus, Vittorio Arrigoni, Juliano Mer-Khasin, and Rachel Corrie were simply just faithfully continuing the long suicidal tradition of their political faith. We are well aware, after all, of the dark fate of the believers who journeyed to Russia after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution to build communism; we are well versed of what happened to the leftist Iranians who returned to their country after the 1979 Iranian Revolution to aid Khomeini in building the Islamic paradise. Only those who cannot accept the true motivations of utopian believers can still deny what those political pilgrims were searching for in their odyssey to shed themselves of their own unwanted selves.

Does one need to excessively explain why “progressive” feminist Naomi Klein called out for bringing “Najaf to New York” in her infamous 2004 column in The Nation, in which she reached her hand out in solidarity to Muqtada al-Sadr and his Islamofascist Mahdi Army in the Iraqi Shi’ite stronghold of Najaf? Bringing Najaf to New York would mean that the Iraqi Shi’ite stronghold, where Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army at one time ran their torture chambers and sowed their terror, would be replicated on America’s shores. What could Naomi Klein possibly see admirable in the vicious nihilistic terror of the Mahdi Army? Would she remain alive for more than sixty seconds upon contact with it?

Is it possible that Klein’s impulses are related to those of Noam Chomsky, a Jew, who has distinguished himself, among other intriguing ways, by traveling to Lebanon to personally embrace the leaders of Hezbollah, whose stated top priority is to rid the world of Jews?

The murder by Iraqi terrorists of American hostage Tom Fox in March 2006 was a perfect example of this pathological phenomenon. Fox was among four members of the leftist group Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) who were kidnapped by Islamic terrorists in Iraq in November 2005. Aside from voicing support for the terrorists, one of the group’s most powerfully articulated themes entailed the longing for death. In the 1984 speech, “God’s People Reconciling,” for example, which gave rise to the formation of the Christian Peacemaker Teams, Mennonite minister Ron Sider urged his listeners: “We must be prepared to die by the thousands.”

It is not unsurprising that when British and American troops rescued the other three CPT hostages and saved their lives, the freed captives refused to thank their liberators — who had risked their own lives participating in the rescue — or to cooperate in a critical debriefing session with intelligence officers. Doug Pritchard, the co-chairman of CPT, went out of his way to tell the world that the kidnapping itself (and by implication Fox’s murder) was America’s fault, not the kidnappers’ or the executioners’. “The illegal occupation of Iraq by multinational forces,” he affirmed, was the “root cause” of the kidnappings. In other words, the devil made them do it.

The freed captives resented the fact that they had been liberated by the very forces they despised. And the rescuers had robbed the remaining hostages of the idealized fate suffered by Fox. Jan Benvie, an Edinburgh teacher who was getting ready to go to Iraq with the group in the summer of 2006, learned the lesson well. She announced before her departure: “We make clear that if we are kidnapped we do not want there to be force or any form of violence used to release us.”

To the end of his life, the French philosopher Michel Foucault, who supported and adored Khomeini’s killing fields, adamantly defended “everyone’s right to kill himself.” Suicide, he boastfully wrote in a 1979 essay, was “the simplest of pleasures.” 

Is it a coincidence that Foucault, who had attempted to kill himself several times out of guilt feelings regarding his homosexuality, passionately supported an Islamic death cult that murdered homosexuals?

Gaza terrorists have a long history of kidnapping and abusing, raping and killing those who come to aid and abet them.

Vittorio Arrigoni knew that very well.

In the end, Arrigoni’s story is the story of the Left — a story best summarized by the dictum of Goethe’s devil, which Marx perpetually invoked, as he did in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon: “All that exists deserves to perish.”

Arrigoni is the contemporary poster boy for the political pilgrims who traveled to despotisms to help build the paradises in which they hoped to shed themselves of their own unwanted selves. They paid the ultimate price. And no lesser cost must be paid for the momentous transformation of sterilizing the unclean earth. Such disinfection can be made possible only by the purifying power of human blood — blood which, in the utopian enterprise, must, in the final chapter, become one’s own.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261404/lefts-embrace-islamic-rape-jamie-glazov

“Beautiful Breasts”, “I Want To Have Sex With You”, “I’ll Kill You”: An Islamic Immigrants Translation Guide To A Good Night Out In Cologne

“We told you so” doesn’t even begin to cover it anymore.

TWO ‘immigrant’ men arrested in connection with the Cologne sex attacks after over 100 women reported being assaulted on New Year’s Eve.

Police have now confirmed one man was caught with notes translating to phrases like “beautiful breasts”, “I want to have sex with you” and “I’ll kill you”.

The city centre descended into chaos on the last day of 2015 when around 1,000 men of ‘Arab or North African’ origin reportedly attacked women and young girls.

The detained pair are understood to have been in custody overnight and notes in Arabic and German were found on their possession.

Neither has been named and their nationality has not been given.

Crowds of women protested against sexism outside Cologne Cathedral January 5 after the assaults.

The news follows claims in a leaked police report that some of the perpetrators of the Cologne sex attacks said they were Syrian refugees.

One told officers: “You have to treat me kindly! Mrs Merkel invited me.”

Similar attacks were reported in other German cities including Hamburg, Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Dusseldorf on the same night.

According to witnesses women on their own and in groups were “circled” by the men who openly groped them.

A police report also said terrified women had to run past the sex attack gang like a “gauntlet” to escape from them.

The evening has been described as “chaotic” with many alleged assaults taking place around the city’s train station.

Federal police, as opposed to Cologne city officers, were responsible for security inside the besieged train station. 

They say they quizzed nine Algerians, eight Moroccans, four Syrians, five Iranians, one Iraqi, one Serbian, and one US citizen following reports on the night. 

There were 18 asylum seekers among the 31 people stopped by the federal police, who also recorded three sexual assaults. 

The news has sparked anger across Germany, where many have been quick to accuse asylum seekers of carrying out the New Year’s Eve sexual assaults and robberies.

They added that it is a direct result of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s unpopular open door refugee policy.

In 2015 1.1million refugees arrived in Germany, putting strain on the country’s resources.

Germany’s justice minister Heiko Maas yesterday warned that “deportations would certainly be conceivable” for any asylum seeker found to have taken part in the New Year’s Eve attacks.

A government source said today the police chief of Cologne is set to resign following criticism of his handling of the violent clashes.

German police have been accused of lying about refugee involvement in the New Year’s Eve sex attacks in Cologne.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/632755/Cologne-German-police-sex-attacks-Migrants-Breasts

When Feminism Met Multiculturalism: In The Great Marxist Task Of Destroying The West, Islam Trumps Women

Feminism may have started out looking to do legitimately good things on behalf of women but like with all movements and organisations, it wasn’t long before Marxists had permeated the ranks.

It’s a handy way to grab power.

Where once women were looking for a vote and a little recognition, Marxists began pushing the division between men and women to chaotic new depths that have ultimately made society much worse for everyone, women included.

You can also thank feminists (Marxists with yet another façade) for the murder of untold numbers of women, albeit women who are still in the womb, thanks to the preference for male children across large swaths of the world.

Certainly, the Marxist attack against all that is just and good (Christianity) has been pretty successful as we can see with people willingly voting in the likes Barack Obama (who clearly hates the West), and our society doing everything it can to commit suicide.

And that’s where multiculturalism has been so successful.

If we aren’t murdering our future generations and reducing our population through convenient one-child parenting, we are replacing our population with people who have lots of children and really despise everything our culture stands for through the literally insane practise of multiculturalism.

Now, we are seeing the showdown between two entirely incompatible cultures and it seems that, as expected, the weak all-bracing, so-called tolerance of atheistic cultural Marxism is quaking in its boots before the not-afraid-to-violently-murder-everyone intolerance of Islam.

Women, it seems, are about to be thrown under the old Jihad bus, at least in multicultural pinup Germany:

On New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Germany, around 1,000 Muslim migrants congregated by the city’s main train station, where they sexually assaulted numerous women and gleefully defied police; one officer recounted that the attackers showed a lack of resoect for the police “like I have never experienced in my 29 years of public service.” An attacker crowed, “I’m a Syrian! You have to treat me kindly! Mrs. Merkel invited me.” In response, Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker has vowed to make sure that women change their behavior, so that they don’t provoke the poor dears to sexual assault again.

That’s right. As hard as it may seem to believe, Reker blamed the victims, and declared that corrective measures would be taken. She said: “The women and young girls have to be more protected in the future so these things don’t happen again.” She didn’t mean protected by police. “This means,” Reker continued, “they should go out and have fun, but they need to be better prepared, especially with the Cologne carnival coming up. For this, we will publish online guidelines that these young women can read through to prepare themselves.”

Reker’s words recalled a hadith in which Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, said to a Muslim woman: “‘O Asma, when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this,’ and he pointed to her face and hands.” (Sunan Abu Dawud 4092) The idea behind a woman covering everything except her face and hands is rooted in the assumption that if a man is tempted by her, it’s her fault. She can therefore try to quell that temptation by removing its impetus and covering up. If she fails to do so, or if she covers up and is attacked anyway, the fault lies entirely with her, and her family can cleanse itself of the dishonor she has brought upon them by putting her to death.

There is no room in this web of assumptions, which is all too common in the Islamic world, for the idea that if a man rapes or sexually assaults a woman, he bears the guilt. The guilt is all on his victim.

And now, Henriette Reker has shown us yet again that when multiculturalism and feminism come into conflict, multiculturalism always wins – at least when it comes to Islam. Feminists have been telling the world for decades that it is outrageous and wrong to say that a rape victim was “asking for it” because of the way she was dressed. But now, Reker has said essentially just that: if only the women in Cologne had been properly “prepared,” you see, if only they had access to the “guidelines” she is cooking up, then all would have been well. Reker said nothing about getting Muslim migrants “prepared” for life in Germany, and has made no announcement about issuing any “guidelines” for them about how to keep themselves from molesting women.

No, for Reker, as for Islamic supremacists everywhere, the responsibility to prevent sexual assault lies solely with them women. What, then, will her “guidelines” direct the non-Muslim women of Cologne to do? If she is consistent, they will tell women to buy a niqab. Buy a burqa. Or at very least to “dress modestly.” The “guidelines” will remind women that if they get attacked by migrants, it’s their own fault, as they should have been more careful.

And so Cologne’s Mayor slips without any evident hesitation into the Sharia mindset that it is entirely the woman’s responsibility to avoid tempting men, and entirely her fault if she is attacked.

The rape of captive non-Muslim women is sanctioned in Islamic tradition. One of Muhammad’s followers recounted:

We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them…(Sahih Muslim 3371)

There is no indication that they thought it necessary to obtain the consent of the women involved. They were just chattel. So also now, apparently, are the women of Cologne – and if they’re not “prepared,” so much the worse for them.

So my Marxist friends, always remember that there is plenty of room here in Christ and though you have done your best to eradicate Christianity from the lands, we still love you because Christ loves you.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261380/cologne-mayor-victims-migrant-sex-assaults-you-robert-spencer

Merkel’s New Germany: 1000 Muslim Men Sexually Assault And Rob 90 Women

Germany is becoming a dangerous place again.

It’s not the Nazis making it dangerous but rather their respected allies: Muslims.

Certainly, plenty of Muslims live peaceably but far too many are closely following the violent precedence established by Mohammed, the false prophet of Islam.

It comes as no unexpected irony that as Angela Merkel spent the New Year telling Germans to be more accepting of the 1.1 million Muslims she has opened German borders to, a massive gang of Muslim men has been sexually assaulting and robbing German women in Cologne.

Frankly, anyone with brains could have foreseen this:

About 90 women have reported being robbed, threatened or sexually molested at New Year celebrations outside Cologne’s cathedral by young, mostly drunk, men, police say, in events they have described as “a new dimension in crime”.

Key points:

Attackers looked as if they were from “Arab or North African region”

Attacks fuel calls from right-wing groups to stop letting in asylum seekers

Merkel and Cologne mayor promise tough response to attacks

Cologne police chief Wolfgang Albers told a news conference officers described the men as from “the Arab or North African region” and mostly between 18 and 35-years-old.

“We have one complaint that represents a rape,” he added.

Integration commissioner Aydan Ozoguz warned against putting foreigners and refugees, hundreds of thousands of whom have entered Germany largely from Middle Eastern war zones, under “blanket suspicion”.

Chancellor Angela Merkel expressed shock over the attacks, which police said occurred when about 1,000 men split into gangs as officers cleared a square to stop fireworks being thrown from the top of steps into the crowd below.

While politicians also urged people not to become wary of all refugees, the incident has fuelled calls from right-wing groups to stop letting in asylum seekers.

Germany took in just over 1 million last year, far more than any other European country.

Cologne mayor Henriette Reker said it was “unbelievable and intolerable what happened on New Year’s Eve” but there was no reason to believe those involved in the attacks were refugees.

Justice Minister Heiko Maas said Germany would not accept such attacks which he described as “a new scale of organised crime”.

Around 150 people gathered in front of Cologne’s cathedral on Tuesday evening to protest against violence against women.

One of them held a sign saying: “Ms Merkel, where are you? What do you say? This scares us!”

Merkel promises a ‘tough response’ to attacks

The right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has gained in polls in part at Ms Merkel’s expense thanks to a campaign against refugees, said she should close the border.

“Mrs Merkel, is Germany ‘colourful and cosmopolitan’ enough for you after the wave of crimes and sexual attacks?” AfD chief Frauke Petry tweeted.

 Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker addresses a news conference in Cologne

PHOTO: Police said an attack on Henriette Reker a day before she was elected mayor appeared to be motivated by her support for refugees. (Reuters: Wolfgang Rattay)

Ms Merkel told Ms Reker in a phone call the attacks deserved a tough response.

“Everything must be done to investigate those responsible as quickly and completely as possible and punish them, regardless of where they are from,” she said, according to her spokesman.

There are almost daily attacks on refugee shelters.

“Events like that in Cologne foster xenophobia,” said Roland Schaefer, head of Germany’s association of towns and localities.

After a crisis meeting, Cologne mayor Ms Reker said new steps would be taken to avoid a repeat, including increasing police numbers at big events and installing more security cameras.

She stressed that women must feel safe at traditional carnival celebrations next month when the city closes down for five days of drunken street parades and parties.

Ms Reker was stabbed in the neck and seriously hurt in October, just a day before she was elected mayor.

Police said that attack appeared to be motivated by her support for refugees.

It’s hilarious to note that the ABC begin reporting the rape, sexual assault, and robbery of women by Muslim men but spend the last half of the article essentially justifying it by calling Germans xenophobi.

That’s leftist for you.

You can see Merkel’s insulting spiel here:

https://youtu.be/wEIl9GUrZ_Q

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-06/germany-shaken-by-new-year-attacks-on-women-in-cologne/7069876

Hijrah: Jihad By Emigration And The Death Of Europe

There are many places on the planet that nobody would ever willing move to, especially Westerners who grow up believing in silly old ideas like the value of human life and freedom.

Nowadays though, those places come to you.

More correctly, the people and ideologies from nations where life has little value swamp into Western nations and begin to ingrain those ideologies into their next generations, who frequently grow up hating the West far more than their parents ever could have.

At the moment, Leftists applaud as hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim refugees pour into Europe demanding the right to freely receive all of the benefits that many in the West died to achieve over a timeframe of centuries.

It’s one thing to want it but nobody gets the freedom of the West freely, especially if it is not treasured and nurtured carefully.

Simply, you cling to Islam once you’re in the West and that’s what you will get: bloody, violent, oppressive, racist, sexist Islam.

The more Muslims there are, the greater the terraforming effect will be. Then one day, the West will look pretty much like the Middle East…somewhere that no refugee would ever flee to.

Robert Spencer’s report outlines the future of Europe and it doesn’t look good:

Approximately 104,460 asylum seekers arrived in Germany during the month of August, setting a new record. That makes 413,535 registered refugees and migrants coming to Germany in 2015 so far. The country expects a total of around 800,000 people to seek asylum in Germany this year. And that’s just Germany. The entire continent of Europe is being inundated with refugees at a rate unprecedented in world history. This is no longer just a “refugee crisis.” This is a hijrah.

Hijrah, or jihad by emigration, is, according to Islamic tradition, the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE. It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers. Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.

To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act. “And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance,” says the Qur’an. “And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.” (4:100) The exalted status of such emigrants led a British jihad group that won notoriety (and a shutdown by the government) a few years ago for celebrating 9/11 to call itself Al-Muhajiroun: The Emigrants.

And now a hijrah of a much greater magnitude is upon us. Evidence that this is a hijrah, not simply a humanitarian crisis, came last February, but was little noted at the time and almost immediately forgotten. The Islamic State published a document entitled, “Libya: The Strategic Gateway for the Islamic State.” Gateway into Europe, that is: the document exhorted Muslims to go to Libya and cross from there as refugees into Europe. This document tells would-be jihadis that weapons from Gaddafi’s arsenal are plentiful and easy to obtain in Libya – and that the country “has a long coast and looks upon the southern Crusader states, which can be reached with ease by even a rudimentary boat.”

The Islamic State did not have in mind just a few jihadis crossing from Libya: it also emerged last February that the jihadis planned to flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. Now the number is shooting well beyond that in Germany alone. Of course, not all of these refugees are Islamic jihadis. Not all are even Muslims, although most are. However, no effort whatsoever is being made to determine the refugees’ adherence to Sharia and desire to bring it to their new land. Any such effort would be “Islamophobic.” Yet there are already hints that the Islamic State is putting its plan into effect: jihadis have already been found among the refugees trying to enter Europe. There will be many more such discoveries.

Eight hundred thousand Muslim refugees in one year alone. This will transform Germany, and Europe, forever, overtaxing the welfare economies of its wealthiest nations and altering the cultural landscape beyond recognition. Yet the serious public discussion that needs to be had about this crisis is shouted down by the usual nonsense: the Washington Post Wednesday published an inflammatory and irresponsible piece likening those concerned about this massive Muslim influx into Europe to 1930s Nazis ready to incinerate Jews by the millions. Hollywood star Emma Thompson accused British authorities of racism for not taking in more refugees – as if British authorities haven’t already done enough to destroy their nation.

And so it goes. If you don’t accept the brave new world that is sure to bring more jihad and more Sharia to Europe, you’re a Nazi and a racist. Meanwhile, no one is bothering even to ask, much less answer, one central question: why is it incumbent upon Europe have to absorb all these refugees? Why not Saudi Arabia or the other Muslim countries that are oil-rich and have plenty of space? The answer is unspoken because non-Muslim authorities refuse to believe it and Muslims don’t want it stated or known: these refugees have to go to Europe because this is a hijrah. 

This is also Europe’s death knell.

Despite all this, it’s important to remember that true freedom comes from Christ Jesus alone.

We don’t want to see the West die but ultimately it, and its enemies, will be replaced by God’s eternal Kingdom, to the praise and glory of Jesus Christ.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260019/hijrah-europe-robert-spencer