STD Awareness Month: Because Catching Sexual Diseases Is Actually Heroism And Not The Expected Consequence Of Dangerous And Immoral Choices

If it is dangerous or immoral, you will find the Left defending it under its “perpetual victim” status or outright forcing it down your throat.

Abortion is one good example: murdering your own child is “freedom”. Disagree and you are a partriarchal, mysoginistic sexist. 

Homosexuality is another: take “pride” in your perverse sexual practise, especially when you parade it on a float in front of children. Disagree and you are an intolerant, bigoted religious fundamentalist who is obsessed with controlling other people’s sexuality.

But these two abominations are simply the sad and sorry extension of bad old sexual promiscuity: absolutely zero sexual restraint is “freedom”. Disagree and you are a racist, bigoted, Islamophobic, mysoginistic, intolerant…whatever.

Currently, reported cases of STD’s are off the charts in the West, especially amongst youth, which isn’t so strange in that the sexual revolutionaries have been working for near a century to encourage young people into dangerous and immoral sexual choices.

First they represented them as victims. Sure, they lived dangerously and paid the price for it in their own bodies but victim narratives sound way better when you shift all the blame away to…well anyone will do.

But victim status only gets you an audience and a means to power – then you need to reach for it. That’s why you need to turn it into a positive. Something to be honoured and shared…which is sort of how this problem got started in the first place.

Were you aware that April is “STD Awareness Month”?
Neither was I.

STD, of course, stands for “Sexually Transmitted Disease” – also known as venereal disease or STI (“Sexually Transmitted Infection”).

Seems to me that with the virally disproportionate spread of STDs among practitioners of sodomy, it would make more sense to “raise awareness” about the natural consequences of sexual promiscuity during June, which President Obama regularly dubs “LGBT Pride Month.”

Nonetheless, and speaking of pride and promiscuity, you oughta head on over to Twitter and check out the left’s latest do-nothing hashtag: #ShoutYourStatus (meaning, sexual disease). You can thank me later.

While there, you will be treated to a stupefying spread of disbelief-suspension, rationalization and justification relative to how, and why, people contract these nasty bedroom bugs in the first place.

#ShoutYourStatus is evidently the similarly twisted sister of Planned Parenthood’s profligate #ShoutYourAbortion campaign. Therein, mostly “progressive” feminists joined together to brag on social media of having their own sons and daughters dismembered alive, and then parted out for profit, or tossed in the back-alley dumpster like so much trash – all so they could avoid paying the piper and keep on truckin’ loosey-goosey.

And now, like abortion, to these same “social justice” warriors, infecting themselves and others with herpes, AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis and the like, isn’t just OK. It’s a personal accomplishment.

What I am now doing, that is, speaking bluntly and truthfully about things of which our leftist friends prefer to deny, is labeled “slut shaming” by these self-deluded proponents of Consequence-Free-Sex™ (something that does not exist).

prudishKeep in mind that I would never use the word “slut” to describe one of God’s priceless feminine creatures. It has, instead, become en vogue among our younger feminist set, to loudly and proudly acknowledge themselves as such in order to “destigmatize” the slang term’s referent sexual promiscuity, along with said behavior’s entirely foreseeable outcome (i.e., any or all form of a wide variety of potential crotch cooties).

Political correctness is an STD.

For instance, feminist blogger Ella Dawson (@brosandprose), “shouted her status” by tweeting: “I’m not interested in playing identity politics. I’m a slut, and I have herpes. I am still a person who deserves respect.”

To Ms. Dawson, I would respond that no one “deserves” respect. Each one of us deserves, based upon our own merit, nothing short of eternal damnation. Respect is something earned, and eternal salvation, something freely given. As a daughter of God, created in His own image and likeness, she does, however, deserve to be treated respectfully – and with love and kindness.

And truth.

Still, I wonder if Ms. Dawson has considered that the first aspect of her admission, “I’m a slut,” may at least be tangentially related to the second: “I have herpes.”

Alas, it appears no. As evidenced by a subsequent tweet, the causal connection between actions and consequences yet eludes our young friend’s tenuous grasp: “A few weeks ago, I told a cute guy at a bar that I had herpes. Then I slept with him. Hehehehe.”

Yikes, I wonder if Mr. Cute Guy knows that, much like John Kasich, herpes never goes away.

Anyhow, Ms. Dawson happily tweeted on: “An STD is not a reflection of your character or a consequence of poor choices. It’s an inevitability.”

Right.

Well, I guess it is inevitable to the same extent that when one gapes directly down the barrel of a loaded Glock .45 and pulls the trigger, one inevitably divests one’s cranium of a significant share of its hitherto undisturbed gray matter.

Speaking of disturbed gray matter (and diminished quantities thereof), Ella Dawson is not alone in adopting this false, morally relative, actions-without-consequences view of the world.

This mindset is progressivism personified.

Next up? #ShoutYoureNotTetheredToReality.

I decided to weigh in. “STIs are the natural consequence of sin,” I tweeted. “God’s perfect abstinence until man-wife marriage plan prevents 100% of STIs.”

“Dr. P,” with the Twitter handle, @Cataracthealer (evidently an actual M.D.), quickly rejoined, “Many people don’t want to be married, but also don’t want to be celibate.”

To which I responded, “Correct. Which is disobedience to God (aka, sin). ‘The wages of sin is death.’ Hence, herpes, AIDS, etc.”

Obama CelebratesHe then asked, legitimately, I might add, “How about the non-sinners who get the diseases from the sinners? For Example: Ryan White or faithful wife of whoring hubby, etc.?”

Putting aside for a moment that there is no such thing as a “non-sinner,” I nonetheless replied, “Indeed, horrible situations each, wherein one party is victimized by the sins of another. Yet sin remains the root cause.”

Indeed, I would be remiss if I did not concede that, while a significant minority such instances may represent, there are times when, via drug transfusion or due to a wayward spouse, innocent people can, and do, become infected with STDs through no fault of their own.

Still, the vast majority of infections occur as the natural outcome of bad choices – of sin.

Choices like those made by “BadGrrrlMeat” (@lachristagreco), who, like Ms. Dawson, boasted of having contracted herpes. She responded to my original tweet with, “Sinning is the best. I’m a proud sinner!”

Which immediately reminded me of Philippians 3:10: “Their end is destruction, their god is their belly, and they glory in their shame, with minds set on earthly things.”

Oh, how the Word of God is Truth.

“Don’t get me wrong,” I closed. “I’m not judging. I’m a sinner as bad as any other. Yet truth is truth. Truth, who is Christ, saved me.”

And I pray that Truth might save “ELD” (@eld3393), who asked the Twittersphere, “I kicked off #STIAwarenessMonth by sharing my herpes+ story w/ 7th grade human sexuality classes. How are you celebrating?”

Celebrating herpes? Seventh graders?

#ShoutYourStatus, world!

The world celebrates sin.

The world needs saving.

Advertisements

#AbortionSoBlack Because As Margaret Sanger Says: Blacks Are “Human Weeds”

So you’ve been tweeting #OscarsSoWhite to your hearts content and you love the great work Planned Parenthood have been illegally trading.

Whoa dude: paradoxical dilemma!

Perhaps it time you started tweeting #AbortionSoBlack because black babies seem to feature as heavily in abortion clinics as non-blacks do on Academy Award nomination lists.

Pro-abortion activists are again storming Washington D.C. as the Supreme Court hears arguments regarding a Texas law they consider too restrictive on abortion. It boggles my mind how desperately people will fight for the right to kill their own babies.

Most of the activists honestly think this is an argument about choice. They demand freedom in their reproductive lives. Hey, here’s a news flash. You already have it. But the choice is not to be made after the life is conceived, it is to be made before the reproductive act begins. But that is for another article.

To understand this crusade of death, simply look at the mother of the abortion movement, Margaret Sanger. Today’s liberal spin touts Sanger as a woman of strong convictions fighting for woman’s rights. She’s credited with educating the world on birth control and sex. I would like to continue that biography with actual facts, including her own words.

Sanger lived in Greenwich Village with her husband, William, where she rubbed elbows with New York elites like Socialist/Democrat Upton Sinclair and anarchist Emma Goldman. Sanger was a member of groups like the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party and the Liberal Club.

After finding herself in legal trouble, she fled to Europe where she had affairs with eugenics supporter Havelock Ellis and socialist H.G. Wells. While there, her progressive lovers and friends taught her how to use the compassion of family planning as a guise to persuade people to their cause. See, their objective wasn’t birth control to help the burdened family. It was to force their progressive ideology on society and wipe out those who were inferior, which was basically Blacks and other non-Whites, the physically and mentally inadequate, the physically and mentally handicap, and the poor.

Upon her return to the states, Sanger rolled up her sleeves and got right to work in pushing her doctrine of the perfect race. In a 1915 handbook targeting teenagers, she wrote, “Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence.” Does that sound like compassionate family planning or choice to you?  

In fact, she was so for a woman’s right to choose she wrote the following in “Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108):

-The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.

The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.

-Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense— defending the unborn against their own disabilities

In an article for American Weekly, Sanger provided the following insight in: “America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934. 

    Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

    Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

    Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

So who is the “unfit” in Article 1? According to Sanger, “Non-Aryan people [of the United States are] a great biological menace to the future of civilization.” Blacks she characterized as “human weeds”. In fact, this is so paramount to Sanger’s own brainchild, Planned Parenthood, that 79% of their abortion clinics target Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. If Planned Parenthood is about choice, why are they so focused on killing minorities?

In 2012, New York City aborted more Black babies than were actually born. In fact, abortions to Black mothers made up 42.4% of the babies killed while Hispanics comprised another 31%. Together 73% of New York City’s abortions were of these two minority groups alone. Congratulations Margaret Sanger and pro-choice advocates.

Articles 4 and 6 have nothing to do with choice. They are the antithesis of it. Proposing no woman has a “legal right to bear a child,” sounds more like enslavement than reproductive freedom. Demanding a “permit for parenthood” is anything but personal choice. It is a superiority dogma professed by progressive elitists who claim understanding and kindness to the very population they wish to terminate.

We all gasp at and repudiate the horrific actions of the Nazi’s against the Jews, but guess where they learned it from. Good old, Margaret Sanger and her eugenics friends right here in America. In fact, between 1907 and 1963, over 60,000 people were involuntarily sterilized in the United States under American law. Choice? I think not.

The movement of sterilization and segregation was not as popular as Sanger had hoped, especially after World War II. She had to find another way to rid the earth of the “unfit.” She had to convince the mothers to voluntarily terminate their own babies. Enter abortion.

Margaret SangerSanger was so invested in reducing, if not irradiating, the Black population, she found friends and allies in the KKK and other similar groups. She even enlisted Blacks themselves. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, an heir of Proctor and Gamble, Sanger wrote the following: 

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” 

So while you pro-choice people rally for your right to kill your offspring, know the woman who started it all did so because she thought you were stupid, unfit, diseased, inferior, and quite frankly, not good enough to reproduce. Sure, she did it under the guise of giving you the illusion of freedom in controlling how many children you have, but make no mistake, she did whatever she had to so you would proudly kill your own baby. It didn’t matter to her why you did it. She was only concerned about making sure you did do it.

There is nothing more diseased than a society that celebrates the execution of their own children. After seeing the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood selling aborted babies like a stolen car disassembled for parts, how can anyone still argue Planned Parenthood is a company worth supporting? It is morally equivalent to saying, “Nazis may have killed 6 million Jews, but they built the autobahn.” I, for one, think it is about time to abort, disassemble, and sell off Margaret Sanger’s most precious baby.  

But that’s just my 2 cents.

http://constitution.com/shocking-quotes-from-planned-parenthood-founder/

Investigators Who Exposed Planned Parenthood’s Illegal Baby Organ Trade Face 20 Years In Prison, Planned Parenthood Escapes Justice

Bill Muehlenberg exposes the hypocrisy of the New West:

When the rule of law and the criminal justice system is broken, and broken badly, then no country can last for long. That is exactly what we find occurring in the United States with the recent shock announcement that charges would be laid – not against the baby killing and baby parts selling Goliath but the David who caught them out. This is what has just happened:

The lead investigator behind the undercover Planned Parenthood videos faces up to 20 years in prison after a Houston grand jury decided on Monday not to charge Planned Parenthood with any wrongdoing – and instead indicted him for offering to purchase human organs from the abortion provider.

Center for Medical Progress lead investigator David Daleiden faces a second-degree felony charge of “tampering with a governmental record,” and a misdemeanor charge for violating the state’s “prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs.” That is, jurors in the state of Texas are accusing David Daleiden of trying to illegally traffic in aborted babies’ body parts.

I of course wrote plenty of articles on this when the explosive videos appeared last year, and highlighted the tremendous work of Daleiden and his team in showing the world the shocking truth about what Planned Parenthood really does for a living. My first article on this is found here: billmuehlenberg.com/2015/07/15/planned-parenthoods-deadly-baby-trade/

Daleiden 4For this amazing undercover work in exposing the diabolical activities of the world’s largest baby killing machine, Daleiden and Co deserve a medal and are worthy of the highest honours. Instead we find a corrupt and poisoned criminal justice system in the US which is actually making Daleiden the bad guy here. This is shocking beyond belief.

But any nation that can legally sanction and justify the murder of nearly one and a half million innocent babies a year has long ago ceased to be morally licit. So I guess we should not be surprised by this latest outrage and travesty of justice.

One commentator, Robert Gagnon, was quick to get off the mark in highlighting the utter madness of this decision:

Instead of indicting the very organization that was trafficking in human body parts the grand jury indicts the persons who were exposing such trafficking, on the alleged grounds that by posing as persons who wanted to sell fetal body parts they were violating the state’s “prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs.” Say what? So if the feds do an undercover sting operation with the Mafia they can be indicted under RICO racketeering law?

Exactly. It would be as if an international court found that the Nuremberg trials were illegal, letting off the hook the Nazis being tried there. It is that insane and that perverse. Those making massive profits from killing babies and selling their body parts go scot free while those who seek to expose and uncover this dastardly work are the ones being prosecuted!

And surprise, surprise: we now know that a Planned Parenthood board member actually works in the DA’s office which indicted Daleiden. As Jay Sekulow, head of the American Center for Law and Justice states:

What happened in Texas is very troubling. By giving Planned Parenthood a pass and indicting two pro-life journalists who merely revealed this horrific practice through their undercover work, the action of this local grand jury raises serious questions about the appropriate use of our legal system.

When you consider the fact that one of the prosecutors in the Harris County district attorney’s office is deeply involved with Planned Parenthood – serving as a board member for the local Planned Parenthood affiliate in Texas where the undercover investigation took place – along with the fact that she has served as an active fundraiser for Planned Parenthood for years – you have to ask the question – was this probe tainted? Was there a conflict of interest that produced a biased result?

There certainly is a conflict of interest here. Moreover, how many other eyewitnesses will be deterred from testifying about horrific crimes in the future, fearing they too will end up in jail? As Cheryl Sullenger of Operation Rescue said: “This has the effect of chilling the First Amendment freedom of the press and could scare crime witnesses away from coming forward for fear that they might suffer similar retaliatory prosecution.”

And Tennessee Congressman Diane Black put it this way: “It is a sad day in America when those who harvest the body parts of aborted babies escape consequences for their actions, while the courageous truth-tellers who expose their misdeeds are handed down a politically motivated indictment instead. Just days after tens of thousands of pro-life Americans participated in the March for Life to urge legal protection for the unborn, this senseless decision is a grim reminder of the work yet to be done.”

As horrific as all this is, we must look at the bigger picture here. As mentioned, a nation that can kill its own unborn children is already morally dead, and any perversion of justice is possible in such a climate of deadened consciences and ethical blindness.

Matt Walsh highlights these truths in his latest commentary. He begins by offering two very relevant Bible passages here:

-Proverbs 17:15: Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent – the LORD detests them both.

-Isaiah 5:20: Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.

He continues:

The first thing you must understand, if you don’t already, is that we live in a nation devoid of justice and hostile to truth. We live in a nation that acquits the guilty, condemns the innocent, calls evil good and good evil. That is America in 2016, and it’s been this way for quite some time.

Once you come to terms with this fact, you will no longer be surprised by anything that happens, no matter how outrageous, depraved, preposterous, or wicked. You will not be surprised that a billion dollar corporation called Planned Parenthood mutilates and murders over 300,000 children a year for profit, and you will not be surprised that our government gives these genocidal killers over half a billion dollars a year of free money, and you will not be surprised when an undercover investigation reveals Planned Parenthood officials selling the corpses of their victims, and you will not be surprised when the justice system clears the corpse-sellers of all wrong doing but indicts the undercover investigators for investigating them.

He highlights the double standards going on here:

If it’s illegal for investigative journalists to assume false identities, why isn’t Chris Hansen in prison? Hansen and his team pretended to be little girls in order to catch older men attempting to molest children. I suppose if the Harris County DA had a crack at them, all of the pedophiles would be cleared of wrongdoing, but Chris Hansen would be charged with fraud, harassment, and solicitation.

He concludes:

A few months ago, raw footage taped during an abortionist convention was leaked online. Many explosive conversations were captured, but perhaps none as devastating as the abortionist who stated very explicitly that abortion is “violence, it’s a person, it’s killing.”

She wasn’t caught in a crime. Even better: she was caught in a truth. In fact, that one statement, uttered by an abortionist who thought she was speaking only to a sympathetic audience, singlehandedly debunked and destroyed the primary pro-abortion argument. Many of the people who defended Planned Parenthood over the fetal trafficking allegations did so by insisting the babies aren’t people anyway. Well, guess what? The abortionists who kill the children disagree with you.

To me, that should be the headline.

But either way, Daleiden did prove for certain that Planned Parenthood sells baby parts, and that should be enough to take the entire organization down. What Daleiden didn’t account for, however, is that our government is corrupt to its core and many of our citizens are self-absorbed cowards. He didn’t account for the fact that justice is dead in America. In fact, it died long ago. It died the moment they legalized the mass murder of babies.

Yes, a nation that kills its own children is a nation that has killed its own conscience. And it has also killed the very notion of things like justice, decency and fairness. That is why we find this shocking case against Daleiden. In the Brave New World of baby killers and state sponsored murder, the only bad guys are those who dare to speak the truth.

As Orwell once put it, “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”

Please pray for Daleiden and his team. This is indeed a David vs Goliath battle, and it is ultimately a spiritual battle. At the very least, please sign and share this petition: http://www.lifesitenews.com/petitions/i-stand-with-david-daleiden/924785
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-david-daleiden-faces-20-years-in-prison-for-offering-to-purchase-h

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/01/26/planned-parenthood-board-member-works-in-office-of-d-a-who-indicted-david-daleiden/

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/daleiden-indictment-may-scare-other-witnesses-from-speaking-up-pro-life-lea

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/planned-parenthood-will-not-face-justice-because-there-is-no-justice-in-america/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=ShareButtons

http://billmuehlenberg.com/2016/01/27/planned-parenthood-daleiden-and-the-inversion-of-justice/

Naturalistic Evolution And Humanism: The Bloodiest Religion

Blood sacrifice is a part of most religions in some form or another because it seeks to emulate true religion that comes from God. 

It’s actually one of the easy ways to identify a false religion and the kill count of abortion stands as the biggest and longest ongoing blood sacrifice to Satan in history.

Christians are often confronted with the claim that a humanistic worldview will help society become better. Even the first Humanist Manifesto, of which belief in evolution is a subset, declared, “The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently co-operate for the common good.” But can such a statement be true?
For starters, what do the authors mean by “good”? They have no legitimate foundation for such a concept, since one person’s “good” can be another’s “evil.” To have some objective standard, they must borrow from the teachings of God in the Bible.

Beyond that, does evolution really teach a future of prosperity? What has been the result of evolutionary thinking in the past hundred years? Perhaps this could be a test of what is to come. Let’s first look at the casualties stemming from leaders with evolutionary worldviews, beginning in the 1900s, to see the hints of what this “next level” looks like:

Who/What? Specific Event and Estimated Dead

Pre-Hitler Germany/Hitler and the Nazis 

WWI: 20,000,000 dead, 21,000,000 wounded1

WWII: 72,000,0002

Holocaust: 17,000,000? (estimates range from 7 to 26 million)3
Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin Bolshevik revolution and Russian Civil War: 15,000,0004

Joseph Stalin 20,000,0005

Mao Zedong 14,000,000–20,000,0006

Pol Pot (Saloth Sar) 750,000–1,700,0007
Abortion* 

China estimates 1971–2006: 300,000,0008

Russia estimates 1954–1991: 280,000,0009

US estimates 1973–2014: 57,496,01110

France estimates 1936–2006: 5,749,73111

UK estimates 1958–2006: 6,090,73812

Germany estimates 1968–2007: 3,699,62413

Charles Darwin’s view of evolution was catapulted into societies around the world in the mid- to late 1800s. Evolutionary teachings influenced Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong, Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, and many others. Let’s take a closer look at some of these people and events and examine the evolutionary influence and repercussions.

World War I and II, Hitler, Nazis, and the Holocaust

Most historians would point to the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand on June 18, 1914, as the event that triggered World War I (WWI). But tensions were already high considering the state of Europe at the time. Darwinian sentiment was brewing in Germany. Darwin once said:

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian [Aborigine] and the gorilla.14

Darwin viewed the “Caucasian” (white-skinned Europeans) as the dominant “race” in an evolutionary worldview. To many evolutionists at the time, mankind had evolved from ape-like creatures that had more hair, dark skin, dark eyes, etc. Therefore, more “evolved” meant less body hair, blond hair, blue eyes, etc. Later in Hitler’s era, Nazi Germany practiced Lebensborn, which was a controversial program, the details of which have not been entirely brought to light. Many claim it was a breeding program that tried to evolve the “master race” further—more on this below.

But the German sentiment prior to WWI was very much bent on conquering for the purpose of expanding their territory and their “race.” An encyclopedia entry from 1936 states:

In discussions of the background of the war much has been said of Pan-Germanism, which was the spirit of national consciousness carried to the extreme limit. The Pan-Germans, who included not only militarists, but historians, scientists, educators and statesmen, conceived the German people, no matter where they located, as permanently retaining their nationality. The most ambitious of this group believed that it was their mission of Germans to extend their kultur (culture) over the world, and to accomplish this by conquest if necessary. In this connection the theory was advanced that the German was a superior being, destined to dominate other peoples, most of whom were thought of as decadent.15

Germany had been buying into an extreme view of Darwin’s model of evolution and saw themselves as the superior “race,” destined to dominate the world. This view set the stage for Hitler and the Nazi party and paved the road to WWII.

Hitler

World War II dwarfed World War I in the total number of people who died. Racist attitudes exploded in Germany against people groups such as Jews, Poles, and many others. Adolf Hitler was heavily influenced by Darwin’s teaching on evolution.

Hitler even tried to force the Protestant church in Germany to change fundamental tenants because of his newfound faith.16 In 1936, while Hitler was in power, an encyclopedia entry on Hitler stated:

. . . a Hitler attempt to modify the Protestant faith failed.17

His actions strongly suggest that he did not hold to the basic fundamentals taught in the 66 books of the Bible. Though some of his writings suggest he did believe in some form of God early on, his religious views moved toward humanism after his acceptance of evolution. This refutes notions that Hitler was a Protestant Christian as some have claimed. Consider this quote in his unpublished second book:

The types of creatures on the earth are countless, and on an individual level their self-preservation instinct as well as the longing for procreation is always unlimited; however, the space in which this entire life process plays itself out is limited. It is the surface area of a precisely measured sphere on which billions and billions of individual beings struggle for life and succession. In the limitation of this living space lies the compulsion for the struggle for survival, and the struggle for survival, in turn contains the precondition for evolution.18

Hitler continues:

The history of the world in the ages when humans did not yet exist was initially a representation of geological occurrences. The clash of natural forces with each other, the formation of a habitable surface on this planet, the separation of water and land, the formation of the mountains, plains, and the seas. That [was] is the history of the world during this time. Later, with the emergence of organic life, human interest focuses on the appearance and disappearance of its thousandfold forms. Man himself finally becomes visible very late, and from that point on he begins to understand the term “world history” as referring to the history of his own development—in other words, the representation of his own evolution. This development is characterized by the never-ending battle of humans against animals and also against humans themselves.19

Hitler fully believed Darwin as well as Darwin’s precursors—such as Charles Lyell’s geological ages and millions of years of history. In his statements here, there is no reference to God. Instead, he unreservedly flew the banner of naturalism and evolution. His evolutionary views certainly helped lead him and the Nazi party into WWII because they viewed the “Caucasian” as more evolved, which to them justified their adoption of the idea that lesser “races” would be eliminated in the struggle for survival. Among the first to be targeted were Jews, then Poles, and then many others.

Trotsky, Lenin

Trotsky and Lenin were both notorious leaders of the USSR—and specifically the Russian revolution. Lenin, taking power in 1917, became a ruthless leader and selected Trotsky as his heir. Lenin and Trotsky held to Marxism, which was built on Darwinism and evolution. Karl Marx regarded Darwin’s book as an “epoch making book.” With regards to Darwin’s research on natural origins, Marx claimed, “The latter method is the only materialistic and, therefore, the only scientific one.”20

Few realize or admit that Marxism, the primary idea underlying communism, is built on Darwinism. In 1883, Freidrich Engels, Marx’s longtime friend and collaborator, stated at Marx’s funeral service that “Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history.”21 Both Darwin and Marx built their ideologies on naturalism and materialism.

Trotsky once said of Darwin:

Darwin stood for me like a mighty doorkeeper at the entrance to the temple of the universe. I was intoxicated with his minute, precise, conscientious and at the same time powerful, thought. I was the more astonished when I read . . . that he had preserved his belief in God. I absolutely declined to understand how a theory of the origin of species by way of natural selection and sexual selection and a belief in God could find room in one and the same head.22

Trotsky’s high regard for evolution and Darwin were the foundation of his belief system. Like many, Trotsky probably did not realize that most of the precious few instances of the name “God” did not appear in the first edition of Origin of Species. These references were added later, and many suspect that this was done to influence church members to adopt Darwinism. Regardless, Trotsky may not have read much of Darwin’s second book, Descent of Man, in which Darwin claims that man invented God:

The same high mental faculties which first led man to believe in unseen spiritual agencies, then in fetishism, polytheism, and ultimately in monotheism, would infallibly lead him, as long as his reasoning powers remained poorly developed, to various strange superstitions and customs.23

Vladimir Lenin picked up on Darwinism and Marxism and ruled very harshly as an evolutionist. His variants of Marxism have become known as Leninism (see The Development of Capitalism in Russia). Regardless, the evolutionist roots of Marx, Trotsky, and Lenin were the foundation that Communism has stood on—and continues to stand on.

Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, to name a few

Perhaps the most ruthless communist leaders were Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Each of these were social Darwinists, ruling three different countries—the Soviet Union, China, and Cambodia respectively. Their reigns of terror demonstrated the end result of reducing the value of human life to that of mere animals, a Darwinistic teaching.24

Abortion

The war on children has been one of the quietest and yet bloodiest in the past hundred years. In an evolutionary mindset, the unborn have been treated as though they are going through an “animal phase” and can simply be discarded.

Haeckel’s Embryo Drawing

Early evolutionist Ernst Haeckel first popularized the concept that babies in the womb are actually undergoing animal developmental stages, such as a fish stage and so on. This idea has come to be known as ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. Haeckel even faked drawings of various animals’ embryos and had them next to drawn human embryos looking virtually identical.

These drawings have been shown to be completely false.25 Haeckel himself partially confessed as much.26 However, this discredited idea has been used repeatedly for a hundred years! Textbooks today still use this concept, and museums around the world still teach it.

Through this deception, many women have been convinced that the babies they are carrying in their wombs are simply going through an animal phase and can be aborted. Author Ken Ham states:

In fact, some abortion clinics in America have taken women aside to explain to them that what is being aborted is just an embryo in the fish stage of evolution, and that the embryo must not be thought of as human. These women are being fed outright lies.27

Evolutionary views have decreased the value of human life. Throughout the world the casualties of the war on children is staggering. Though deaths of children and the unborn did exist prior to the “evolution revolution,” they have increased exponentially as a result of Darwinian teachings.

Conclusion

Is evolution the cause of wars and deaths? Absolutely not—both existed long before Darwin was born. Sin is the ultimate cause.28 But an evolutionary worldview has done nothing but add fuel to the fire.

In spite of the wars and atrocities caused by those who subscribed to an evolutionary worldview in recent times, there is still hope. We can end the seemingly endless atrocities against the unborn.

In Egypt, Israelite boys were slaughtered by being thrown into the Nile at the command of Pharaoh (Exodus 1:20). And yet, by the providence of God, Moses survived and led the Israelites to safety, and the Lord later judged the Egyptians.

In Israel under the Roman Empire, Herod the Great commanded the slaughter of all the boys under the age of two in and around Bethlehem. And yet, by the providence of God, Jesus, the Son of God, survived and later laid down His life to bring salvation to mankind as the Prince of Peace. Herod’s name, however, went down in history as an evil tyrant and murderer.

In this day and age, governments readily permit the killing of children, both boys and girls, and sometimes command it (abortion). By providence, however, you survived. While we can’t change the past, we can learn from it. If we are to stop this continuing bloodshed, we must get back to the Bible and realize the bankrupt religion of evolution has led only to death—by the millions.
Footnotes

World War I Casualties, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties, October 23, 2008, as with all of these statistics, they may have some variance depending on source.

World War II Casualties, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties, October 23, 2008.

The Holocaust, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust, October 23, 2008.

Russian Civil War, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Civil_War, October 23, 2008.

Joseph Stalin, http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/stalin.html, October 23, 2008.

Mao Tse-Tung, http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/mao.html, October 23, 2008.

Pol Pot, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_Pot, October 23, 2008.

Historical abortion statistics, PR China, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston , last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-prchina.html.

Historical abortion statistics, U.S.S.R., compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston , last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-ussr.html

“Abortion Statistics: United States Data & Trends,” National Right to Life, http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS01AbortionintheUS.pdf.

Historical abortion statistics, France, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston, last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-france.html.

Historical abortion statistics, United Kingdom, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston, last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-unitedkingdom.html

Historical abortion statistics, FR Germany, compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston, last updated 4 June 2008, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-frgermany.html

Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man (New York: A.L. Burt, 1874, 2nd ed.), p. 178.

The American Educator Encyclopedia, The United Educators, Inc., Chicago, 1936, p. 3914 under entry “World War.”

The American Educator Encyclopedia, The United Educators, Inc., Chicago, 1936, p. 1702 under entry “Hitler.”

The American Educator Encyclopedia, The United Educators, Inc., Chicago, 1936, p. 1494 under entry “Germany.”

Hitler’s Second Book, Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gerald L. Weinberg, 2003 Enigma books, Translated by Krista Smith, p. 8.

Hitler’s Second Book, Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gerald L. Weinberg, 2003 Enigma books, Translated by Krista Smith, p. 9.

Great Books of the Western World, Volume 50, Capital, Karl Marx, William Benton (Publishers), Chicago, 1952, Footnotes on p. 166 and p. 181

Gertrude Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, London,: Chatto & Windus, 1959, p. 348.

Eastman, Max, Trotsky: A portrait of his youth, New York, pp. 117-118, 1925.

Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Chapter III (Mental Powers of Man and the Lower Animals), 1871, As printed in the Great Books of the Western World, Volume 49, Robert Hutchins, Ed., Chicago, 1952, p. 303.

Raymond Hall, Darwin’s Impact—The Bloodstained Legacy of Evolution.

Michael Richardson et al, Anatomy and Embryology, 196(2):91-106, 1997.

Haeckel said, “ . . . a small portion of my embryo-pictures (possibly 6 or 8 in a hundred) are really (in Dr Brass’s [one of his critics] sense of the word) “falsified”—all those, namely, in which the disclosed material for inspection is so incomplete or insufficient that one is compelled in a restoration of a connected development series to fill up the gaps through hypotheses, and to reconstruct the missing members through comparative syntheses. What difficulties this task encounters, and how easily the draughts- man may blunder in it, the embryologist alone can judge.” The Truth about Haeckel’s Confession, The Bible Investigator and Inquirer, M.L. Hutchinson, Melbourne, March 11, 1911, p. 22–24.

Ham, Ken, The Lie: Evolution, Chapter 8 (The Evils of Evolution), Master Books, Green Forest, AK, 1987, p. 105.

The New Answers Book 1, Gen. Ed. Ken Ham, Master Books, Green Forest, Arkansas, 2006, Chapter 26: Why Does God’s Creation Include Death and Suffering?, pp.325–338.

https://answersingenesis.org/sanctity-of-life/the-results-of-evolution/

Obama Cries For Dead Children, Just Not The Ones Murdered By His Support For And Funding Of Abortion

When someone claims to care in any way about some social issue, you can always call their bluff based upon their attitude towards murdering children in the womb (euphemistically referred to as “abortion” so that these people can cover their hypocritical butts).

If someone supports the lazy and self-centred convenience of murdering children you don’t want while getting all the sex you do want, then you can know for certain that they actually don’t care about “social justice” but are really in the game of social change for some benefit to themselves.

Sure, they may not be getting briefcases full of cash but dangerous ideologues (like those who support murdering children) can benefit from pushing heir ideologies upon everyone in society. It is, after all, what the Nazis, the Communists, and the entire Islamic World have done to achieve their wonderful freedoms and social utopias.

This appropriately brings us to Obama and his heartfelt desire to prevent the relatively small number of child deaths by guns (but not the millions of children who their brains mashed up and their guts sucked out with a vacuum from their mother’s womb).

This is is the kind of hypocrisy that should make us all vomit our own guts out in the toilet before doing everything we can to stop people legally sucking babies guts out with vacuums.

Alas, many people prefer total sexual licence to kill (concealed by the equally clever euphemism “women’s rights”) to actually caring about all children because they are human beings with value and dignity. Did I mention that they are actually innocent as well, unlike the only killing Leftists actually try to stop: the legitimate and just execution of dangerous criminals.

Anyway, here’s what Obama, champion of children everywhere except the womb, has been up to:

He’s becoming a better actor, this president of ours. On Tuesday, while announcing his new plans to illegally enact more gun control laws without the consent of Congress, President Obama managed to cry on cue.

Obama ran through the requisite list of media-covered shootings in recent years, then got teary-eyed when he got to Newtown, Connecticut. “First graders in Newtown. First graders,” Obama said. “Every time I think about those kids, it gets me mad.”

He put on quite the show, chastising Republican presidential candidates and other conservatives who say his gun grabbing is, well, gun grabbing and that it is unconstitutional.

“No matter how many times people try to twist my words around, I taught constitutional law, I know a little bit about this. I get it,” he said. “But I also believe that we can find ways to reduce gun violence consistent with the Second Amendment.”

The sad thing is, we could do that. But for that to happen, the president would first have to stop sucking up all the air in the room and let Congress talk about things like toughening sentences for using a gun in a crime or like figuring out ways to shut down the illegal avenues criminals often use to obtain guns.

At this point in his Administration, Obama is desperate for some sort of legacy that won’t mark him forever as the weakling Marxist clown who allowed the economy to wallow in misery for two terms and destroyed all progress that had been made by the Bush Administration in the Middle East.

But as usual, none of the gun control laws he is planning to implement by illegal executive order would have done a lick to stop any of the shootings he mentioned in his speech.

Plus, Obama’s being widely slammed for outright lying about criminals being able to buy guns over the Internet without a background check, not to mention some fudged numbers on gun murders.

“Every single year, more than 30,000 Americans have their lives cut short by guns,” Obama said. “Thirty thousand. Suicides, domestic violence, gang shootouts, accidents. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have lost brothers and sisters or buried their own children.”

Even the New York Times admitted that two-thirds of those gun deaths are suicides. FBI stats also show that about 2,500 gun deaths yearly are accidental, so the actual numbers of murders involving a gun is somewhere between 8,000 and 9,000 annually.

But of those guns, the vast majority were obtained illegally.

In one study, about a quarter of inmates convicted of gun crimes admitted to stealing the gun they used. A 2004 study found that of the guns that were not outright stolen before their use in crime, 40 percent were bought on the black market, and an additional 37 percent were obtained through other illegal means.

Several studies have shown that guns that followed all the required transfer rules account for around 8 percent of all murders, and the majority of those deaths are domestic violence, crimes of passion or murders committed by the mentally ill.

So Obama’s rules are guaranteed not to affect the group he claims to be targeting, criminals, or the types of killings he claims to be trying to stop, mass shootings.

His sycophants keep telling us that Obama is a genius, so he must understand that his gun-control plans won’t work against anyone except the law-abiding citizens who won’t commit murder. He knows they won’t help anyone like those Newtown kids he’s supposedly so angry about that he has to spout waterworks on television.

Besides, if he really was so worried about the lives of children, he wouldn’t be such a big supporter of abortion.

No, those tears are the tears of a crocodile.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/27714/obama-sheds-tears-to-sell-gun-control/

Ken Ham’s Response To Barack Obama’s Address

I’ll preface this with the fact that I don’t celebrate Christmas and I think there is much greater wisdom and benefit in remembering and rehearsing the festivals given by God that Jesus himself not only celebrated (along with the apostles and the early church) but fulfilled perfectly to the precise detail and will fulfil future-tense at his coming.

Nonetheless, the church in history made something at least useful out of pagan celebrations and helped to centre Western celebrations around Jesus Christ instead of despicable false gods.

In this way, I am all for an imperfect acknowledgement of Christ’s birth and the recognition that Jesus is God, especially by those who have benefited from the peace and prosperity Christianity established in the Western Hemisphere over the Millenia.

It’s appropriate also that someone like Obama, esteemed by the powerful, should be rebukes by those whom are largely mocked and despised by those same people.

Ken Ham offers the words that our society would do well to heed:

Hi, I’m Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis, the Creation Museum, and the Ark Encounter. Our ministry wants to respond to some of the comments made by the President Sunday night from the White House.
In his address to the American people, the President made statements about the threat of terrorism. Now at the end of his speech, President Obama said,

Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear; that we have always met challenges—whether war or depression, natural disasters or terrorist attacks—by coming together around our common ideals as one nation, as one people. So long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt America will prevail. Thank you. God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

First of all, if what he calls “common ideals” are not built on the authority of the Word of God, then the common ideals are just man’s fallible opinions—which, frankly, will mean that America will not prevail. A fallible human being like the President can claim all he wants that America will prevail, but there’s a God in heaven who is in absolute control of the affairs of the nations!

I think of the verse from Daniel chapter 2 and verse 21: “And He changes the times and the seasons; He removes kings and raises up kings; He gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding.”

Sadly, our President, even though he stated last night that he wants God to bless America, will not acknowledge the Creator God of the Bible—in fact, he has done the opposite: actively supported the removal of the one true God from the public arena. His belief in this regard was seen, for instance, in the recent lighting of the national Christmas tree in Washington, DC, when the President began his speech by saying “happy holidays”—twice.

While he may use the word Christmas on occasion, we all know that when the President says “happy holidays,” like in his speech, it’s largely a deliberate way to keep Christ out of Christmas. He has turned Christmas-related events into secular ones, instead of acknowledging the Babe in a manger—the One who came to be our Savior over 2,000 years ago.

Now, Christians should respect the office of the presidency and pray for our elected officials. But when their actions go contrary to the absolute authority of God’s Word, then we should say something.

Also at the Christmas tree lighting, the first lady, along with the Muppet character Miss Piggy, read a story from the children’s book A Visit from St. Nicholas—a story about Santa Claus.

THE PRESIDENT AND THE FIRST LADY HAVE TOLD AMERICANS THAT THE REAL REASON FOR THE SEASON IS TO HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAY AND ENJOY STORIES ABOUT SANTA.

So the President and the first lady have told Americans that the real reason for the season is to have a happy holiday and enjoy stories about Santa.

At our Christmas Town program at the Creation Museum, we celebrate Christmas in the right way: we reflect on the greatest gift God gave to mankind—the gift of His Son, Jesus—and worship Him. He was the Babe in a manger—the God-man—who came to earth to provide the only way for humans to live forever with their God.

Christmas is a time to celebrate Jesus Christ (as we should do every day of the year) and remember the true account (the historical record) of the birth of a baby. He was the incarnation of the Son of God—the Son of God who took on a fleshly, bodily form.

Second, did God hear President Obama at the end of his speech when he said “God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America”? I suggest God did not. Hear God’s Word from Isaiah chapter 59:

But your iniquities have separated you from your God; and your sins have hidden His face from you, so that He will not hear. For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue has muttered perversity. (verses 2–3)

God’s principles do not change. What he said to the rebellious Israelites, He also says to us today.

Yes, the iniquities of this nation are great. The teaching of the true God, and the reminders of the Christian faith are being removed from this nation—crosses, Nativity scenes, and displays of the Ten Commandments are being taken down from public places. Also, prayer, the Bible, and the teaching of creation have been largely removed from public schools.

Furthermore, the President mocks God’s design for marriage, and endorses a gross sin of gay “marriage” and homosexual behavior. He has endorsed the lie of a false doctrine in regard to marriage.

And the President has helped this nation be “defiled with blood.” He has condoned the murder of millions of children in their mother’s wombs. The same President who said “God bless the United States of America” on Sunday night actually said this in July: “God bless Planned Parenthood.” In other words, he asked God to bless the biggest child-murdering machine in America! Will God ever bless a nation that is so guilty of defiling this land with the shed blood of millions of children?

HOW COULD GOD HEAR THIS PLEA WHEN THE INIQUITIES OF THIS NATION AND THE PRESIDENT ARE SO GREAT?

I humbly suggest that God “will not hear” the President when he asks for God’s blessing on this nation! How could God hear this plea when the iniquities of this nation and the President are so great?

May God have mercy, and may God raise up people to repair the breach in this nation—a breach that has allowed rampant sin and the mocking of God’s Word to permeate the culture.

The prophet Isaiah in chapter 58 declared, “Those from among you shall build the old waste places; you shall raise up the foundations of many generations; and you shall be called the Repairer of the Breach, the Restorer of Streets to Dwell In” (verse 12).

This nation as a whole, and the President in particular, needs to repent before the one true God and return to His Word as the absolute authority in all matters of life and conduct.

The President can talk about the threat of continued terrorism all he wants. But unless this nation deals with gross sin that permeates the culture, I sadly predict that this nation will not see the end of terrible tragedies, like terrorism.

God’s Word in Jeremiah chapter 18 is a reminder to us that He is in total control of the nations, just as a potter controls the clay in his hands. In Jeremiah it says,

Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying: “O house of Israel, can I not do with you as this potter?” says the Lord. “Look, as the clay is in the potter’s hand, so are you in My hand, O house of Israel! The instant I speak concerning a nation and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, to pull down, and to destroy it, if that nation against whom I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I thought to bring upon it. And the instant I speak concerning a nation and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it, if it does evil in My sight so that it does not obey My voice, then I will relent concerning the good with which I said I would benefit it.” (verses 5–10)

May God’s people be emboldened to stand for Him in this nation.

https://answersingenesis.org/culture/america/response-to-president/

There Are No “Christian” Terrorists

The mainstream media plays the double-fold game of looking around cluelessly when the almost-daily now (in the West that is, they average four per day worldwide) Islamic terrorist attack happens and fiercely pointing fingers and accusing the once every few years terrorists who don’t happen to be Muslims of being “Christians” or in the very least, “far-right wing”.

It’s funny. Childish and ironically funny.

Childish doesn’t need explaining but apparently ironic does, so allow me to.

There has never been a terrorist who acted in obedience to Christ.

In fact, the only way a “Christian” (which means “little Christ” and specifcially refers to someone who hears and obeys the words of Jesus) can become a terrorist is if they explicitly stop following Jesus.

Frankly, they would have to stop following Jesus for a little while before they would work their way up to murdering innocent people.

A quick lustful glance at that massive billboard of girl wearing almost nothing? Sure, what Christian man doesn’t have to resist that lustful double-take!

A casual and dismissive “it’s no problem” lie when in fact it is really inconvenient? Ceratinly, we’re fighting both our cultural conditioning and our flesh on that one!

Taking machine guns and pipe bombs to the end of year work party to gun down your co-workers? Not something I’ve personally struggled with…and when we follow Jesus, it’s pretty hard to find yourself even desiring to kill people let alone purchasing the chemicals and bullets to make it happen!

Don’t get me wrong – I follow Jesus and I am tempted to do many of the things I used to have no problem doing as an atheist (yep, lying, fornication, masturbation, stealing, violence, abusing, cursing, drugs, drunkeness – I loved, embraced, and justified it all once!). These days, I usually make better decisions to keep me away from activities that plant the seeds of these desires and, of course, the grace of God is active in my life, conforming to the image of the son of God, Jesus Messiah.

I am not saying Christians can’t be tempted to act according to the desires of the flesh (ie contrary to what Jesus commands) because I am and I have given in far more than I ought to.

But I know that if I start desiring revenge on someone (and I have), I have stopped pursuing Jesus and I need to get myself right with him.

That’s why I know that if someone is at the point of punching bullets through bodies, it means that following Jesus ended a long time ago. It would be fair to say that if a terrorist ever really was a Christian previously, they have long abandoned true faith in God by time they start murdering people.

The bible is full of both warnings against and examples of people wandering away from genuine faith in God. 

Doing what you want to do or feel like doing is actually one of the core tenants of anti-Christian faiths like Naturalism and Wicca, both atheistic religious creeds that exult and serve the self.

Christianity, contrarily, is all about denying the self and serving Christ.

Jesus is very clear about this when he makes this unmistakable statement:

“And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.” Matthew‬ ‭10:38-39‬ ‭ESV‬‬

This command is all about self-denial, about not getting what you want, but rather about choosing to obey God even when it means you don’t get what you want.

And Jesus does not order his followers to murder people, plain and simple.

So, there are no “Christian” terrorists. 

Here’s another good rundown of the logic:

Christian Terrorists Don’t Exist but Islamic Terrorists Do

“I’m sick of these white male NRA Republicans and their mass shootings beca … um, Sayed Farook? Hey, let’s not vilify an entire group.” — Jon Gabriel, editor-in-chief, Ricochet.com

Workplace violence strikes again. “Allahu Akbar!” evidently means, “I quit,” and pipe bombs are the new resignation letter. Southern Baptist redneck Syed Rizwan Farook and his Irish Catholic wife, Tashfeen Malik, are reported to have been inexplicably in touch with ambiguously international, not-at-all-Islam-related terrorists under investigation by the FBI prior to mowing down 35 white-privileged American citizens at a Christmas party in San Bernardino, California.

Investigators feverishly search for a motive.

Multiculturalism was unavailable for comment.

It’s said that not all Muslims are terrorists, but that most terrorists are Muslims. Bleeding heart “religion of peace” Jihad-deniers may explain away the global scourge of Islamic terrorism as “workplace violence,” the “result of climate change” or a “gun control issue” (California has the strictest gun laws in all 50 states, and Paris France has banned guns altogether), but the facts, common sense and our own observations reveal the truth. It’s world-class stupid to insist that, when demon-possessed Muslim terrorists mow down a room full of law-abiding citizens, the “progressive” panacea is to disarm the law-abiding citizens. “Enough is enough,” all right. Sit down, liberals. The adults are talking. We don’t need more gun control, we need more Islam control.

Brigitte Gabriel is a world-renown national security expert. Her concentration is on the – ahem – explosive rise in Islamic terrorism. She notes that there are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world. Of them, intelligence agencies estimate that 15-25 percent are orthodox Muslims, meaning they actually follow the teachings of the Quran.

“That leaves 75 percent of [Muslims being] peaceful people,” observes Gabriel. “But when you look at 15-25 percent of the world’s Muslim population, you’re looking at 180 million to 300 million people dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization. That is as big as the United States,” she concludes.

Indeed, with these harrowing numbers in mind it’s no surprise that there have been nearly 27,500 terrorist attacks worldwide committed by faithful Muslims since 9/11.

There have been zero committed by faithful Christians.

Here’s why.

Muslims, true Muslims, follow the teachings of their dead “prophet” Muhammad, a warring tyrant who, as even the Islamic Quran concedes, was a murderous misogynist and pedophile. Christians, true Christians, follow the very-much-alive Lord Jesus Christ, the God-man, whose teachings are found in the God-breathed Holy Bible.

Read related article: “‘Christian Atheist’ Denounces ‘Christian Terrorists.

Muhammad taught, and the Quran stresses, that a central tenet of Islam is to convert, enslave or kill the infidel. An infidel is anyone who is not Muslim or, depending on who’s doing the killing, belongs to a different sect of Islam. Those who fall into that elusive, perpetually mute category tagged “moderate Muslim” are also infidels or “idolaters.” They’re bad Muslims, and, so, according to the Quran, not Muslims at all. “When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them,” commands Surah 9:5. “Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” Faithful Muslims, true followers of Muhammad, “slay the idolaters wherever [they] find them” (see ISIS, Hamas, Syed Farook, et al.).

It’s what Muslims do.

On the other hand, Jesus taught His followers, who are called Christians, to “do to others what you would have them do to you” (Luke 6:31); that, “You shall not murder” (Matthew 19:18); and that we are to “love [our] enemies and pray for those who persecute [us]” (Matthew 5:44). It goes without saying that those who do not follow these teachings are not following Christ.

Indeed, while many may claim to be “Christian,” the word only applies to those who are justified in Christ, spiritually reborn and regenerated through the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit. The true Christian walks in Christ’s steps through faith and obedience.

Terrorism is in direct disobedience to Christ.

It’s in direct obedience to Muhammad.

Whereas “Muslim extremists,” that is, faithful Muslims, kill people extremely, “Christian extremists,” that is, faithful Christians, love people, including their enemies, extremely.

Islam is Christianity’s photo-negative. While Christianity brings eternal life to those choosing to surrender to Jesus, who alone is “the Way, the Truth and the Life,” Islam brings eternal death to those who surrender to Allah, who is “the best of deceivers” (“[A]nd Allah was deceptive, for Allah is the best of deceivers.” [see Surah 3:54]).

Which brings us to last week’s mass shooting near an abortion slaughterhouse in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Even as the secular left was gleefully screaming, “Christian terrorism!” Garrett Swasey, a pro-life, Christian pastor and police officer, was laying down his life for those inside the very Planned Parenthood he abhorred.

It’s what Christians do.

(For the record, this marks the first time in history that any liberal has been concerned for human life at a Planned Parenthood.)

Still, again, and so our liberal, anti-Christian friends fully understand, Officer Garrett Swasey was a pro-life Christian. Robert Dear, the evil, reclusive, deranged pothead who killed him, is not. Dear murdered three innocent people. He is, by definition, not “pro-life.” Neither is he Christian. He is, much like Planned Parenthood, “pro-death.”

Peas in a pod.

To be sure, pro-life Christians like Officer Swasey agree: Murdering babies is wrong. And murdering the murderers who murder babies is also wrong. Shooting innocent people is evil. Just like dismembering baby girls alive and selling their body parts is evil.

No, Robert Dear is no “Christian terrorist.” He may be a terrorist, but he’s not a Christian terrorist. He can’t be. He doesn’t follow Christ. If anything, Robert Dear’s actions are more like those of Planned Parenthood, orthodox Islam, and Syed Farook.

Bloody bosom buddies.

Yes, there have been terrorists who call themselves Christian.

But there has never been a Christian terrorist.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/26937/christian-terrorists-dont-exist-but-islamic-terrorists-do/
http://godfatherpolitics.com/26850/christian-atheist-denounces-christian-terrorists/

Thought-Crimes: People Who Speak Against Abortion Should Be Banned From Australia So We Can Continue To Murder Children By The Millions In Peace

The new catchphrase of the mainstream media is “radical”.

Rather than having to call the latest Islamic terrorist an “Islamic terrorist”, they can simply doublespeak “radical” instead to avoid the fourteen centuries long connection between Islam and brutal jihad, oppression, and terrorism.

Better yet, the term can be used against any of the political enemies of the left, such as in the recent example of Troy Newman, a prominent anti-murder-by-abortion spokesperson:

Anti-abortion activist Troy Newman has lost his High Court bid to stay in Australia and could be deported as early as this weekend.

Mr Newman flew into Melbourne from the United States on Thursday, despite having his visa revoked by the Immigration Department.

His lawyers tried unsuccessfully to appeal that decision in the High Court in Melbourne on Friday afternoon.

Justice Geoffrey Nettle ruled the department was justified in revoking Mr Newman’s visa over fears the visit would pose a risk to the community.

Justice Nettle ruled Mr Newman may have had a case to challenge the refusal, but said he should not have boarded a plane to Australia knowing his visa had been cancelled.

“Acting as he did means he does not come to this court with clean hands,” he said.

Mr Newman had no right to treat the law as “nought”, Justice Nettle ruled.

Mr Newman is the head of anti-abortion organisation Operation Rescue and was due to speak in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Hobart and Cairns over the next fortnight at events run by the group Right To Life Australia.

He is the co-author of the book Their Blood Cries Out, which was published in 2000.

In the book he questions why doctors who perform abortions are not executed and asks why women or men who request the procedure are not charged with murder.

Government seeks to expedite Mr Newman’s deportation

In a statement, Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said he had instructed the department to “expedite” Mr Newman’s removal from Australia.

“Any person who enters Australia without a valid visa and does not have a lawful basis to remain in Australia is expected to depart,” he said.

“His detention and removal is entirely related to his decision to openly flout Australian law and travel to Australia without a valid visa.”

Mr Dutton said he had also asked the department to look at how Mr Newman was able to board a flight to Australia despite him being flagged on the Movement Alert List system.

“Any airline involved faces a fine for carriage of a person who does not hold a valid visa,” he said in the statement.

In a mid-flight Facebook post on his way to Australia earlier this week, Mr Newman urged his followers to pray for him to get through immigration.

“The revocation was based on a pile of lies, including the idea that I promote violence,” the post said.

“My 25-year history of peaceful, prayerful action speaks for itself.

“Through a chain of events the Lord has allowed me to get on a plane in spite of many objections by the airlines and Australia.”

Mr Newman has a month to challenge the visa refusal from the United States. If successful he can return to Australia.

Labor MP Terri Butler said she respectfully agreed with the court’s decision.

“The guy got on a plane knowing he didn’t have a visa and tried to get in past immigration and customs … you can’t get any more contemptuous of Australian law than that, you can’t get more arrogant than that,” she said.

Ms Butler said if Mr Newman decided to challenge the decision he should do so in a more “respectful” way.

“If you think you can just ignore our law and treat our courts as though they don’t matter and treat our Government as if it doesn’t matter, well people aren’t going to cop that,” she said.

Its funny how people will go out of their way to make excuses for asylum seekers who come to Australia without visas bu when someone comes to warn againstmurdering your own children, suddenly it’s disrespectful and insulting behaviour.

Bill Muehlenberg’s response is worth reading:

Um, say that again? Seeking to defend the lives of innocent babies is a risk? But slaughtering them wholesale and openly advocating the same is not? A person dedicated to protecting babies is the evil terrorist here, while those who are intent on killing them en masse for profit are the good guys?

There are many who are responsible for this sheer madness. Pro-abortion Labor MP Terri Butler is obviously guilty here. She is one of those who instigated this anti-Newman campaign, along with her baby-hating buddies. The mainstream media is fully culpable here as well, repeating one lie after another.

Indeed, I just heard one tool on the Ch. 9 news say Newman had told people to murder abortion doctors!! The sheer impunity with which these media stooges simply lie and lie again is utterly mind-boggling. Just make stuff up as you go along, with absolutely no accountability or fear of reprisal for spreading lies.

Of course one can speak about the guilty church – the silent church. How many churches were even aware of this particular episode, let alone the general war on the unborn? How many churches have never spoken out on the slaughter of the innocents? How many pastors have kept completely silent on this

When we are more worried about building up big crowds and keeping the collection plates full of moolah, then we fully share in the blame here. Indeed, the craven and cowardly churches which never speak out on this are just as guilty as the abortionists who actually kill the babies.

Welcome to the thought-controlled future where you will support abortion because the government will make any dissenting opinions (ie thought-crimes) are silenced in whatever ways are necessary for the safety of the population (except the gutted and beheaded babies in the womb).
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-02/anti-abortionist-troy-newman-lose-court-bid-to-stay-in-australia/6823952
http://billmuehlenberg.com/2015/10/02/australias-appalling-treatment-of-political-prisoner-newman/

The Long, Leftist History Of Malcolm Turnbull

Want to know what our latest Prime Minister stands for?

The one place that can tell you accurately is not the polls, nor the mainstream media, nor your friend’s and family’s opinions of the polls and the mainstream media reports, but rather simple and straightforward history.

It’s the one place most voters don’t care for – in fact, history is something that most people in general have no time for nor interest in.

Nonetheless, here is a nice, long record of Malcolm Turnbull’s political choices and actions:

http://stopturnbull.com
This one sums Turnbull up quite nicely I think:

27th November, 2009 – Turnbull’s frontbench collapses, with mass resignations, but he maintains support among the more left-leaning elements of the party.

Turnbull goes on ABC radio to launch a vicious public attack on the conservatives who have resigned. Meanwhile, the Labor party praise Turnbull for his co-operation on their Emissions Trading Scheme, with Julia Gillard saying:

“I would like to pay a tribute to Mr Turnbull. Mr Turnbull has been acting constructively, in the nation’s interests, on this matter.”

Why vote for the Turnbull-led Liberal party when you can vote for Labor?

They are essentially the same thing in terms of morality and in politics, this is really the only thing that matters.

Nonetheless, we should pray for Turnbull as the leader of our nation and ask that God might make a righteous leader out of him.

“First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” ‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭2:1-4‬ ‭ESV‬‬
http://stopturnbull.com

What’s More Important: The Legality Or The Morality Of Abortion?

Many people insist on framing the discussion about abortion around its legality as though that determines morality in the situation.

It’s this kind of relativity that could justify the Holocaust and any other unthinkable crime, purely because some people made a law that permitted it.

Dennis Prager calls this kind of thinking into question in the important video below:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AMwkQVpy98A