#AbortionSoBlack Because As Margaret Sanger Says: Blacks Are “Human Weeds”

So you’ve been tweeting #OscarsSoWhite to your hearts content and you love the great work Planned Parenthood have been illegally trading.

Whoa dude: paradoxical dilemma!

Perhaps it time you started tweeting #AbortionSoBlack because black babies seem to feature as heavily in abortion clinics as non-blacks do on Academy Award nomination lists.

Pro-abortion activists are again storming Washington D.C. as the Supreme Court hears arguments regarding a Texas law they consider too restrictive on abortion. It boggles my mind how desperately people will fight for the right to kill their own babies.

Most of the activists honestly think this is an argument about choice. They demand freedom in their reproductive lives. Hey, here’s a news flash. You already have it. But the choice is not to be made after the life is conceived, it is to be made before the reproductive act begins. But that is for another article.

To understand this crusade of death, simply look at the mother of the abortion movement, Margaret Sanger. Today’s liberal spin touts Sanger as a woman of strong convictions fighting for woman’s rights. She’s credited with educating the world on birth control and sex. I would like to continue that biography with actual facts, including her own words.

Sanger lived in Greenwich Village with her husband, William, where she rubbed elbows with New York elites like Socialist/Democrat Upton Sinclair and anarchist Emma Goldman. Sanger was a member of groups like the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party and the Liberal Club.

After finding herself in legal trouble, she fled to Europe where she had affairs with eugenics supporter Havelock Ellis and socialist H.G. Wells. While there, her progressive lovers and friends taught her how to use the compassion of family planning as a guise to persuade people to their cause. See, their objective wasn’t birth control to help the burdened family. It was to force their progressive ideology on society and wipe out those who were inferior, which was basically Blacks and other non-Whites, the physically and mentally inadequate, the physically and mentally handicap, and the poor.

Upon her return to the states, Sanger rolled up her sleeves and got right to work in pushing her doctrine of the perfect race. In a 1915 handbook targeting teenagers, she wrote, “Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence.” Does that sound like compassionate family planning or choice to you?  

In fact, she was so for a woman’s right to choose she wrote the following in “Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108):

-The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.

The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.

-Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense— defending the unborn against their own disabilities

In an article for American Weekly, Sanger provided the following insight in: “America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934. 

    Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

    Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

    Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

So who is the “unfit” in Article 1? According to Sanger, “Non-Aryan people [of the United States are] a great biological menace to the future of civilization.” Blacks she characterized as “human weeds”. In fact, this is so paramount to Sanger’s own brainchild, Planned Parenthood, that 79% of their abortion clinics target Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. If Planned Parenthood is about choice, why are they so focused on killing minorities?

In 2012, New York City aborted more Black babies than were actually born. In fact, abortions to Black mothers made up 42.4% of the babies killed while Hispanics comprised another 31%. Together 73% of New York City’s abortions were of these two minority groups alone. Congratulations Margaret Sanger and pro-choice advocates.

Articles 4 and 6 have nothing to do with choice. They are the antithesis of it. Proposing no woman has a “legal right to bear a child,” sounds more like enslavement than reproductive freedom. Demanding a “permit for parenthood” is anything but personal choice. It is a superiority dogma professed by progressive elitists who claim understanding and kindness to the very population they wish to terminate.

We all gasp at and repudiate the horrific actions of the Nazi’s against the Jews, but guess where they learned it from. Good old, Margaret Sanger and her eugenics friends right here in America. In fact, between 1907 and 1963, over 60,000 people were involuntarily sterilized in the United States under American law. Choice? I think not.

The movement of sterilization and segregation was not as popular as Sanger had hoped, especially after World War II. She had to find another way to rid the earth of the “unfit.” She had to convince the mothers to voluntarily terminate their own babies. Enter abortion.

Margaret SangerSanger was so invested in reducing, if not irradiating, the Black population, she found friends and allies in the KKK and other similar groups. She even enlisted Blacks themselves. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, an heir of Proctor and Gamble, Sanger wrote the following: 

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” 

So while you pro-choice people rally for your right to kill your offspring, know the woman who started it all did so because she thought you were stupid, unfit, diseased, inferior, and quite frankly, not good enough to reproduce. Sure, she did it under the guise of giving you the illusion of freedom in controlling how many children you have, but make no mistake, she did whatever she had to so you would proudly kill your own baby. It didn’t matter to her why you did it. She was only concerned about making sure you did do it.

There is nothing more diseased than a society that celebrates the execution of their own children. After seeing the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood selling aborted babies like a stolen car disassembled for parts, how can anyone still argue Planned Parenthood is a company worth supporting? It is morally equivalent to saying, “Nazis may have killed 6 million Jews, but they built the autobahn.” I, for one, think it is about time to abort, disassemble, and sell off Margaret Sanger’s most precious baby.  

But that’s just my 2 cents.

http://constitution.com/shocking-quotes-from-planned-parenthood-founder/

Naturalistic Evolution And Humanism: The Bloodiest Religion

Blood sacrifice is a part of most religions in some form or another because it seeks to emulate true religion that comes from God. 

It’s actually one of the easy ways to identify a false religion and the kill count of abortion stands as the biggest and longest ongoing blood sacrifice to Satan in history.

Christians are often confronted with the claim that a humanistic worldview will help society become better. Even the first Humanist Manifesto, of which belief in evolution is a subset, declared, “The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently co-operate for the common good.” But can such a statement be true?
For starters, what do the authors mean by “good”? They have no legitimate foundation for such a concept, since one person’s “good” can be another’s “evil.” To have some objective standard, they must borrow from the teachings of God in the Bible.

Beyond that, does evolution really teach a future of prosperity? What has been the result of evolutionary thinking in the past hundred years? Perhaps this could be a test of what is to come. Let’s first look at the casualties stemming from leaders with evolutionary worldviews, beginning in the 1900s, to see the hints of what this “next level” looks like:

Who/What? Specific Event and Estimated Dead

Pre-Hitler Germany/Hitler and the Nazis 

WWI: 20,000,000 dead, 21,000,000 wounded1

WWII: 72,000,0002

Holocaust: 17,000,000? (estimates range from 7 to 26 million)3
Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin Bolshevik revolution and Russian Civil War: 15,000,0004

Joseph Stalin 20,000,0005

Mao Zedong 14,000,000–20,000,0006

Pol Pot (Saloth Sar) 750,000–1,700,0007
Abortion* 

China estimates 1971–2006: 300,000,0008

Russia estimates 1954–1991: 280,000,0009

US estimates 1973–2014: 57,496,01110

France estimates 1936–2006: 5,749,73111

UK estimates 1958–2006: 6,090,73812

Germany estimates 1968–2007: 3,699,62413

Charles Darwin’s view of evolution was catapulted into societies around the world in the mid- to late 1800s. Evolutionary teachings influenced Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong, Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, and many others. Let’s take a closer look at some of these people and events and examine the evolutionary influence and repercussions.

World War I and II, Hitler, Nazis, and the Holocaust

Most historians would point to the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand on June 18, 1914, as the event that triggered World War I (WWI). But tensions were already high considering the state of Europe at the time. Darwinian sentiment was brewing in Germany. Darwin once said:

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian [Aborigine] and the gorilla.14

Darwin viewed the “Caucasian” (white-skinned Europeans) as the dominant “race” in an evolutionary worldview. To many evolutionists at the time, mankind had evolved from ape-like creatures that had more hair, dark skin, dark eyes, etc. Therefore, more “evolved” meant less body hair, blond hair, blue eyes, etc. Later in Hitler’s era, Nazi Germany practiced Lebensborn, which was a controversial program, the details of which have not been entirely brought to light. Many claim it was a breeding program that tried to evolve the “master race” further—more on this below.

But the German sentiment prior to WWI was very much bent on conquering for the purpose of expanding their territory and their “race.” An encyclopedia entry from 1936 states:

In discussions of the background of the war much has been said of Pan-Germanism, which was the spirit of national consciousness carried to the extreme limit. The Pan-Germans, who included not only militarists, but historians, scientists, educators and statesmen, conceived the German people, no matter where they located, as permanently retaining their nationality. The most ambitious of this group believed that it was their mission of Germans to extend their kultur (culture) over the world, and to accomplish this by conquest if necessary. In this connection the theory was advanced that the German was a superior being, destined to dominate other peoples, most of whom were thought of as decadent.15

Germany had been buying into an extreme view of Darwin’s model of evolution and saw themselves as the superior “race,” destined to dominate the world. This view set the stage for Hitler and the Nazi party and paved the road to WWII.

Hitler

World War II dwarfed World War I in the total number of people who died. Racist attitudes exploded in Germany against people groups such as Jews, Poles, and many others. Adolf Hitler was heavily influenced by Darwin’s teaching on evolution.

Hitler even tried to force the Protestant church in Germany to change fundamental tenants because of his newfound faith.16 In 1936, while Hitler was in power, an encyclopedia entry on Hitler stated:

. . . a Hitler attempt to modify the Protestant faith failed.17

His actions strongly suggest that he did not hold to the basic fundamentals taught in the 66 books of the Bible. Though some of his writings suggest he did believe in some form of God early on, his religious views moved toward humanism after his acceptance of evolution. This refutes notions that Hitler was a Protestant Christian as some have claimed. Consider this quote in his unpublished second book:

The types of creatures on the earth are countless, and on an individual level their self-preservation instinct as well as the longing for procreation is always unlimited; however, the space in which this entire life process plays itself out is limited. It is the surface area of a precisely measured sphere on which billions and billions of individual beings struggle for life and succession. In the limitation of this living space lies the compulsion for the struggle for survival, and the struggle for survival, in turn contains the precondition for evolution.18

Hitler continues:

The history of the world in the ages when humans did not yet exist was initially a representation of geological occurrences. The clash of natural forces with each other, the formation of a habitable surface on this planet, the separation of water and land, the formation of the mountains, plains, and the seas. That [was] is the history of the world during this time. Later, with the emergence of organic life, human interest focuses on the appearance and disappearance of its thousandfold forms. Man himself finally becomes visible very late, and from that point on he begins to understand the term “world history” as referring to the history of his own development—in other words, the representation of his own evolution. This development is characterized by the never-ending battle of humans against animals and also against humans themselves.19

Hitler fully believed Darwin as well as Darwin’s precursors—such as Charles Lyell’s geological ages and millions of years of history. In his statements here, there is no reference to God. Instead, he unreservedly flew the banner of naturalism and evolution. His evolutionary views certainly helped lead him and the Nazi party into WWII because they viewed the “Caucasian” as more evolved, which to them justified their adoption of the idea that lesser “races” would be eliminated in the struggle for survival. Among the first to be targeted were Jews, then Poles, and then many others.

Trotsky, Lenin

Trotsky and Lenin were both notorious leaders of the USSR—and specifically the Russian revolution. Lenin, taking power in 1917, became a ruthless leader and selected Trotsky as his heir. Lenin and Trotsky held to Marxism, which was built on Darwinism and evolution. Karl Marx regarded Darwin’s book as an “epoch making book.” With regards to Darwin’s research on natural origins, Marx claimed, “The latter method is the only materialistic and, therefore, the only scientific one.”20

Few realize or admit that Marxism, the primary idea underlying communism, is built on Darwinism. In 1883, Freidrich Engels, Marx’s longtime friend and collaborator, stated at Marx’s funeral service that “Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history.”21 Both Darwin and Marx built their ideologies on naturalism and materialism.

Trotsky once said of Darwin:

Darwin stood for me like a mighty doorkeeper at the entrance to the temple of the universe. I was intoxicated with his minute, precise, conscientious and at the same time powerful, thought. I was the more astonished when I read . . . that he had preserved his belief in God. I absolutely declined to understand how a theory of the origin of species by way of natural selection and sexual selection and a belief in God could find room in one and the same head.22

Trotsky’s high regard for evolution and Darwin were the foundation of his belief system. Like many, Trotsky probably did not realize that most of the precious few instances of the name “God” did not appear in the first edition of Origin of Species. These references were added later, and many suspect that this was done to influence church members to adopt Darwinism. Regardless, Trotsky may not have read much of Darwin’s second book, Descent of Man, in which Darwin claims that man invented God:

The same high mental faculties which first led man to believe in unseen spiritual agencies, then in fetishism, polytheism, and ultimately in monotheism, would infallibly lead him, as long as his reasoning powers remained poorly developed, to various strange superstitions and customs.23

Vladimir Lenin picked up on Darwinism and Marxism and ruled very harshly as an evolutionist. His variants of Marxism have become known as Leninism (see The Development of Capitalism in Russia). Regardless, the evolutionist roots of Marx, Trotsky, and Lenin were the foundation that Communism has stood on—and continues to stand on.

Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, to name a few

Perhaps the most ruthless communist leaders were Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Each of these were social Darwinists, ruling three different countries—the Soviet Union, China, and Cambodia respectively. Their reigns of terror demonstrated the end result of reducing the value of human life to that of mere animals, a Darwinistic teaching.24

Abortion

The war on children has been one of the quietest and yet bloodiest in the past hundred years. In an evolutionary mindset, the unborn have been treated as though they are going through an “animal phase” and can simply be discarded.

Haeckel’s Embryo Drawing

Early evolutionist Ernst Haeckel first popularized the concept that babies in the womb are actually undergoing animal developmental stages, such as a fish stage and so on. This idea has come to be known as ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. Haeckel even faked drawings of various animals’ embryos and had them next to drawn human embryos looking virtually identical.

These drawings have been shown to be completely false.25 Haeckel himself partially confessed as much.26 However, this discredited idea has been used repeatedly for a hundred years! Textbooks today still use this concept, and museums around the world still teach it.

Through this deception, many women have been convinced that the babies they are carrying in their wombs are simply going through an animal phase and can be aborted. Author Ken Ham states:

In fact, some abortion clinics in America have taken women aside to explain to them that what is being aborted is just an embryo in the fish stage of evolution, and that the embryo must not be thought of as human. These women are being fed outright lies.27

Evolutionary views have decreased the value of human life. Throughout the world the casualties of the war on children is staggering. Though deaths of children and the unborn did exist prior to the “evolution revolution,” they have increased exponentially as a result of Darwinian teachings.

Conclusion

Is evolution the cause of wars and deaths? Absolutely not—both existed long before Darwin was born. Sin is the ultimate cause.28 But an evolutionary worldview has done nothing but add fuel to the fire.

In spite of the wars and atrocities caused by those who subscribed to an evolutionary worldview in recent times, there is still hope. We can end the seemingly endless atrocities against the unborn.

In Egypt, Israelite boys were slaughtered by being thrown into the Nile at the command of Pharaoh (Exodus 1:20). And yet, by the providence of God, Moses survived and led the Israelites to safety, and the Lord later judged the Egyptians.

In Israel under the Roman Empire, Herod the Great commanded the slaughter of all the boys under the age of two in and around Bethlehem. And yet, by the providence of God, Jesus, the Son of God, survived and later laid down His life to bring salvation to mankind as the Prince of Peace. Herod’s name, however, went down in history as an evil tyrant and murderer.

In this day and age, governments readily permit the killing of children, both boys and girls, and sometimes command it (abortion). By providence, however, you survived. While we can’t change the past, we can learn from it. If we are to stop this continuing bloodshed, we must get back to the Bible and realize the bankrupt religion of evolution has led only to death—by the millions.
Footnotes

World War I Casualties, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties, October 23, 2008, as with all of these statistics, they may have some variance depending on source.

World War II Casualties, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties, October 23, 2008.

The Holocaust, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust, October 23, 2008.

Russian Civil War, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Civil_War, October 23, 2008.

Joseph Stalin, http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/stalin.html, October 23, 2008.

Mao Tse-Tung, http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/mao.html, October 23, 2008.

Pol Pot, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_Pot, October 23, 2008.

Historical abortion statistics, PR China, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston , last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-prchina.html.

Historical abortion statistics, U.S.S.R., compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston , last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-ussr.html

“Abortion Statistics: United States Data & Trends,” National Right to Life, http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS01AbortionintheUS.pdf.

Historical abortion statistics, France, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston, last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-france.html.

Historical abortion statistics, United Kingdom, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston, last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-unitedkingdom.html

Historical abortion statistics, FR Germany, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston, last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-frgermany.html

Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man (New York: A.L. Burt, 1874, 2nd ed.), p. 178.

The American Educator Encyclopedia, The United Educators, Inc., Chicago, 1936, p. 3914 under entry “World War.”

The American Educator Encyclopedia, The United Educators, Inc., Chicago, 1936, p. 1702 under entry “Hitler.”

The American Educator Encyclopedia, The United Educators, Inc., Chicago, 1936, p. 1494 under entry “Germany.”

Hitler’s Second Book, Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gerald L. Weinberg, 2003 Enigma books, Translated by Krista Smith, p. 8.

Hitler’s Second Book, Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gerald L. Weinberg, 2003 Enigma books, Translated by Krista Smith, p. 9.

Great Books of the Western World, Volume 50, Capital, Karl Marx, William Benton (Publishers), Chicago, 1952, Footnotes on p. 166 and p. 181

Gertrude Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, London,: Chatto & Windus, 1959, p. 348.

Eastman, Max, Trotsky: A portrait of his youth, New York, pp. 117-118, 1925.

Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Chapter III (Mental Powers of Man and the Lower Animals), 1871, As printed in the Great Books of the Western World, Volume 49, Robert Hutchins, Ed., Chicago, 1952, p. 303.

Raymond Hall, Darwin’s Impact—The Bloodstained Legacy of Evolution.

Michael Richardson et al, Anatomy and Embryology, 196(2):91-106, 1997.

Haeckel said, “ . . . a small portion of my embryo-pictures (possibly 6 or 8 in a hundred) are really (in Dr Brass’s [one of his critics] sense of the word) “falsified”—all those, namely, in which the disclosed material for inspection is so incomplete or insufficient that one is compelled in a restoration of a connected development series to fill up the gaps through hypotheses, and to reconstruct the missing members through comparative syntheses. What difficulties this task encounters, and how easily the draughts- man may blunder in it, the embryologist alone can judge.” The Truth about Haeckel’s Confession, The Bible Investigator and Inquirer, M.L. Hutchinson, Melbourne, March 11, 1911, p. 22–24.

Ham, Ken, The Lie: Evolution, Chapter 8 (The Evils of Evolution), Master Books, Green Forest, AK, 1987, p. 105.

The New Answers Book 1, Gen. Ed. Ken Ham, Master Books, Green Forest, Arkansas, 2006, Chapter 26: Why Does God’s Creation Include Death and Suffering?, pp.325–338.

https://answersingenesis.org/sanctity-of-life/the-results-of-evolution/

Germany Was Groomed For The Holocaust By Evolution And Social Darwinism

Many in the West argue that murdering children through abortion is “a woman’s right”. Ask school aged children and you will find a large proportion are totally accepting of this excuse and some will admantly defend this heinous crime as morally sound.

Our society did not always believe this and so we need to understand how it is that we have come to willingly participate in the murder of approximately one fifth of the entire living human race  in the last century (yes, about one and a half billion people dead!)

Likewise, we should understand that Germany didn’t up and decide to gas millions of Jews and other undesirables on a whim – they were prepared by a century of philosophical indoctrination.

The doctrine in question is Darwinian evolution – the unproven idea that all life came from one form of life – and it’s logical social implication was that not all animals are equal: namely, white animals are superior.

This led the German nation under the leadership of avid naturalist Adolf Hitler down the road of eugenics – the improvement of humanity and the removal of the undesirable – which involved the murder of children, the disabled, and anyone who didn’t make the classification of “superior”, including but not limited to the Jews.

So while Martin Luther and others had given the Germans religious reasoning to dislike the Jews (through a false understanding of the bible – keep in mind Jesus is a Jew and therefore not so big on promoting anitsemetism), it was naturalism, evolution, social Darwinism, and eugenics that offered “scientific” reasoning for the extermination of the “sub-human” Jews.

The recent video from Creation Ministries International explores this process and its consequences:

The Death Knell Of Planned Parenthood? Sure Hope So!

Planned Parenthood was always a disgusting and despicable organisation.

Now, a few more people know about it. Naturally, the pro-murder mainstream media are squirming as they try to avoid covering this horrific news and it’s nice to know, especially since they devote most of their resources to cultural subversion and general lies.

Apparently the story is just gaining momentum though and Bill Muehlenberg’s recent article The Ongoing Implosion of Planned Parenthood makes some powerful commentary on this matter:

Call it what you will, Planned Barrenhood or Banned Parenthood, the last few weeks have been a bit rough for the world’s largest baby killing organisation. Indeed, this is a story that keeps on giving. The group that videoed the diabolical dealings of PP, the Center for Medical Progress, have now released a second – and equally damning – video.
It keeps getting worse and worse. The new video shows a senior PP official haggling over the prices of fetal body parts. Toward the end of the 8-minute video, she even jokes about how she “wants a Lamborghini.” Well, those baby body parts do add up I guess. See it all here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjCs_gvImyw

There is no question that PP is right up there with the Nazis. This is a group that has a long history of demonic activities. Just recently they have been caught out on a number of gruesome deeds:

-covering up sexual abuse of minors

-aiding and abetting sex traffickers

-double-billing taxpayers

-and of course the cold-hearted murder of millions of innocent babies

Well, given that PP was founded by the arch-eugenicist Margaret Sanger, what do we expect? You remember her, with such memorable quotes as:

“The handicapped, including the blind, deaf, dumb, mute and epileptics, are the dead weight of human waste.”

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.”

“The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order,”

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Nice, real nice. Her callous, heartless and diabolical views were the very basis of PP, and they continue in the same exact mindset today. So why are we surprised at these new revelations? This is simply PP at work. This is what it does for a living. This is its very purpose and function.

But all these new revelations are catching them out big time. If what they deal with (around 350,000 a year in the US alone) are merely clumps of cells one minute, how can they be human body parts (brains, livers, arms, legs, etc) the next minute? When it comes to making money, the misuse and abuse of the English language will do nicely thanks.

Yet in the US they also receive over a half billion dollars a year in taxpayer funding. And on top of that there is plenty of corporate sponsorship as well for these killers. In the US there are 41 corporations and organisations that directly contribute to PP.

This is not only a very well-oiled and efficient killing machine, it is a very lucrative one as well. Indeed, the average salary for a PP regional CEO is just a tad short of $200,000 per year. Killing babies is obviously a lot more profitable than teaching in a school or flipping burgers.

While PP is doing all the sorts of stuff that would make the Nazis proud (and they did learn a lot from Sanger and Co.), one of the more incredible things (but not unexpected) is how the mainstream media has been doing its best to ignore this story.

This is clearly one of the most important stories of the year, yet the lamestream media is doing all it can to avoid it. It is only because the alternative media has made so much of it that they have reluctantly been getting into the act. Mollie Hemingway has just done a piece documenting this despicable dereliction of duty. Compare the beat-up about the Confederate Flag to the PP story:

-The New York Times has run stories and essays on the Confederate flag 149 times since June 17 (and only 39 of those mention Roof), 41 of those in the first six days. That compares to three stories on Planned Parenthood during the same window, just 7 percent of what you’d expect if the New York Times considered those stories merely of equal importance.

-CNN has had 493 mentions of the Confederate flag since June 17 (only 188 of these even mention alleged church shooter Dylann Roof), and managed 167 in the first six days. In the first six days of the Planned Parenthood scandal, they managed 7 mentions, less than 5 percent what you’d expect if you considered those stories only of equal importance.

She mentions other major news outlets, then offers “a few stories that I might have reporters look into” if the MSM is having troubles trying to unearth a story. Here are just some of them:

-We’ve heard about serial murderer/abortionist Kermit Gosnell keeping trophies of his victims, abortion clinics dumping babies in the trash, and now Deborah Nucatola working to do “a little better than break even” in the sales of intact baby organs. What’s the standard procedure for disposal of the unborn children killed in abortion? Are there abortion clinic standards for this? Does it vary state by state? Do states even have regulations? Does Planned Parenthood have uniform regulations? If not, why not? If so, how are they enforced?

-How much money does Planned Parenthood receive via sales of baby organs? Do they keep records? Are those records trustworthy? How do we know? How significant are these funds to the abortion portion of Planned Parenthood’s operation? How does compensation for the children’s lungs, livers, hearts and brains vary by state, if they do vary?

-How far along in a pregnancy must a woman be for her child’s organs to be considered worthwhile for procurement, sale and transfer? How much does the value of a child’s liver, heart, lungs, etc., increase with time? Do the sales of baby organs form a significant enough part of Planned Parenthood’s business model to result in, say, filibustering of protections for late-term unborn children?

-What are the laws on trafficking in human body parts? Who wrote those laws? Was the abortion industry involved in writing those laws?

-How much money is made throughout the organ sale process? How do corporations make their way around laws prohibiting the express sale of human organs? What do ethicists say about these loopholes and workarounds?

-Could expert observers take us through Planned Parenthood’s various responses to the charges levied in the video? They don’t deny the charges. How is that significant?

Good questions indeed. If the MSM were really objective, unbiased, and neutral, they would be all over this story like a rash. But they are not. The overwhelming majority of those in the MSM are secular lefties who fully support abortion on demand. So of course they don’t want to cover this story.

They only want to go after Christians and conservatives. They sure don’t want to go after their own. That is why it is so absolutely essential that the alternative media exists. It is doing the job the MSM refuses to do. And I will also keep hammering away at stories like these.

Pro-life activist Lila Rose had this to say about the new video:

This latest video further illustrates the barbaric reality of business at Planned Parenthood – that after selling an abortion, Planned Parenthood works to improve their bottom line by harvesting the body parts of the child they have just killed. What has our nation come to that we allow the brutality of abortion upon our children, and then sell their broken bodies for profit, all the while, funding the perpetrator? While millions of Americans, on both sides of the political aisle, are expressing their horror at Planned Parenthood’s trafficking of preborn children’s bodies — their tiny lungs, hearts and livers — our taxpayer dollars continue to flow into the organization at the rate of over $500 million per year. Human rights are bipartisan — where is the outcry from presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and others over sale of the parts of children? Silence in the face of such atrocity is complicity.

Exactly. Just as there was damnable silence from far too many Germans when the Nazis were freely doing their thing, and the concentration camps were filling up, so too we have way too much silence today. And it is not just the MSM who are abdicating their responsibilities here.

Most churches and Christian leaders are not saying a word about any of this. They don’t want to rock the boat, upset their congregations, and lose out on the weekly offering. They have blood on their hands. Their unwillingness to stand up for “the least of these” as Jesus put it will not go unnoticed come judgment day.

At the very least, all government funding of PP should stop immediately. We already have several Congressional investigations and at least seven US state investigations going on over this horrific activity. I hope many more such investigations take place, and I hope all the gory details get out far and wide.

And I hope that as a result of all this, PP closes its deadly doors, for good. If we all celebrated the closing of the doors of the death camps in Germany 70 years ago, we should be looking forward to the same here.

Indeed, it’s amazing that this company continues to exist at all but we can be sure that like the Third Reich, it’s days are numbered and that’s a wonderful thing.

“The house of the wicked will be destroyed, but the tent of the upright will flourish.” ‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭14:11‬ ‭ESV‬‬
http://billmuehlenberg.com/2015/07/22/the-ongoing-implosion-of-planned-parenthood/

Deborah Nucatola, Adolf Eichmann, And The Banality Of Murder

Planned Parenthood makes the Third Reich’s journey in eugenics look like child’s play and after this recent bout of PP being caught selling cut up children, the obvious parallels are becoming clear even for people who maintain that murdering children is totally okay.

You can catch Deborah Nucatola’s sales pitch below:

The following article Planned Parenthood, Adolf Eichmann and the Banality of Evil by Wallace Henley gives us a disturbing look into the mind of the kinds of people who murder people and how an entire society can simply wander along with them on that genocidal journey:

Deborah Nucatola, the Planned Parenthood doctor caught on video chatting about the harvesting and sale of infant body parts over a bulbous glass of wine, brings to mind Adolf Eichmann’s manner as he was on trial in Jerusalem in 1963 for being a major henchman in Hitler’s Holocaust.
Hannah Arendt, a Jewish philosopher and writer who was able to get out of Germany before the worst of Hitler and the Nazis fell upon her people, covered the trial for The New Yorker. Later she wrote a book, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.

Arendt was struck by Eichmann’s nonchalance on the stand and in court. She thought of the word, “banal,” meaning hum-drum, ordinary, as one would feel about performing trivial activities, like filing papers, sweeping a floor, counting sheep, or nailing nails.

Eichmann helped lead the killing of at least 11 million people in the concentration camps. Yet he was simply doing his job, he protested, much as he did before the war as a traveling salesman, or during his post-war period in Argentina when he became manager of a rabbit farm, and later a welder in a Mercedes-Benz plant.

It was in the midst of the most banal of activities — going through the routine of catching a bus — that Israeli Mossad agents caught him and brought him to Jerusalem.

Nucatola was captured on video in a Los Angeles restaurant. “A lot of people” want livers of unborn babies, she said as she sipped and munched. She could only say “Wow!” when she had discovered how great is the demand for pre-born infants’ hearts. Nucatola was as casual in her description of the most efficient removal of heads and other organs from the human in the womb as Eichmann might have been tallying up the number of cattle cars to transport Jews and other non-Aryans to Auschwitz.

Critics protest when people in the pro-life movement call abortion on the scale performed by Planned Parenthood a new “holocaust” — that of the unborn human beings. But, try as it may — and Planned Parenthood spokespersons have done their best — this time, through one of its own, the huge, well-funded, abortion provider cannot hide.

Any more than Eichmann could hide in South America.

Jesus said that “all that is secret will eventually be brought into the open” (Luke 8:17). “God will bring our darkest secrets to light, and will reveal our private motives,” says the Bible, in 1 Corinthians 4:5 (NLT).

That goes for all of us, not just a doctor in an abortion organization.

Arendt was struck by Eichmann’s “stock phrases and self-invented clichés” that were part of the in-house technical parlance that disguised the reality of the Nazis’ deeds. So the people Nucatola presided over as they performed the slicing of babies are “providers,” and the material extracted “tissues.” In making sure the product is intact, “one must be cognizant of where you put your graspers.”

The remnant of civilized people left in the propagandized culture of our day have to wonder how a person can sit in a chic restaurant and talk in a banal fashion of the hacking of a human infant yet in the “sanctuary” of the womb.

In Eichmann’s case, Israeli court psychiatrists had examined him and found him a “completely normal man,” Arendt reported. The implication, she said, was that “the coexistence of normality and bottomless cruelty explodes our ordinary conceptions.”

Nucatola’s hackneyed chitter-chatter was such an explosion. The aura of the normality of removing a complete body part from a living human being blasts at the foundations of sanity.

Arendt reflected on what could produce an Eichmann and masses of people who thought and behaved as he did.

“The aim of totalitarian education has never been to instill convictions but to destroy the capacity to form any,” she said.

Nucatola is a product of schools that helped students clarify values until they have no values, education systems that have excluded study of the transcendent truth to which all are accountable, and academies that level and teach the equivalency of all phenomena.

This is the scholastic world that has given us, for example, Princeton ethics (!) professor Peter Singer who advances the idea that “the life of a newborn (human) is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee.”

Oh, the banality of it all.

“The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him,” wrote Hannah Arendt. They “were neither perverted nor sadistic,” just “terribly and terrifyingly normal.”

That, perhaps, is what is so frightening about Deborah Nucatola. She is the poster child for the new normal of the culture the elites have foisted on America. “Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda.”

So Hollywood, the progressive academy, the mainstream media, the corrupted pulpit and other propaganda machines will continue to crank out the banalities that will influence that portion of the mass demographic that still elects to office leaders of any and all parties who will contrive the policies that certify the abnormal as normal and the criminal as legal.

Another Bible passage comes to mind: “The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron” (1 Timothy 4:1-2 NIV).

The only way one can banally banter over lunch about mutilating a human being is through a seared conscience. A society that continues not to be appalled at such activity suffers from a collective seared conscience.

Deborah Nucatola shows these are indeed “later times.”

It’s a terrifying read in many ways and one that is very necessary for all Christians.

We truly are at the latter end of this age and still we will see even worse happen before Jesus returns. We need to be ready and firmly grounded in his love so that the shocking evil to come does not steal away our hope.

“Therefore, having this ministry by the mercy of God, we do not lose heart. But we have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways. We refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God’s word, but by the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God. And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. But we have this treasure in jars of clay, to show that the surpassing power belongs to God and not to us. We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed; always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be manifested in our bodies. For we who live are always being given over to death for Jesus’ sake, so that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh. So death is at work in us, but life in you. Since we have the same spirit of faith according to what has been written, “I believed, and so I spoke,” we also believe, and so we also speak, knowing that he who raised the Lord Jesus will raise us also with Jesus and bring us with you into his presence. For it is all for your sake, so that as grace extends to more and more people it may increase thanksgiving, to the glory of God. So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison, as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.” ‭‭2 Corinthians‬ ‭4:1-18‬ ‭ESV‬‬
http://www.christianpost.com/news/planned-parenthood-adolf-eichmann-and-the-banality-of-evil-141594/